Da coisa julgada e seus limites objetivos no sistema processual civil atual

• Autor(a) principal: Bradfield, Nicholas Reimer
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/35221
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Coisa julgada; Liebman; Inovação; Autoridade; Limites objetivos; Questão prejudicial; Res iudicata; Liebman; Inovation; Autority; Objective limits; Question referred for a preliminar ruling

The present article has the objetctive to analyze the evolution of the concept of res judicata, dealing with the existing innovations in the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, specifically in relation to its objective limits. The new code of civil proceduter significantly altered the concept of res judicata in the Brasilian civil procedure, which approached to Liebman's ideas, that had been rejected by the legislature that approved the old brazilian code of civil procedure, that entered into force in 1973. Now, the Article 502 defines the res judicata as the authority that makes the decision of merit immutable, no longer making only reference to the immutability of the sentence itself, admiting that all decisions of merit can become imumutable and indisputable. In addition, it further innovates, determining that the merit decisions will have the force of law within the limits of the main issue expressly decided, which shows that the objective limits of the res judicata extend to the very object in dispute, that is, the cause of the request and the request itself. On the other hand, Article 503, paragraph 1, of the new code of civil procedure establishes that the question referred for a preliminar ruling will be reached by the authority of the res judicata, when it is expressly decided, and if the legal determinations are accomplished. It is remarcable, therefore, that the new civil procedure code eliminated the need to file an incidental declaratory action, so that the expressly decided question referred for a preliminar ruling can become immutable and indisputable.