A interpretação constitucional e suas especificidades

• Autor(a) principal: Zamlutti Júnior, René
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6992
• topic: Direito; Constituição; Neoconstitucionalismo; Transconstitucionalismo; Interpretação; Hermenêutica constitucional; Law; Constitution; Neoconstitutionalism; Trans-constitutionalism; Interpretation; Constitutional hermeneutics; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

This study aims to demonstrate the existence of a truly constitutional interpretation, which, though founded on traditional hermeneutical techniques, departs from the so-called general legal interpretation, because of the peculiarities that distinguish the constitutional rules of the infra-constitutional norms. Although the majority within the terms of the existence of a typical constitutional interpretation, autonomous from the general legal interpretation, there is considerable portion of doctrine which does not recognize this autonomy. It will seek to demonstrate, first, what are the fundamental differences, formal and material that exist between constitutional and infra-constitutional norms, especially in the current historical period, in which the advent of Social States and called neoconstitutionalism reconfigured the profiles of the constitutions and the State's role, shifting the constitutional text to the center of the legal universe and raising human and fundamental rights to the north interpretive condition of other rules of existing systems. The current role of constitutions and constitutional courts will be analyzed in light of the internationalization of constitutional law and called trans-constitutionalism. Finally, established the existence of a truly constitutional interpretation, will seek to demonstrate how this interpretive process occurs in the plurality of legal systems environment, national and supranational, which both relate to the same legal problem, creating possible antinomies that must be resolved not by traditional hierarchical criteria, non-existent in this context, but by the dialogue between those legal systems