Judicialização como forma de efetivação do direito social à saúde

• Autor(a) principal: Fracon, Nathália Scalabrini
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/29698
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL; Direitos Fundamentais; Direito à saúde; Mínimo existencial; Reserva do possível; Sistema Único de Saúde; Direito Público subjetivo; Judicialização; Fundamental Rights; Right to health; Minimum care; Possible reservation; Health Care System; Subjective Public Right; Judicialization

The fundamental right to health is a social right of the second dimension, requiring, as such, positive attitudes from the State. But that is not enough, the right to health allows us to require abstentions from State if we consider that no one can be obligate to undergo treatment or surgeries. Health is a right for all and a State duty, that must be guaranteed through public policy, and nowadays has been much discussed the possibility of Judiciary intervention. That occurs because the Pulic Health System can ́t attend the population needs and, with that, people have had propose judicial actions intended to see their right to health become thruth. Although, there are many authors that understand that Judiciary can ́t resolve the deficiency in the provision of right to health, and in some cases can even make it worses. This discussion becomes a real confrontation based on the argument that the State must ensure the minimum care of population, and, on the other side, the allegation of the possible reservation. The Judiciary needs to answer when called up, but when asked about the right to health, is necessary to valorate if, in fact happened a lesion or threat to rights that allouds its performance in the case