Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/28416 |
Resumo: | The present thesis proposes to investigate Kasimir Twardowski’s interpretation of the Cartesian theory of evidence based on clear and distinct perception, together with the theory of judgments in his work Idee und Perzeption published in 1892, and to analyze certain positions taken by Twardowski in that written. These positions are relevant because they imply, in view of Franz Brentano’s philosophy, consequences in the distinction between content and object of representation in his later work Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen from 1894. This research is characterized as bibliographic research whose procedures are they are based on the logical reconstruction of the philosopher’s arguments in the aforementioned works, on the analysis and interpretation of the problems and subjects discussed. The text is structured in three chapters: the first discusses the classification of psychic phenomena into three fundamental classes: representation, judgment and love and hate, as elaborated by Franz Brentano in 1874 and resumed in 1889, and exposes, in general terms, the purpose and context of the work Psychology from an empirical point of view (1874), with a special dedication to the concepts: intentional “in-existence”, intentional reference and internal perception. The second chapter is dedicated to the work Idee und Perzeption and presents a logical and argumentative reconstruction of this writing, as well as a critical and interpretive analysis showing that Twardowski essentially disagrees with Franz Brentano’s interpretation of René Descartes’ theory of evidence. Twardowski assumes the notion of “presented object” as “immanent object” and uses the term “characteristic” (Merkmal), evidencing a link between the works Idee und Perzeption and Zur Lehre. The last chapter of the text deals with some aspects of the distinction between content and object of presentation present in Twardowski’s 1894 habilitation thesis, and analyzes to what extent this distinction can be found in his doctoral thesis on Descartes, establishing the divergences and the convergences between these two works. The lack of a detailed study in the secondary literature on Idee und Perzeption that discusses the main problems and their relationship with the work Zur Lehre justifies the existence of this research. We infer, therefore, that there is a link between the works Idee und Perzeption and Zur Lehre, due to the treatment of the concept of “characteristic”, the distinction between “being existing” and “being represented” and the reformulation of the idea of “immanent object” |
id |
PUC_SP-1_72045e8ec46bbf67d915d2f25201a1a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/28416 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Porta, Mario Ariel Gonzálezhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0864141297940508http://lattes.cnpq.br/0191920263817911Pires, Jesuino Junior2022-10-03T20:42:03Z2022-10-03T20:42:03Z2022-08-17Pires, Jesuino Junior. Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2022.https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/28416The present thesis proposes to investigate Kasimir Twardowski’s interpretation of the Cartesian theory of evidence based on clear and distinct perception, together with the theory of judgments in his work Idee und Perzeption published in 1892, and to analyze certain positions taken by Twardowski in that written. These positions are relevant because they imply, in view of Franz Brentano’s philosophy, consequences in the distinction between content and object of representation in his later work Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen from 1894. This research is characterized as bibliographic research whose procedures are they are based on the logical reconstruction of the philosopher’s arguments in the aforementioned works, on the analysis and interpretation of the problems and subjects discussed. The text is structured in three chapters: the first discusses the classification of psychic phenomena into three fundamental classes: representation, judgment and love and hate, as elaborated by Franz Brentano in 1874 and resumed in 1889, and exposes, in general terms, the purpose and context of the work Psychology from an empirical point of view (1874), with a special dedication to the concepts: intentional “in-existence”, intentional reference and internal perception. The second chapter is dedicated to the work Idee und Perzeption and presents a logical and argumentative reconstruction of this writing, as well as a critical and interpretive analysis showing that Twardowski essentially disagrees with Franz Brentano’s interpretation of René Descartes’ theory of evidence. Twardowski assumes the notion of “presented object” as “immanent object” and uses the term “characteristic” (Merkmal), evidencing a link between the works Idee und Perzeption and Zur Lehre. The last chapter of the text deals with some aspects of the distinction between content and object of presentation present in Twardowski’s 1894 habilitation thesis, and analyzes to what extent this distinction can be found in his doctoral thesis on Descartes, establishing the divergences and the convergences between these two works. The lack of a detailed study in the secondary literature on Idee und Perzeption that discusses the main problems and their relationship with the work Zur Lehre justifies the existence of this research. We infer, therefore, that there is a link between the works Idee und Perzeption and Zur Lehre, due to the treatment of the concept of “characteristic”, the distinction between “being existing” and “being represented” and the reformulation of the idea of “immanent object”A presente tese se propõe a investigar a interpretação de Kasimir Twardowski sobre a teoria cartesiana da evidência baseada na percepção clara e distinta, junto à teoria dos juízos em sua obra Idee und Perzeption publicada no ano de 1892, e analisar determinadas posições assumidas por Twardowski nesse escrito. Essas posições são relevantes pois implicam, perante a filosofia de Franz Brentano, em consequências na distinção entre conteúdo e objeto de representação em sua posterior obra Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen de 1894. Esta pesquisa se caracteriza como uma pesquisa bibliográfica cujos procedimentos se fundamentam na reconstrução lógica da argumentação do filósofo nas referidas obras, na análise e na interpretação dos problemas e dos assuntos discutidos. O texto está estruturado em três capítulos: o primeiro, discorre sobre a classificação dos fenômenos psíquicos em três classes fundamentais: representação, juízo e amor e ódio, tal como elaborada por Franz Brentano em 1874 e retomada em 1889, e expõe, em linhas gerais, o objetivo e o contexto da obra Psicologia do ponto de vista empírico (1874), com uma dedicação especial aos conceitos: “in-existência” intencional, referência intencional e a percepção interna. O segundo capítulo é dedicado à obra Idee und Perzeption e apresenta uma reconstrução lógica e argumentativa desse escrito, bem como uma análise crítica e interpretativa demostrando que Twardowski discorda essencialmente da interpretação de Franz Brentano sobre a teoria da evidência de René Descartes. Twardowski assume a noção de “objeto representado” como “objeto imanente” e utiliza o termo “característica” (Merkmal), evidenciando um vínculo entre as obras Idee und Perzeption e Zur Lehre. O último capítulo do texto trata de alguns aspectos da distinção entre conteúdo e objeto de representação presentes na tese de habilitação de 1894 de Twardowski, e analisa em que medida a referida distinção pode ser encontrada em sua tese de doutorado sobre Descartes, estabelecendo as divergências e as convergências entre as duas referidas obras. A carência de um estudo detalhado, na literatura secundária, sobre Idee und Perzeption que discuta os principais problemas e a sua relação com a obra Zur Lehre justifica a existência dessa presente pesquisa. Inferimos, assim, que há um vínculo entre as obras Idee und Perzeption e Zur Lehre, devido ao tratamento do conceito de “característica”, a distinção entre “ser existente” e “ser representado” e a reformulação da ideia de “objeto imanente”Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPESporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em FilosofiaPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e ArtesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIATwardowskiIdeia e percepçãoJuízoConteúdo e objetoTwardowskiIdea and perceptionJudgmentContent and objectPercepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPORIGINALJesuino Junior Pires.pdfapplication/pdf1107338https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/28416/1/Jesuino%20Junior%20Pires.pdfec904ad9b417e533e079adbb455e62d2MD51TEXTJesuino Junior Pires.pdf.txtJesuino Junior Pires.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain416647https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/28416/2/Jesuino%20Junior%20Pires.pdf.txt7680536331a09d3d97fe30ce2e1d2371MD52THUMBNAILJesuino Junior Pires.pdf.jpgJesuino Junior Pires.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1150https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/28416/3/Jesuino%20Junior%20Pires.pdf.jpg34eef29e93b29d1fa2098c373014f6aaMD53handle/284162022-10-04 08:53:27.591oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/28416Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-10-04T11:53:27Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
title |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
spellingShingle |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes Pires, Jesuino Junior CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA Twardowski Ideia e percepção Juízo Conteúdo e objeto Twardowski Idea and perception Judgment Content and object |
title_short |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
title_full |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
title_fullStr |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
title_sort |
Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes |
author |
Pires, Jesuino Junior |
author_facet |
Pires, Jesuino Junior |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Porta, Mario Ariel González |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0864141297940508 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0191920263817911 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pires, Jesuino Junior |
contributor_str_mv |
Porta, Mario Ariel González |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA Twardowski Ideia e percepção Juízo Conteúdo e objeto Twardowski Idea and perception Judgment Content and object |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Twardowski Ideia e percepção Juízo Conteúdo e objeto |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Twardowski Idea and perception Judgment Content and object |
description |
The present thesis proposes to investigate Kasimir Twardowski’s interpretation of the Cartesian theory of evidence based on clear and distinct perception, together with the theory of judgments in his work Idee und Perzeption published in 1892, and to analyze certain positions taken by Twardowski in that written. These positions are relevant because they imply, in view of Franz Brentano’s philosophy, consequences in the distinction between content and object of representation in his later work Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen from 1894. This research is characterized as bibliographic research whose procedures are they are based on the logical reconstruction of the philosopher’s arguments in the aforementioned works, on the analysis and interpretation of the problems and subjects discussed. The text is structured in three chapters: the first discusses the classification of psychic phenomena into three fundamental classes: representation, judgment and love and hate, as elaborated by Franz Brentano in 1874 and resumed in 1889, and exposes, in general terms, the purpose and context of the work Psychology from an empirical point of view (1874), with a special dedication to the concepts: intentional “in-existence”, intentional reference and internal perception. The second chapter is dedicated to the work Idee und Perzeption and presents a logical and argumentative reconstruction of this writing, as well as a critical and interpretive analysis showing that Twardowski essentially disagrees with Franz Brentano’s interpretation of René Descartes’ theory of evidence. Twardowski assumes the notion of “presented object” as “immanent object” and uses the term “characteristic” (Merkmal), evidencing a link between the works Idee und Perzeption and Zur Lehre. The last chapter of the text deals with some aspects of the distinction between content and object of presentation present in Twardowski’s 1894 habilitation thesis, and analyzes to what extent this distinction can be found in his doctoral thesis on Descartes, establishing the divergences and the convergences between these two works. The lack of a detailed study in the secondary literature on Idee und Perzeption that discusses the main problems and their relationship with the work Zur Lehre justifies the existence of this research. We infer, therefore, that there is a link between the works Idee und Perzeption and Zur Lehre, due to the treatment of the concept of “characteristic”, the distinction between “being existing” and “being represented” and the reformulation of the idea of “immanent object” |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-03T20:42:03Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-03T20:42:03Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Pires, Jesuino Junior. Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2022. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/28416 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pires, Jesuino Junior. Percepção e juízo: a tese de Kasimir Twardowski sobre Descartes. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2022. |
url |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/28416 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/28416/1/Jesuino%20Junior%20Pires.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/28416/2/Jesuino%20Junior%20Pires.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/28416/3/Jesuino%20Junior%20Pires.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ec904ad9b417e533e079adbb455e62d2 7680536331a09d3d97fe30ce2e1d2371 34eef29e93b29d1fa2098c373014f6aa |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277938525274112 |