Validação dos indicadores de risco para a constituição do leitor/escrevente

• Autor(a) principal: Venezian, Janaina de Albuquerque
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/12018
• topic: Estudos de Validação; indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde; Fonoaudiologia; Leitura e escrita; Educação; Validation studies; Quality indicators in health care; Speech Therapy; Reading and writing; Education; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA

Due to the high functional illiteracy rate in the population among people with low schooling or those who attend school for years and do not perform the reading and writing competently, we wonder how the speech terapist could act to modify this panorama. OBJECTIVE: Validate risk indicators for the constitution of the reader/writer. METHOD: It is a quantitative-­‐ qualitative research, in which a retrospective auto fill questionnaire, based on risk indicators for reading/writing, was applied to a population of 293 parents of children from a public school in São Paulo. The poll, official evaluation in the public schools of São Paulo, and the evaluation of text production were used as additional data about the current performance of the children in reading and writing. Data were analyzed according to the adopted theory and statistically. We calculated the internal and external validity of the instrument: reliability, convergent validity and construct validity. RESULTS: it was possible to verify that the reliability of questionnaire was of αCronbach=0,73, considered acceptable, as reference. In convergent validity analysis, it was found that the questionnaire showed a statistically significant positive correlation to the poll (r=0,27; p<0,001), correlation classified as regular. But the questionnaire and performance on text production had statistically positive correlation only for those filled by parents who had complaints about their children s reading and writing (r=0,55; p=0,029). It was possible to attest the validity of the construct in a set of 8 of the 15 indicators initially proposed. CONCLUSION: The research allowed the validation of risk indicators for the constitution of the reader/writer. We suggest it to be extended to a larger number of subjects, of different ages and socio economic levels and, at the same time that intervention measures be developed for cases where the results of the application of the indicators point to the possibility of problems in reading and writing