Ato atentatório à dignidade da justiça

• Autor(a) principal: Scaranello, André Luiz
• Data de Publicação: 2009
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/31300
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Execução; Processo; Fase executiva; Comportamento; Exeqüente; Executado; Tipificação; Ato atentatório à dignidade da Justiça; Artigo 600 do CPC; Forma de coibição; Artigo 601 do CPC; Medida de multa; Relevação; Pursuance; Process; Executive period; Behavior; Creditor; Debtor; Typification; Act against the Justice’s dignity; Article 600 of CPC; Way of coerce; Article 601 of CPC; Standard of penalty; Relieve

The Brazilian civil suit is in a special moment passing through significant changes, aiming to build a “process of result”. Using this fresh period of the legal process, this monograph seeks – synthesizing about the way of settle conflicts of interests through the suit, particularly the pursuance one – to point the importance of the adoption of a fair, good faith and not abusive behavior by each of the parts in the executive legal procedural relationship. The debtor’s behavior receives emphasis, particularly the nominated by the lawmaker of attempting against the Justice’s dignity. It examines the standards inserts at caput and items of article 600 of the Civil Process Code, as rules that qualify the behavior of attempting against the Justice’s dignity, and the standards inserts at caput and single paragraph of article 601 of the same Code; through their the aim of the Code is coerce the debtor to give up of that unsuitable behavior that makes difficult the satisfying legal procedural relationship, and obstructs the delivery of jurisdictional provision by the State