Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11709 |
Resumo: | Peirce and Popper developed their philosophies in different times, and Popper had a very superficial contact with Peirce works, insufficient so that these could influence in a decisive way his thought. In spite of, both develop quite convergent theories concerning to the fallibility of the science. The present work compares some points of these two authors' theories, trying to detach their common and divergent points, above all in what it refers to the realism, that appears as necessary to the background theory of the fallibilism. The undertaken analysis allows to conclude that the background of the realism in Peirce appears in a much more solid way than in Popper, once the first faces the subject in a wider spectrum, which allows to propose solutions for problems that, for Popper, they are still considered a mystery. The including realism of Peirce strengthens his falibillism, while the realism of Popper, can t overcome the notion of the common sense, that makes his falseacionism presents gaps and inconsistencies, that are discussed during this work. So, it is concluded that the peircean fallibilism includes the Popper falseacionism, once it discusses very similar problems and it opens ways for a wider discussion and more including solutions of the problems faced by both |
id |
PUC_SP-1_69729afbf67e38342324d7e570c0a155 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/11709 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ibri, Ivo Assadhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4776333Z5Santos, José Francisco dos2016-04-27T17:27:13Z2006-06-202006-06-21Santos, José Francisco dos. Realism and fallibilism: a counterpoint between Peirce and Popper. 2006. 118 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11709Peirce and Popper developed their philosophies in different times, and Popper had a very superficial contact with Peirce works, insufficient so that these could influence in a decisive way his thought. In spite of, both develop quite convergent theories concerning to the fallibility of the science. The present work compares some points of these two authors' theories, trying to detach their common and divergent points, above all in what it refers to the realism, that appears as necessary to the background theory of the fallibilism. The undertaken analysis allows to conclude that the background of the realism in Peirce appears in a much more solid way than in Popper, once the first faces the subject in a wider spectrum, which allows to propose solutions for problems that, for Popper, they are still considered a mystery. The including realism of Peirce strengthens his falibillism, while the realism of Popper, can t overcome the notion of the common sense, that makes his falseacionism presents gaps and inconsistencies, that are discussed during this work. So, it is concluded that the peircean fallibilism includes the Popper falseacionism, once it discusses very similar problems and it opens ways for a wider discussion and more including solutions of the problems faced by bothPeirce e Popper desenvolveram suas filosofias em épocas diferentes, e Popper teve um contato muito superficial com as obras de Peirce, insuficiente para que estas pudessem influenciar de modo decisivo o seu pensamento. Não obstante, ambos desenvolvem teses bastante convergentes acerca da falibilidade da ciência. O presente trabalho compara a teoria dos dois autores, buscando destacar seus pontos em comum e suas divergências, sobretudo no que se refere ao realismo, que aparece como fundamento necessário à tese do falibilismo. A análise empreendida permite concluir que o embasamento do realismo em Peirce aparece de modo muito mais consistente que em Popper, uma vez que aquele enfrenta a questão num espectro bem mais amplo, o que o permite propor soluções para problemas que, para Popper, ainda são considerados um mistério. O realismo mais abrangente de Peirce fortalece seu falibilismo, enquanto o realismo de Popper, que não consegue superar a noção do senso comum, faz com que seu falseacionismo apresente lacunas e inconsistências, que são discutidas durante o trabalho. Assim, conclui-se que o falibilismo peirceano engloba o falseacionismo de Popper, uma vez que discute problemas muito similares e abre caminho para uma discussão mais aprofundada e para soluções mais abrangentes dos problemas enfrentados por ambosapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/24000/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em FilosofiaPUC-SPBRFilosofiaFalibilismorealismociênciametafísicaPeirce, Charles Sanders 1839-1914Popper, Karl Raymund 1902-1994RealismoFalibilidadefallibilismrealismsciencemetaphysicsCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIARealismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e PopperRealism and fallibilism: a counterpoint between Peirce and Popperinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.txtJoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain224673https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11709/3/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.txtdc414edf4a04f67553c1dfffa90bff8fMD53ORIGINALJoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdfapplication/pdf504225https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11709/1/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdfb64321575f0c0633cd31e11254e237a0MD51THUMBNAILJoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.jpgJoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11709/2/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52handle/117092022-04-27 10:18:41.866oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/11709Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-27T13:18:41Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Realism and fallibilism: a counterpoint between Peirce and Popper |
title |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
spellingShingle |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper Santos, José Francisco dos Falibilismo realismo ciência metafísica Peirce, Charles Sanders 1839-1914 Popper, Karl Raymund 1902-1994 Realismo Falibilidade fallibilism realism science metaphysics CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
title_full |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
title_fullStr |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
title_full_unstemmed |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
title_sort |
Realismo e Falibilismo: Um Contraponto entre Peirce e Popper |
author |
Santos, José Francisco dos |
author_facet |
Santos, José Francisco dos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4776333Z5 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, José Francisco dos |
contributor_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Falibilismo realismo ciência metafísica Peirce, Charles Sanders 1839-1914 Popper, Karl Raymund 1902-1994 Realismo Falibilidade |
topic |
Falibilismo realismo ciência metafísica Peirce, Charles Sanders 1839-1914 Popper, Karl Raymund 1902-1994 Realismo Falibilidade fallibilism realism science metaphysics CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
fallibilism realism science metaphysics |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
Peirce and Popper developed their philosophies in different times, and Popper had a very superficial contact with Peirce works, insufficient so that these could influence in a decisive way his thought. In spite of, both develop quite convergent theories concerning to the fallibility of the science. The present work compares some points of these two authors' theories, trying to detach their common and divergent points, above all in what it refers to the realism, that appears as necessary to the background theory of the fallibilism. The undertaken analysis allows to conclude that the background of the realism in Peirce appears in a much more solid way than in Popper, once the first faces the subject in a wider spectrum, which allows to propose solutions for problems that, for Popper, they are still considered a mystery. The including realism of Peirce strengthens his falibillism, while the realism of Popper, can t overcome the notion of the common sense, that makes his falseacionism presents gaps and inconsistencies, that are discussed during this work. So, it is concluded that the peircean fallibilism includes the Popper falseacionism, once it discusses very similar problems and it opens ways for a wider discussion and more including solutions of the problems faced by both |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2006-06-20 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2006-06-21 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-27T17:27:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Santos, José Francisco dos. Realism and fallibilism: a counterpoint between Peirce and Popper. 2006. 118 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11709 |
identifier_str_mv |
Santos, José Francisco dos. Realism and fallibilism: a counterpoint between Peirce and Popper. 2006. 118 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11709 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11709/3/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11709/1/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11709/2/JoseFranciscoDosSantos.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
dc414edf4a04f67553c1dfffa90bff8f b64321575f0c0633cd31e11254e237a0 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277909005762560 |