Um estudo dos operadores argumentativos no gênero petição inicial

• Autor(a) principal: Cerchiaro, Luciana
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/29183
• topic: CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS::LINGUA PORTUGUESA; Linguística textual; Argumentação; Operadores argumentativos; Text linguistics; Argumentation; Argumentative operators

The present study aims to survey and analyze the argumentative operators adopted in three plaintiff's complaints and also intends to understand how they were used by the legal professionals whose goal – when writing those texts – were to convince the interlocutor (the judge) for a favorable decision (judgment) to them. Based on the work of Voese (2011) and Rodrìguez (2011), it was possible to define the concept of argumentation in the field of Law where to draft a text that follows the model of writings for legal purposes it is necessary to consider the formal logic, which, in turn, is different from the logic applied in the exact and natural sciences. To review the argumentative operators adopted in the selected plaintiff's complaints it was used as a basis the work of Koch (1992, 2011) and Ducrot (1987), in which each group of operators has a unique function, and their use – when connecting the statements – creates a structured cohesive text, achieving their goal that is to give reasons to support a cause/thesis