A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10907
Resumo: The present study aims to analyze the development of early discipline of Differential and Integral Calculus in Mathematics graduation course of Universidade de São Paulo (USP) since 1934, when this institution was founded and in which the first Mathematics graduation course was implemented, until 1994, when the subject Calculus I of Teaching Course became officially different from that offered in the Bachelor. Through interviews, conducted in accordance with the methodology of Thematic Oral History, with involved people, in different years, in the process of teaching and learning of Calculus at USP, by the analysis of the textbooks contents used at different times and by the obtained data in official documents or in the researches done by other scholars, it is noticed that initially there was not in the curriculum of Mathematics course of the investigated institution a discipline called Calculus. It was implanted at USP the European model, in which the studied concepts in this discipline had been worked which formal an high level of rigor in the course of Mathematical Analysis, introduced by Italian mathematician Luigi Fantappiè in 1934 and taught to the students since they attended the higher education, by mean that followed against the historic development of Calculus and Analysis as fields of knowledge. As time passing, by didactic reasons, some professors, especially Elza Furtado Gomide, Omar Catunda e Carlos Benjamin de Lyra, were led to defend that before studying Analysis, students should go attend on initial course of Calculus, in which the concepts would be discussed with a lower level of rigor and more manipulative way, an idea that culminated in the introduction to the discipline called Differential and Integral Calculus in the Mathematics course of the institution in 1964. This discipline had been conducted essentially with analytical orientation for many years. The process of transition from Analysis to Calculus often seen as a pre-Analysis - was slow, gradual, full of comings and goings and its detail is one of the aim to this research, which focuses its attention also in the didactic concerns and levels of rigor present in different years in the discipline of Calculus I and in the textbooks used as reference by professors. For the presented analyzes it has not recourse to a general theory that establishes the study; in it chapter specific theoretical considerations referring to studied theme are searched. In the beginning, it is noticed that the professors did not accept the existence of different levels of rigor then they did not consider necessary to adequate to the target public of the discipline that was being taught. Gradually, however, the adaptation of the way how the concepts were presented became to be defended, considering the mathematic maturation of the students, the course in which the discipline was inserted and the professional profile that would like to be formed. It is noticed that the most part of manifested concern by the authors of textbooks and by the professors of analyzed discipline was strictly related with the intention of these professors and/or the authors in giving conditions to the students in order to get, in fact, comprehension of the Calculus study done in high levels of rigor and the formalism. Furthermore, it may observed that the distinction between the discipline of Calculus I for Teaching Course and Bachelor´s Degree also was given by didactical reasons: it was searched to offer to the future teachers an initial course that would enable them to review, with a way that was more suitable to the goals of higher education, concepts even studied in the Basic Education that students do not usually dominate them when they enter the university, and at the same time, introducing the specific contends of Calculus in a appropriated way to the future teacher
id PUC_SP-1_895ce3da03f987a8c77a5d96cb2e280a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/10907
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Silva, Benedito Antonio dahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4212159U6Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de2016-04-27T16:57:15Z2012-06-142012-04-12Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de. A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994. 2012. 631 f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10907The present study aims to analyze the development of early discipline of Differential and Integral Calculus in Mathematics graduation course of Universidade de São Paulo (USP) since 1934, when this institution was founded and in which the first Mathematics graduation course was implemented, until 1994, when the subject Calculus I of Teaching Course became officially different from that offered in the Bachelor. Through interviews, conducted in accordance with the methodology of Thematic Oral History, with involved people, in different years, in the process of teaching and learning of Calculus at USP, by the analysis of the textbooks contents used at different times and by the obtained data in official documents or in the researches done by other scholars, it is noticed that initially there was not in the curriculum of Mathematics course of the investigated institution a discipline called Calculus. It was implanted at USP the European model, in which the studied concepts in this discipline had been worked which formal an high level of rigor in the course of Mathematical Analysis, introduced by Italian mathematician Luigi Fantappiè in 1934 and taught to the students since they attended the higher education, by mean that followed against the historic development of Calculus and Analysis as fields of knowledge. As time passing, by didactic reasons, some professors, especially Elza Furtado Gomide, Omar Catunda e Carlos Benjamin de Lyra, were led to defend that before studying Analysis, students should go attend on initial course of Calculus, in which the concepts would be discussed with a lower level of rigor and more manipulative way, an idea that culminated in the introduction to the discipline called Differential and Integral Calculus in the Mathematics course of the institution in 1964. This discipline had been conducted essentially with analytical orientation for many years. The process of transition from Analysis to Calculus often seen as a pre-Analysis - was slow, gradual, full of comings and goings and its detail is one of the aim to this research, which focuses its attention also in the didactic concerns and levels of rigor present in different years in the discipline of Calculus I and in the textbooks used as reference by professors. For the presented analyzes it has not recourse to a general theory that establishes the study; in it chapter specific theoretical considerations referring to studied theme are searched. In the beginning, it is noticed that the professors did not accept the existence of different levels of rigor then they did not consider necessary to adequate to the target public of the discipline that was being taught. Gradually, however, the adaptation of the way how the concepts were presented became to be defended, considering the mathematic maturation of the students, the course in which the discipline was inserted and the professional profile that would like to be formed. It is noticed that the most part of manifested concern by the authors of textbooks and by the professors of analyzed discipline was strictly related with the intention of these professors and/or the authors in giving conditions to the students in order to get, in fact, comprehension of the Calculus study done in high levels of rigor and the formalism. Furthermore, it may observed that the distinction between the discipline of Calculus I for Teaching Course and Bachelor´s Degree also was given by didactical reasons: it was searched to offer to the future teachers an initial course that would enable them to review, with a way that was more suitable to the goals of higher education, concepts even studied in the Basic Education that students do not usually dominate them when they enter the university, and at the same time, introducing the specific contends of Calculus in a appropriated way to the future teacherO presente estudo tem como objetivo analisar o desenvolvimento da disciplina inicial de Cálculo Diferencial e Integral do curso de graduação em Matemática da Universidade de São Paulo, desde 1934, ano em que tal instituição foi fundada e nela foi implantado o primeiro curso superior de Matemática do país, até 1994, momento em que a disciplina de Cálculo I do curso de Licenciatura passou a ser oficialmente diferente daquela oferecida no Bacharelado. Por meio de entrevistas, realizadas de acordo com a metodologia da História Oral Temática, com pessoas envolvidas, em diferentes épocas, no processo de ensino e aprendizagem do Cálculo na USP, pela análise de livros didáticos deste conteúdo adotados em diferentes momentos e pelos dados obtidos em documentos oficiais ou em pesquisas realizadas por outros estudiosos, verifica-se que, inicialmente, não havia no currículo do curso de Matemática da instituição investigada uma disciplina chamada Cálculo Diferencial e Integral. Implantou-se na USP o modelo europeu, no qual os conceitos usualmente estudados nesta disciplina eram trabalhados, já totalmente sistematizados, de maneira bastante formal e com alto nível de rigor, no curso de Análise Matemática, introduzido pelo matemático italiano Luigi Fantappiè em 1934 e ministrado aos alunos desde o momento em que estes ingressavam no ensino superior, em uma abordagem que seguia na contramão da história da constituição do Cálculo e da Análise como campos de conhecimento. Com o passar do tempo, razões de caráter didático, levaram alguns professores, em especial Elza Furtado Gomide, Omar Catunda e Carlos Benjamin de Lyra, a defenderem que, antes de estudar Análise, os alunos deveriam passar por um curso inicial de Cálculo, no qual os conceitos fossem abordados com um nível menos elevado de rigor e de forma mais manipulativa, idéia que culminou na introdução no curso de Matemática da instituição, em 1964, de uma disciplina chamada Cálculo Diferencial e Integral que, na prática, foi conduzida ainda durante anos com uma orientação essencialmente analítica. O processo de transição de uma disciplina inicialmente de Análise para outra efetivamente de Cálculo vista com frequência como uma pré-Análise foi lento, gradual e repleto de idas e vindas, e seu detalhamento é um dos pontos-chaves desta investigação, que foca sua atenção também nas preocupações didáticas e nos níveis de rigor presentes, em diferentes épocas, nos cursos de Cálculo I da Matemática e nos manuais utilizados como referência pelos docentes dos mesmos. Para as análises apresentadas, não se recorre a uma teoria geral que embasa o estudo; em cada capítulo buscam-se considerações teóricas específicas referentes ao tema nele abordado. Percebe-se que, inicialmente, os professores não concebiam a existência de diferentes níveis de rigor e, portanto, não consideravam necessário adequá-lo ao público-alvo da disciplina que estava sendo ministrada. Paulatinamente, no entanto, passou-se a defender a adequação da forma como os conceitos eram apresentados, levando em conta a maturidade matemática dos estudantes, o curso no qual a disciplina estava inserida e o perfil do profissional que se desejava formar. Observa-se que grande parte das preocupações manifestadas pelos autores de livros-didáticos e pelos docentes da disciplina analisada esteve estreitamente relacionada com a intenção destes professores e/ou autores em dar condições aos alunos para que estes pudessem, de fato, compreender uma abordagem do Cálculo feita com níveis elevados de rigor e de formalismo. Além disso, verifica-se que a distinção entre a disciplina de Cálculo I da Licenciatura e do Bacharelado também se deu por razões didáticas: buscou-se oferecer aos licenciandos um primeiro curso que os possibilitassem rever, com uma abordagem que fosse mais adequada aos objetivos do ensino superior, conceitos já trabalhados na Educação Básica e que estes usualmente não dominam ao ingressar na universidade, e, ao mesmo tempo, introduzir os conteúdos específicos do Cálculo de forma mais apropriada ao futuro professorCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/24080/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação MatemáticaPUC-SPBREducaçãoEnsino superiorCálculoCurso de matemática da USPAnálise matemática para o cálculoHigher educationCalculusMathematics graduation course at USPMathematical analysis to calculusCNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICAA disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTGabriel Loureiro de Lima.pdf.txtGabriel Loureiro de Lima.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1247573https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10907/3/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdf.txtdf924d2efb90b80e04f0e46821994599MD53ORIGINALGabriel Loureiro de Lima.pdfapplication/pdf3610638https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10907/1/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdff6783395dc02a00068c21214ae5ab11fMD51THUMBNAILGabriel Loureiro de Lima.pdf.jpgGabriel Loureiro de Lima.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10907/2/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52handle/109072022-04-28 07:09:38.237oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/10907Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T10:09:38Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
title A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
spellingShingle A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de
Ensino superior
Cálculo
Curso de matemática da USP
Análise matemática para o cálculo
Higher education
Calculus
Mathematics graduation course at USP
Mathematical analysis to calculus
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
title_short A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
title_full A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
title_fullStr A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
title_full_unstemmed A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
title_sort A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994
author Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de
author_facet Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Silva, Benedito Antonio da
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4212159U6
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de
contributor_str_mv Silva, Benedito Antonio da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ensino superior
Cálculo
Curso de matemática da USP
Análise matemática para o cálculo
topic Ensino superior
Cálculo
Curso de matemática da USP
Análise matemática para o cálculo
Higher education
Calculus
Mathematics graduation course at USP
Mathematical analysis to calculus
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Higher education
Calculus
Mathematics graduation course at USP
Mathematical analysis to calculus
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
description The present study aims to analyze the development of early discipline of Differential and Integral Calculus in Mathematics graduation course of Universidade de São Paulo (USP) since 1934, when this institution was founded and in which the first Mathematics graduation course was implemented, until 1994, when the subject Calculus I of Teaching Course became officially different from that offered in the Bachelor. Through interviews, conducted in accordance with the methodology of Thematic Oral History, with involved people, in different years, in the process of teaching and learning of Calculus at USP, by the analysis of the textbooks contents used at different times and by the obtained data in official documents or in the researches done by other scholars, it is noticed that initially there was not in the curriculum of Mathematics course of the investigated institution a discipline called Calculus. It was implanted at USP the European model, in which the studied concepts in this discipline had been worked which formal an high level of rigor in the course of Mathematical Analysis, introduced by Italian mathematician Luigi Fantappiè in 1934 and taught to the students since they attended the higher education, by mean that followed against the historic development of Calculus and Analysis as fields of knowledge. As time passing, by didactic reasons, some professors, especially Elza Furtado Gomide, Omar Catunda e Carlos Benjamin de Lyra, were led to defend that before studying Analysis, students should go attend on initial course of Calculus, in which the concepts would be discussed with a lower level of rigor and more manipulative way, an idea that culminated in the introduction to the discipline called Differential and Integral Calculus in the Mathematics course of the institution in 1964. This discipline had been conducted essentially with analytical orientation for many years. The process of transition from Analysis to Calculus often seen as a pre-Analysis - was slow, gradual, full of comings and goings and its detail is one of the aim to this research, which focuses its attention also in the didactic concerns and levels of rigor present in different years in the discipline of Calculus I and in the textbooks used as reference by professors. For the presented analyzes it has not recourse to a general theory that establishes the study; in it chapter specific theoretical considerations referring to studied theme are searched. In the beginning, it is noticed that the professors did not accept the existence of different levels of rigor then they did not consider necessary to adequate to the target public of the discipline that was being taught. Gradually, however, the adaptation of the way how the concepts were presented became to be defended, considering the mathematic maturation of the students, the course in which the discipline was inserted and the professional profile that would like to be formed. It is noticed that the most part of manifested concern by the authors of textbooks and by the professors of analyzed discipline was strictly related with the intention of these professors and/or the authors in giving conditions to the students in order to get, in fact, comprehension of the Calculus study done in high levels of rigor and the formalism. Furthermore, it may observed that the distinction between the discipline of Calculus I for Teaching Course and Bachelor´s Degree also was given by didactical reasons: it was searched to offer to the future teachers an initial course that would enable them to review, with a way that was more suitable to the goals of higher education, concepts even studied in the Basic Education that students do not usually dominate them when they enter the university, and at the same time, introducing the specific contends of Calculus in a appropriated way to the future teacher
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-06-14
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-04-12
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-04-27T16:57:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de. A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994. 2012. 631 f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10907
identifier_str_mv Lima, Gabriel Loureiro de. A disciplina de cálculo I do curso de matemática da Universidade de São Paulo: um estudo de seu desenvolvimento, de 1934 a 1994. 2012. 631 f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10907
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação Matemática
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10907/3/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10907/1/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10907/2/Gabriel%20Loureiro%20de%20Lima.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv df924d2efb90b80e04f0e46821994599
f6783395dc02a00068c21214ae5ab11f
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1799796011120459776