A efetividade da tutela jurisdicional no sistema jurídico brasileiro: a racionalização normativa e o incremento da reclamação pelo CPC/2015

• Autor(a) principal: Machado, Ligia Castrillon do Carmo
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26717
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Racionalidade; Sistema jurídico brasileiro; Efetividade da tutela jurisdicional; Evolução e valorização dos precedentes pelo CPC/2015 (LGL\2015\1656); Stare decisis; Incremento substancial; Mudança de paradigma; Objetivação; Microssistema de litigiosidade repetitiva; Reclamação como instrumento de controle; O descompasso evolutivo; Critérios objetivos; Viabilidade da reclamação; Rationality; Brazilian Legal System; Effectiveness of jurisdictional protection; Use and enhancement of binding precedent on CPC/2015 (LGL\2015\1656); Stare decisis; Substantial increment; Mass litigation resolution microsystem; “Reclamação” as an effective mean; Objective criteria and practicability

This legal essay aims to emphasize the rationality of Brazilian Legal System from the effectiveness of jurisdictional protection perspective, highlighting the enhancement of binding precedent principle and “reclamação” laid down on the new code of civil procedure in force. Originally affiliated to “civil law”, which rule mainly consist on law and normative acts, the convergence of Brazilian Legal System to “common law” has been provoking doctrinal discussion about advantages and disadvantages on conflict resolution based on binding precedents and “reclamação” as an effective instrument of its practicability. However, the partial acceptance of binding precedent and its institutes is also questioned by Brazilian Courts, which are imposing excessive limits on “reclamação” cognizance, inflicting contradiction and unpredictability to new civil procedure code in force. The thesis adopted a perspective in favor of the model based on binding precedent, exposing some basis concept of stare decisis doctrine necessary to understand the conclusions below. In order to demonstrate that the positives outweigh the negatives, jurisprudence from the Superior Court will be analyzed in order to establish objective criteria for its effective use in the Court