Um estudo sobre a obrigação alimentar do padrasto e da madrasta para com os enteados: possíveis interpretações do artigo 1.694, caput, do Código Civil

• Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Camilla Puccia de
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/31705
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO; Obrigação alimentar; Padrasto; Madrasta; Enteado; Parentesco por afinidade; Support; Stepfather; Stepmother; Stepchildren; Affinity; Kinship

Although recomposed families have been a reality in Brazil since the Divorce Law (Law no. 6.515/77) was enacted, stepfathers and stepmothers have been facing, for more than three decades, a legislative vacuum regarding their duties and rights. If before the Constitution of 1988 and the Civil Code of 2002 (Law No. 10406/02) was unanimous the understanding that a stepfather or stepmother didn’t have the obligation to support their stepchildren, with the advent of such rules, especially of the article 1.694, caput, of the aforementioned codex, part of the jurists began to question this imperative and defend an interpretation in the opposite direction, arguing the equation of affinity to other kinship. This exploratory research, based on a qualitative analysis of the doctrinal constructions produced by Brazilian civil jurists, aims to demonstrate the plausibility of the thesis that defends the existence of kinship between stepfather/stepmother and stepson/daughter able to originate the reciprocal right to support