Produção de provas em sede recursal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21760 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this dissertation was to answer the question whether there is only one single moment and no other moment to produce the evidence in the process. In order to answer the question, we investigated the possibility of producing evidence in appeals. The research was developed under a theoretical-doctrinal bias, analyzing four distinct aspects of the procedural phenomenon: the parties, the judge, the appeals and the evidence. It was analyzed when the parties can produce evidence in a court seat, the legal action of the trial for the production of evidence, which features involve the production of evidence and which evidence be produced after the typical investigation phase. This dissertation traces the beacons so that evidence can be produced after the time provided for procedural instruction. It was concluded that it is possible to produce evidence in a court seat, but this is not a rule, but an exception to the system and clarifies and complements the factual-evidential framework of the case or allows the decision to reflect the current state of the litigious object, with the insertion of facts and evidence supervenientes in the process |
id |
PUC_SP-1_2a4a07d249fa5726877751aa7b40570d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/21760 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lopes, João Batistahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4746041D2Zampar Júnior, José Américo2018-12-14T11:44:57Z2021-05-132018-11-27Zampar Júnior, José Américo. Produção de provas em sede recursal. 2018. 235 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21760The purpose of this dissertation was to answer the question whether there is only one single moment and no other moment to produce the evidence in the process. In order to answer the question, we investigated the possibility of producing evidence in appeals. The research was developed under a theoretical-doctrinal bias, analyzing four distinct aspects of the procedural phenomenon: the parties, the judge, the appeals and the evidence. It was analyzed when the parties can produce evidence in a court seat, the legal action of the trial for the production of evidence, which features involve the production of evidence and which evidence be produced after the typical investigation phase. This dissertation traces the beacons so that evidence can be produced after the time provided for procedural instruction. It was concluded that it is possible to produce evidence in a court seat, but this is not a rule, but an exception to the system and clarifies and complements the factual-evidential framework of the case or allows the decision to reflect the current state of the litigious object, with the insertion of facts and evidence supervenientes in the processA presente dissertação teve como objetivo responder à questão se existe apenas um momento único e excludente de qualquer outro para a produção da prova no processo. Para responder à questão investigou-se a possibilidade de serem produzidas provas em sede de recursos. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida sob um viés teórico-doutrinário, analisando quatro aspectos distintos do fenômeno processual: as partes, o juiz, os recursos e as provas. Analisou-se quando as partes podem produzir provas em sede recursal, a atuação de ofício do juízo para a produção das provas, quais recursos comportam a produção de provas e quais provas comportam serem produzidas posteriormente à fase instrutória típica. O trabalho traça as balizas para que a prova possa ser produzida após o momento previsto para a instrução processual. Concluiu-se ser possível a produção de prova em sede recursal, todavia esta não é regra, mas exceção do sistema e se volta a aclarar e complementar o quadro fático-probatório do processo ou possibilitar que a decisão reflita o estado atual do objeto litigioso, com a inserção de fatos e provas supervenientes no processoapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/47733/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoDireito Processual CivilProva (Direito)Recursos (Direito)Civil Procedural LawEvidence (Law)Remedies (Law)CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOProdução de provas em sede recursalProduction of evidence in appealsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJosé Américo Zampar Júnior.pdf.txtJosé Américo Zampar Júnior.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain695774https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/5/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf.txt48548632a12d781ff9ddf62a79b692deMD55ORIGINALJosé Américo Zampar Júnior.pdfJosé Américo Zampar Júnior.pdfapplication/pdf1696664https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/2/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf18a0c629a2f92a3a673492e43792847dMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/3/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD53THUMBNAILJosé Américo Zampar Júnior.pdf.jpgJosé Américo Zampar Júnior.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/4/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD54handle/217602022-08-22 18:11:34.827oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/21760Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:34Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Production of evidence in appeals |
title |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
spellingShingle |
Produção de provas em sede recursal Zampar Júnior, José Américo Direito Processual Civil Prova (Direito) Recursos (Direito) Civil Procedural Law Evidence (Law) Remedies (Law) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
title_full |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
title_fullStr |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
title_sort |
Produção de provas em sede recursal |
author |
Zampar Júnior, José Américo |
author_facet |
Zampar Júnior, José Américo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, João Batista |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4746041D2 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zampar Júnior, José Américo |
contributor_str_mv |
Lopes, João Batista |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Processual Civil Prova (Direito) Recursos (Direito) |
topic |
Direito Processual Civil Prova (Direito) Recursos (Direito) Civil Procedural Law Evidence (Law) Remedies (Law) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Civil Procedural Law Evidence (Law) Remedies (Law) |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The purpose of this dissertation was to answer the question whether there is only one single moment and no other moment to produce the evidence in the process. In order to answer the question, we investigated the possibility of producing evidence in appeals. The research was developed under a theoretical-doctrinal bias, analyzing four distinct aspects of the procedural phenomenon: the parties, the judge, the appeals and the evidence. It was analyzed when the parties can produce evidence in a court seat, the legal action of the trial for the production of evidence, which features involve the production of evidence and which evidence be produced after the typical investigation phase. This dissertation traces the beacons so that evidence can be produced after the time provided for procedural instruction. It was concluded that it is possible to produce evidence in a court seat, but this is not a rule, but an exception to the system and clarifies and complements the factual-evidential framework of the case or allows the decision to reflect the current state of the litigious object, with the insertion of facts and evidence supervenientes in the process |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-14T11:44:57Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-27 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Zampar Júnior, José Américo. Produção de provas em sede recursal. 2018. 235 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21760 |
identifier_str_mv |
Zampar Júnior, José Américo. Produção de provas em sede recursal. 2018. 235 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21760 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/5/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/2/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/3/license.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21760/4/Jos%c3%a9%20Am%c3%a9rico%20Zampar%20J%c3%banior.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
48548632a12d781ff9ddf62a79b692de 18a0c629a2f92a3a673492e43792847d bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277848897191936 |