O sujeito e o Outro no conflito de Hamlet

• Autor(a) principal: Ferretti, Mariana Galletti
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16908
• topic: Psicanálise; Hamlet; Lacan; Sujeito; Outro, Laço social; Psychoanalysis; Subject; Other; Social bond; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL

This work intends, starting from Shakespeare s intuition about the human condition expressed in the vicissitudes of Hamlet s character, to deepen a reflection on the concept of subject in Lacan s theory articulated to the formularization of the author concerning the structure and the logic times of the subject s constitution. Is extremely important to emphasize that Hamlet won t be understood as a representation of one subject in constitution. The approach to this character must be comprehended merely as propitious context to ponder on fundamental aspects of the subject s structure. This research is organized in four main stages: the first aims to introduce the reader to the question of the existing connection between psychoanalysis, art and literature; the second concerns the singularity intrinsic to the work on this famous Shakespearian production Hamlet; in the third stage, the Lacanian concepts of subject and the Other were developed; in the fourth, the connection between the concepts of Oedipus complex and the paternal metaphor was discussed trying to make clear and bring to context the articulations of both within the Shakespearian play. These concepts, that represent capital points of the Freudian and Lacanian theories, respectively, have common aspects, but aren t synonymous. Since the Lacanian theory, in which this research is based on, has many unfoldings, it was necessary to establish a delimitation of the study, that aimed to embrace the Lacanian theorizations endeavoured up to the The Seminar 10. It was possible to regard Hamlet as a portrait of the contingencies of neurosis. That being a psychic structure resulting from a determinate function of the Other, we may say that the conflict in Hamlet has clear connection with the social bonds that are established between him and the Other. Still, the question of the structure is, for Lacan, anterior and subjacent, always in the logic sense, to the establishment of the social bonds. The structural lack generates determinate effects that influence the relation between the subject and the Other. Hamlet suffers from the contingencies of his structure in the bond with the Other