A excepcionalidade da prova ilícita no processo civil para defesa de direito fundamental

• Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Ana Clara de Sousa Mendes
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/31901
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO; Direito à prova; Direito fundamental; Direito processual civil; Right to evidence; Fundamental right; Civil procedural law

The Right to Evidence in Civil Procedural Law is translated into the essence of the fundamental rights to a full defense and to adversary proceedings, because, regarding the potential for convincing the Judge, evidence not only supports the narrative, but it is often the very description of the facts, and therefore the cause of action. After all, it is from the examination of the facts and their compliance with objective law that the judge will extract the solution to the dispute, to be revealed by means of the sentence. Considering that the right to proof is a fundamental right, the main objective of this work is to approach the view that, in exceptional cases, illicit proof is admitted, when the background of the dispute is the defense of a fundamental right. It is proposed, thus, to criticize the absence of minimally objective criteria to guide the acceptance of illicit evidence, to demonstrate the non-technical and unmeasured application of the Brazilian Courts, basing themselves, lightly, on Robert Alexy's theory of the proportionality. Therefore, it is discussed about which requirements would be essential to relativize the constitutional rule regarding prohibition of illicit evidence in front of annihilation’s risk of other fundamental rights