A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24583 |
Resumo: | The goal of this work is presenting Bertrand Russell’ thought from the unfinished 1913 manuscript, and debate the consequences of the criticism that Wittgenstein directed to some central points of that thought. Considering that goal, the discussions of this thesis will try to answer the following questions: is there any currentness in Theory of knowledge? To what point is Russell's thought able to resist to the criticism from Wittgenstein? What themes did Russell's thought abandon? What themes from Russell's thought (of 1913) remain important to our reflection? Trying to adress those questions, the present work will use two argumentative lines. The first of those lines takes the following assumption: the mature thought from Russell ‒ which beginning is the paper On propositions: what they are and how they mean ‒ keeps its currentness. From that assumption, the first argumentative strategy will be: without disregarding the relevance of Russell's work (from 1913) to a series of thinkers, this work will try to show the thematic continuity between Theory of knowledge to the mature thought from Russell, and to highlight the fact that, that book is part of a broader project that runs through a big part of Russell's production. Besides of that argument, this work will try to show some difference between Russell's and Wittgenstein's philosophical projects, because, if it is possible to verify that kind of difference, it's, at least, plausible to claim that Russell's project couldn't be totally assessed with ground at Wittgenstein's project |
id |
PUC_SP-1_2bf900f13cf4296a5e306dfd0cb39f88 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/24583 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ibri, Ivo Assadhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9043383494087305http://lattes.cnpq.br/3784123394319681Saran, Lucas Antonio2022-02-22T12:55:46Z2022-02-22T12:55:46Z2021-08-17Saran, Lucas Antonio. A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell. 2021. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021.https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24583The goal of this work is presenting Bertrand Russell’ thought from the unfinished 1913 manuscript, and debate the consequences of the criticism that Wittgenstein directed to some central points of that thought. Considering that goal, the discussions of this thesis will try to answer the following questions: is there any currentness in Theory of knowledge? To what point is Russell's thought able to resist to the criticism from Wittgenstein? What themes did Russell's thought abandon? What themes from Russell's thought (of 1913) remain important to our reflection? Trying to adress those questions, the present work will use two argumentative lines. The first of those lines takes the following assumption: the mature thought from Russell ‒ which beginning is the paper On propositions: what they are and how they mean ‒ keeps its currentness. From that assumption, the first argumentative strategy will be: without disregarding the relevance of Russell's work (from 1913) to a series of thinkers, this work will try to show the thematic continuity between Theory of knowledge to the mature thought from Russell, and to highlight the fact that, that book is part of a broader project that runs through a big part of Russell's production. Besides of that argument, this work will try to show some difference between Russell's and Wittgenstein's philosophical projects, because, if it is possible to verify that kind of difference, it's, at least, plausible to claim that Russell's project couldn't be totally assessed with ground at Wittgenstein's projectO objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar o pensamento de Bertrand Russell do manuscrito inacabado de 1913, e debater as consequências das críticas que Wittgenstein dirigiu a alguns pontos centrais desse pensamento. Diante desse objetivo, as discussões desta tese tentarão responder às seguintes questões: existe alguma atualidade em Theory of knowledge? até que ponto o pensamento de Russell consegue resistir às críticas de Wittgenstein? Que temas o pensamento de Russell abandonou? Que temas do pensamento de Russell (de 1913) permanecem importantes para nossa reflexão? Tentando abordar essas questões, o presente trabalho utilizará duas linhas argumentativas. A primeira dessas linhas assume o seguinte pressuposto: o pensamento maduro de Russell ‒ cujo início é o artigo On propositions: what they are and how they mean ‒ mantém sua atualidade. Partindo desse pressuposto, a primeira estratégia argumentativa será: sem desconsiderar a relevância da obra de Russell (de 1913) para uma série de pensadores, este trabalho tentará mostrar a continuidade temática entre Theory of knowledge e o pensamento maduro de Russell, e destacar o fato de que esse livro faz parte de um projeto mais amplo que percorre grande parte da produção do filosofo inglês. Além desse argumento, este trabalho tentará mostrar alguma diferença entre os projetos filosóficos de Russell e Wittgenstein, pois, se for possível verificar esse tipo de diferença, é, pelo menos, plausível afirmar que o projeto de Russell não poderia ser totalmente avaliado com base no projeto de WittgensteinporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em FilosofiaPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e ArtesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIARussell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Crítica e interpretaçãoWittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Crítica e interpretaçãoTeoria do conhecimentoRussell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Criticism and interpretationWittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Criticism and interpretationKnowledge, Theory ofA crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russellinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPORIGINALLucas Antonio Saran.pdfapplication/pdf1695397https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/24583/1/Lucas%20Antonio%20Saran.pdf453ba201a765ece261282bec2146e536MD51TEXTLucas Antonio Saran.pdf.txtLucas Antonio Saran.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain740904https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/24583/2/Lucas%20Antonio%20Saran.pdf.txtff1ef5cd1752c4560dcadf097ad050bfMD52THUMBNAILLucas Antonio Saran.pdf.jpgLucas Antonio Saran.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1136https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/24583/3/Lucas%20Antonio%20Saran.pdf.jpgd16d75e21780f88bc086540f574ba1cdMD53handle/245832023-06-19 08:56:05.343oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/24583Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2023-06-19T11:56:05Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
title |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
spellingShingle |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell Saran, Lucas Antonio CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA Russell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Crítica e interpretação Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Crítica e interpretação Teoria do conhecimento Russell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Criticism and interpretation Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Criticism and interpretation Knowledge, Theory of |
title_short |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
title_full |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
title_fullStr |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
title_full_unstemmed |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
title_sort |
A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell |
author |
Saran, Lucas Antonio |
author_facet |
Saran, Lucas Antonio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9043383494087305 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3784123394319681 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saran, Lucas Antonio |
contributor_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA Russell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Crítica e interpretação Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Crítica e interpretação Teoria do conhecimento Russell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Criticism and interpretation Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Criticism and interpretation Knowledge, Theory of |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Russell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Crítica e interpretação Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Crítica e interpretação Teoria do conhecimento |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Russell, Bertrand [1872-1970] - Criticism and interpretation Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1889-1951] - Criticism and interpretation Knowledge, Theory of |
description |
The goal of this work is presenting Bertrand Russell’ thought from the unfinished 1913 manuscript, and debate the consequences of the criticism that Wittgenstein directed to some central points of that thought. Considering that goal, the discussions of this thesis will try to answer the following questions: is there any currentness in Theory of knowledge? To what point is Russell's thought able to resist to the criticism from Wittgenstein? What themes did Russell's thought abandon? What themes from Russell's thought (of 1913) remain important to our reflection? Trying to adress those questions, the present work will use two argumentative lines. The first of those lines takes the following assumption: the mature thought from Russell ‒ which beginning is the paper On propositions: what they are and how they mean ‒ keeps its currentness. From that assumption, the first argumentative strategy will be: without disregarding the relevance of Russell's work (from 1913) to a series of thinkers, this work will try to show the thematic continuity between Theory of knowledge to the mature thought from Russell, and to highlight the fact that, that book is part of a broader project that runs through a big part of Russell's production. Besides of that argument, this work will try to show some difference between Russell's and Wittgenstein's philosophical projects, because, if it is possible to verify that kind of difference, it's, at least, plausible to claim that Russell's project couldn't be totally assessed with ground at Wittgenstein's project |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-17 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-22T12:55:46Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-22T12:55:46Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Saran, Lucas Antonio. A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell. 2021. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24583 |
identifier_str_mv |
Saran, Lucas Antonio. A crítica de Wittgenstein a Russell: uma possível defesa de Russell. 2021. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021. |
url |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24583 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/24583/1/Lucas%20Antonio%20Saran.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/24583/2/Lucas%20Antonio%20Saran.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/24583/3/Lucas%20Antonio%20Saran.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
453ba201a765ece261282bec2146e536 ff1ef5cd1752c4560dcadf097ad050bf d16d75e21780f88bc086540f574ba1cd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277929705701376 |