A culpa na separação e no divórcio
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8065 |
Resumo: | According to current legislation, partnerships and conjugal relations may be amicable or litigious dissolved. Since 04 Jan 2007 and after some requirements filled out, a couple that intends a divorce or an amicable separation has the extrajudicial formality as another option for reaching their aim. During the search for the roots of divorce and separation guilt, an introspection in canon and roman laws was realized. Modern law was reached as Middle Age ended. The family law received a severe influence from the protestant reform and as consequence, the secularization of law and a definitive separation of State and Church took place. In the research of guilt evolution in matrimony dissolution and under the paternal system, the first regulations were initiated, when the matrimony was still considered an indissolvable institution, and after, the divorce maked the relation rupture possible Before the promulgation of the Federal Constitution in 1988 an analysis of guilt was realized, facing the fundamental principle of human dignity and its reflex in matrimony dissolutions as well as the strengthening of the idea of conjugal life rupture and the weakness of guilt idea for judicial separations motivation. In this context, a doctrinal debate takes place considering the convenience of the guilt maintenance in the national juridical system. This questioning grows in importance as the consequences of guilt elimination in family law are analyzed, and the possibility to litigate the reparation of damages eventually suffered from the violation of matrimony duties, and understood as a necessary illicit act in the configuration of civil responsibility for moral and material damages. We may conclude by saying that the guilt strong presence in the separation acts motivation is unfeasible, at least in this present moment, for its total elimination from the national juridical scenario |
id |
PUC_SP-1_5881ad8c7f4f0eb2158c4300926770d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/8065 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Diniz, Maria HelenaVera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues2016-04-26T20:27:11Z2008-06-122008-05-13Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues. The guilt in the legal separation and the divorce. 2008. 236 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8065According to current legislation, partnerships and conjugal relations may be amicable or litigious dissolved. Since 04 Jan 2007 and after some requirements filled out, a couple that intends a divorce or an amicable separation has the extrajudicial formality as another option for reaching their aim. During the search for the roots of divorce and separation guilt, an introspection in canon and roman laws was realized. Modern law was reached as Middle Age ended. The family law received a severe influence from the protestant reform and as consequence, the secularization of law and a definitive separation of State and Church took place. In the research of guilt evolution in matrimony dissolution and under the paternal system, the first regulations were initiated, when the matrimony was still considered an indissolvable institution, and after, the divorce maked the relation rupture possible Before the promulgation of the Federal Constitution in 1988 an analysis of guilt was realized, facing the fundamental principle of human dignity and its reflex in matrimony dissolutions as well as the strengthening of the idea of conjugal life rupture and the weakness of guilt idea for judicial separations motivation. In this context, a doctrinal debate takes place considering the convenience of the guilt maintenance in the national juridical system. This questioning grows in importance as the consequences of guilt elimination in family law are analyzed, and the possibility to litigate the reparation of damages eventually suffered from the violation of matrimony duties, and understood as a necessary illicit act in the configuration of civil responsibility for moral and material damages. We may conclude by saying that the guilt strong presence in the separation acts motivation is unfeasible, at least in this present moment, for its total elimination from the national juridical scenarioPela atual legislação, a sociedade e o vínculo conjugal podem ser dissolvidos de modo consensual ou litigioso. Desde 04.01.2007, o casal que pretende se separar ou se divorciar consensualmente dispõe de mais uma forma para atingir seu intento, a modalidade extrajudicial, desde que preenchidos certos requisitos. Na busca das raízes da culpa na separação e no divórcio, realiza uma introspecção no direito romano e no direito canônico, chegando ao direito moderno, que marcou o fim da Idade Média e sofreu, no âmbito do direito de família, severa influência da reforma protestante, que culminou com a secularização do direito, separando em definitivo o Estado da Igreja. A pesquisa sobre a evolução da culpa na dissolução do matrimônio no ordenamento pátrio inicia-se na vigência das primeiras regulamentações, quando o casamento era considerado uma instituição de caráter indissolúvel, passando à possibilidade de ruptura do vínculo do casamento através do divórcio. Ante a promulgação da Constituição Federal em 1988, analisa a culpa frente ao princípio fundamental da dignidade da pessoa humana e seus reflexos nas dissoluções matrimoniais, bem como o fortalecimento do conceito de ruptura da vida em comum, frente ao enfraquecimento da idéia de culpa, a motivar as separações judiciais. Nesse contexto, apresenta o debate doutrinário sobre a conveniência de se manter a culpa no ordenamento jurídico nacional, questionamento que cresce em importância, na medida que se analisam as conseqüências decorrentes da eliminação da culpa do direito de família e a possibilidade de se pleitear a reparação de danos eventualmente sofridos pela violação dos deveres do casamento, entendida essa como ato ilícito necessário à configuração da responsabilidade civil, tanto por danos morais, como materiais. Conclui ao final que a forte presença da culpa a motivar as ações de separação torna inviável, ao menos no momento atual, a sua total eliminação do panorama jurídico nacionalapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/16867/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBRFaculdade de DireitoDireito de famíliaCulpaSeparaçãoDivórcioCulpa (Direito) -- BrasilSeparacao (Direito) -- BrasilDivorcio -- Leis e legislacao -- BrasilFamily lawGuiltSeparationDivorceCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA culpa na separação e no divórcioThe guilt in the legal separation and the divorceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTMercedes Cristina Rodrigues Vera.pdf.txtMercedes Cristina Rodrigues Vera.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain483298https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/8065/3/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf.txt42abf527468bff6e9302187d366d0b28MD53ORIGINALMercedes Cristina Rodrigues Vera.pdfapplication/pdf941704https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/8065/1/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf38d0c1f45de37741e3a4b648a6474b6fMD51THUMBNAILMercedes Cristina Rodrigues Vera.pdf.jpgMercedes Cristina Rodrigues Vera.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2870https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/8065/2/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf.jpg6422a1be449fec3baacde15fade52cf7MD52handle/80652022-08-22 18:12:08.683oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/8065Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:12:08Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The guilt in the legal separation and the divorce |
title |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
spellingShingle |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues Direito de família Culpa Separação Divórcio Culpa (Direito) -- Brasil Separacao (Direito) -- Brasil Divorcio -- Leis e legislacao -- Brasil Family law Guilt Separation Divorce CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
title_full |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
title_fullStr |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
title_full_unstemmed |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
title_sort |
A culpa na separação e no divórcio |
author |
Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Diniz, Maria Helena |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues |
contributor_str_mv |
Diniz, Maria Helena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito de família Culpa Separação Divórcio Culpa (Direito) -- Brasil Separacao (Direito) -- Brasil Divorcio -- Leis e legislacao -- Brasil |
topic |
Direito de família Culpa Separação Divórcio Culpa (Direito) -- Brasil Separacao (Direito) -- Brasil Divorcio -- Leis e legislacao -- Brasil Family law Guilt Separation Divorce CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Family law Guilt Separation Divorce |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
According to current legislation, partnerships and conjugal relations may be amicable or litigious dissolved. Since 04 Jan 2007 and after some requirements filled out, a couple that intends a divorce or an amicable separation has the extrajudicial formality as another option for reaching their aim. During the search for the roots of divorce and separation guilt, an introspection in canon and roman laws was realized. Modern law was reached as Middle Age ended. The family law received a severe influence from the protestant reform and as consequence, the secularization of law and a definitive separation of State and Church took place. In the research of guilt evolution in matrimony dissolution and under the paternal system, the first regulations were initiated, when the matrimony was still considered an indissolvable institution, and after, the divorce maked the relation rupture possible Before the promulgation of the Federal Constitution in 1988 an analysis of guilt was realized, facing the fundamental principle of human dignity and its reflex in matrimony dissolutions as well as the strengthening of the idea of conjugal life rupture and the weakness of guilt idea for judicial separations motivation. In this context, a doctrinal debate takes place considering the convenience of the guilt maintenance in the national juridical system. This questioning grows in importance as the consequences of guilt elimination in family law are analyzed, and the possibility to litigate the reparation of damages eventually suffered from the violation of matrimony duties, and understood as a necessary illicit act in the configuration of civil responsibility for moral and material damages. We may conclude by saying that the guilt strong presence in the separation acts motivation is unfeasible, at least in this present moment, for its total elimination from the national juridical scenario |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2008-06-12 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2008-05-13 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-26T20:27:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues. The guilt in the legal separation and the divorce. 2008. 236 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8065 |
identifier_str_mv |
Vera, Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues. The guilt in the legal separation and the divorce. 2008. 236 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8065 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/8065/3/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/8065/1/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/8065/2/Mercedes%20Cristina%20Rodrigues%20Vera.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
42abf527468bff6e9302187d366d0b28 38d0c1f45de37741e3a4b648a6474b6f 6422a1be449fec3baacde15fade52cf7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277936856989696 |