Limites da atuação do juiz na apreciação e homologação do plano de recuperação judicial

• Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Alexandra Pontes Tavares de
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/33740
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PRIVADO::DIREITO CIVIL; Recuperação judicial; Plano de recuperação judicial; Poderes dos credores; Princípio da preservação da empresa; Judicial recovery; Judicial recovery plan; Powers of creditors; Principle of preservation of the company

After more than 13 years of Law 11.101/2005 - which regulates the judicial, extrajudicial and bankruptcy recovery of the businessman and the company - there have been questions about the limits of the Judge's performance, at the moment of appraisal and approval of the plan of judicial recovery (presented by the debtor) and this is the theme developed in this monograph, in light of what disciplines the principle of preservation of the company, as well as the increase of the powers granted to creditors. In this sense, three distinct situations are revealed: (1) The Judge's performance is limited, only and only, to the control of legality; (2) Intermediate acting of the Judge (called cram down); and (3) Wide and unrestricted performance of the Judge. For a better contextualization, other subjects, which are directly related to the theme of this work, were preliminarily addressed: (1) Law 11.101/2005; (2) Principle of company preservation; (3) Request for Judicial Recovery; (4) Judicial Recovery Plan; and (5) The role of creditors in Law 11.101/2005. Faced with the complex and dynamic established business relations, doctrine and jurisprudence has admitted, although in a tenuous way, signs of expansion of the radius of action of the Judges