Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6656 |
Resumo: | This study examines the role of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage as an instrument to ensure the effectiveness and the promptness of justice in the Civil Procedure Code and in the collective microsystem. Firstly, some issues involving effective access to justice are approached since they are a fundamental right which seeks to guard the existential minimum embraced by the Constitution. Among the issues investigated it is highlighted the Code of Civil Procedure and the rules involving metaindividual rights, collective tutelage and procedural techniques (cautionary and anticipatory ones as well as supplementary application of the Code of Civil Procedure in collective microsystem). As an example of differentiated tutelage on environmental law, this research addresses the approximation of substantive and procedural rights based on the principles of prevention, precaution and reparation. Specific cases serve as examples of its applicability. This study seeks to demonstrate that access to justice is only for the actual grant of substantive right postulated by the party (Article 5, XXXV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988). For this purpose, legislation must foster procedural mechanisms necessary to materially meet the required pretension, whether injunctive or final. The examination of the procedural syncretism showed that the art.273, paragraph 7, of the Code of Civil Procedure finds natural support on collective microsystem by revealing the symbiosis of procedural techniques, unveiled in the original wording of art.4 of Law 7.347/ 85. Concerning collective demands, the legal microsystem consolidated differentiated jurisdictional protection techniques, which have adapted the procedural instrument to the attainment of the substantive right. The study also addresses the reverse burden of proof (device that favors the achievement of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage), the writ or executive lato sensu nature of consumerist norms and the supplementary application of the Civil Procedure Code. It is also important to stress the collective res judicata and the limitation of cognition in order to demonstrate that the collective microsystem is a model of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, with a focus on transportation in utilibus, regarding the settlement of res judicata in the class action trial. On another level, the study shows the parity between the art.84 of the Code of Consumer Rights and art.461 of the Civil Procedure Code, for the achievement of specific enforcement or of the equivalent practical result. The study also concludes the unconstitutionality of the art.16 of the Law of Civil Action which is incompatible with the ideals of the effectiveness of jurisdictional tutelage. Therefore, within the collective scope it is designed the effectiveness of the proceedings, with the provision of mechanisms that would support the substantive law on new horizons. Thus, this research reveals how the system of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, delineated in the Civil Procedure Code and the collective microsystem, is essential for the effectiveness of justice and the achievement of beneficial outcome of the case, expected by society |
id |
PUC_SP-1_a38f340fef0cef32c36c4c69f4656a4b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/6656 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Yoshida, Consuelo Yatsuda Moromizatohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4392210U7Sarno, Paulo Alberto2016-04-26T20:23:23Z2014-12-222014-12-08Sarno, Paulo Alberto. Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo. 2014. 152 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6656This study examines the role of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage as an instrument to ensure the effectiveness and the promptness of justice in the Civil Procedure Code and in the collective microsystem. Firstly, some issues involving effective access to justice are approached since they are a fundamental right which seeks to guard the existential minimum embraced by the Constitution. Among the issues investigated it is highlighted the Code of Civil Procedure and the rules involving metaindividual rights, collective tutelage and procedural techniques (cautionary and anticipatory ones as well as supplementary application of the Code of Civil Procedure in collective microsystem). As an example of differentiated tutelage on environmental law, this research addresses the approximation of substantive and procedural rights based on the principles of prevention, precaution and reparation. Specific cases serve as examples of its applicability. This study seeks to demonstrate that access to justice is only for the actual grant of substantive right postulated by the party (Article 5, XXXV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988). For this purpose, legislation must foster procedural mechanisms necessary to materially meet the required pretension, whether injunctive or final. The examination of the procedural syncretism showed that the art.273, paragraph 7, of the Code of Civil Procedure finds natural support on collective microsystem by revealing the symbiosis of procedural techniques, unveiled in the original wording of art.4 of Law 7.347/ 85. Concerning collective demands, the legal microsystem consolidated differentiated jurisdictional protection techniques, which have adapted the procedural instrument to the attainment of the substantive right. The study also addresses the reverse burden of proof (device that favors the achievement of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage), the writ or executive lato sensu nature of consumerist norms and the supplementary application of the Civil Procedure Code. It is also important to stress the collective res judicata and the limitation of cognition in order to demonstrate that the collective microsystem is a model of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, with a focus on transportation in utilibus, regarding the settlement of res judicata in the class action trial. On another level, the study shows the parity between the art.84 of the Code of Consumer Rights and art.461 of the Civil Procedure Code, for the achievement of specific enforcement or of the equivalent practical result. The study also concludes the unconstitutionality of the art.16 of the Law of Civil Action which is incompatible with the ideals of the effectiveness of jurisdictional tutelage. Therefore, within the collective scope it is designed the effectiveness of the proceedings, with the provision of mechanisms that would support the substantive law on new horizons. Thus, this research reveals how the system of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, delineated in the Civil Procedure Code and the collective microsystem, is essential for the effectiveness of justice and the achievement of beneficial outcome of the case, expected by societyO estudo proposto investiga o papel da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada como um instrumento para garantir a efetividade e a celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo. Inicialmente, são abordadas questões envolvendo o acesso efetivo à justiça, um direito fundamental que visa ao resguardo do mínimo existencial albergado pela Carta Política. Entre os aspectos investigados, destacam-se o Código de Processo Civil e a legislação que envolve os direitos metaindividuais, a tutela coletiva e as técnicas processuais (antecipação e acautelatória e a aplicação subsidiária do Código de Processo Civil no microssistema coletivo). Como exemplo de tutela diferenciada no direito ambiental, a pesquisa aborda a aproximação dos direitos material e processual com base nos princípios da prevenção, da precaução e da reparação. Casos concretos servem como exemplo de sua aplicabilidade. O estudo procura demonstrar que o acesso à justiça ocorre apenas com a efetiva entrega do direito material postulado pela parte (art.5º, XXXV, da Constituição Federal de 1988). Para tanto, a legislação deve acolher os mecanismos processuais necessários para satisfazer materialmente a pretensão requerida, seja ela cautelar ou satisfativa. Com o exame do sincretismo processual, demonstrou-se que o art.273, §7º, do Código de Processo Civil encontra assento natural no microssistema coletivo ao revelar a simbiose de técnicas processuais, desvelada na redação original do art. 4º da Lei nº7.347/85. Quanto às demandas coletivas, o microssistema legal consolidou técnicas de tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, que adequaram o instrumento processual à consecução do direito material. O estudo aborda ainda a inversão do ônus da prova (mecanismo favorável à conquista da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada), a natureza mandamental ou executiva lato sensu das normas consumeristas e a aplicação subsidiária do Código de Processo Civil. Há também importante destaque para a coisa julgada coletiva e a limitação da cognição, de modo a demonstrar que o microssistema coletivo é um modelo de tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, com enfoque para o transporte in utilibus, no que toca à liquidação do julgado nas ações coletivas. Em outro plano, o estudo demonstra a paridade entre o art.84 do Código de Defesa do Consumidor e o art.461 do Código de Processo Civil, para a conquista da execução específica ou do resultado prático equivalente. O estudo conclui, ainda, pela inconstitucionalidade do art.16 da Lei da Ação Civil Pública, incompatível com o ideário de efetividade da tutela jurisdicional. Desenhou-se, assim, no âmbito coletivo, a efetividade do processo, com a previsão de mecanismos para amparar o direito substancial em novas frentes. Ao final, a pesquisa revela como o regime da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, estabelecido no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo, é imprescindível para a efetividade da justiça e o alcance do resultado útil do processo almejados pela sociedadeapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/15517/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBRFaculdade de DireitoEfetividadeCeleridade processualTutela jurisdicional diferenciadaMicrossistema coletivoDireitos metaindividuaisEffectivenessSpeedy proceedingsDifferentiated jurisdictional tutelageCollective microsystemMetaindividual rightsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOTutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTPaulo Alberto Sarno.pdf.txtPaulo Alberto Sarno.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain389563https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6656/3/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf.txt05c7cc1a967809caf659df63e79a1538MD53ORIGINALPaulo Alberto Sarno.pdfapplication/pdf1129443https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6656/1/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf18c2e8c5cc4eb2a1535ad3e61326a1b2MD51THUMBNAILPaulo Alberto Sarno.pdf.jpgPaulo Alberto Sarno.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6656/2/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52handle/66562022-08-22 18:11:53.556oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/6656Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:53Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
title |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
spellingShingle |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo Sarno, Paulo Alberto Efetividade Celeridade processual Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada Microssistema coletivo Direitos metaindividuais Effectiveness Speedy proceedings Differentiated jurisdictional tutelage Collective microsystem Metaindividual rights CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
title_full |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
title_fullStr |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
title_sort |
Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo |
author |
Sarno, Paulo Alberto |
author_facet |
Sarno, Paulo Alberto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Yoshida, Consuelo Yatsuda Moromizato |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4392210U7 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sarno, Paulo Alberto |
contributor_str_mv |
Yoshida, Consuelo Yatsuda Moromizato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Efetividade Celeridade processual Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada Microssistema coletivo Direitos metaindividuais |
topic |
Efetividade Celeridade processual Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada Microssistema coletivo Direitos metaindividuais Effectiveness Speedy proceedings Differentiated jurisdictional tutelage Collective microsystem Metaindividual rights CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Effectiveness Speedy proceedings Differentiated jurisdictional tutelage Collective microsystem Metaindividual rights |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
This study examines the role of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage as an instrument to ensure the effectiveness and the promptness of justice in the Civil Procedure Code and in the collective microsystem. Firstly, some issues involving effective access to justice are approached since they are a fundamental right which seeks to guard the existential minimum embraced by the Constitution. Among the issues investigated it is highlighted the Code of Civil Procedure and the rules involving metaindividual rights, collective tutelage and procedural techniques (cautionary and anticipatory ones as well as supplementary application of the Code of Civil Procedure in collective microsystem). As an example of differentiated tutelage on environmental law, this research addresses the approximation of substantive and procedural rights based on the principles of prevention, precaution and reparation. Specific cases serve as examples of its applicability. This study seeks to demonstrate that access to justice is only for the actual grant of substantive right postulated by the party (Article 5, XXXV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988). For this purpose, legislation must foster procedural mechanisms necessary to materially meet the required pretension, whether injunctive or final. The examination of the procedural syncretism showed that the art.273, paragraph 7, of the Code of Civil Procedure finds natural support on collective microsystem by revealing the symbiosis of procedural techniques, unveiled in the original wording of art.4 of Law 7.347/ 85. Concerning collective demands, the legal microsystem consolidated differentiated jurisdictional protection techniques, which have adapted the procedural instrument to the attainment of the substantive right. The study also addresses the reverse burden of proof (device that favors the achievement of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage), the writ or executive lato sensu nature of consumerist norms and the supplementary application of the Civil Procedure Code. It is also important to stress the collective res judicata and the limitation of cognition in order to demonstrate that the collective microsystem is a model of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, with a focus on transportation in utilibus, regarding the settlement of res judicata in the class action trial. On another level, the study shows the parity between the art.84 of the Code of Consumer Rights and art.461 of the Civil Procedure Code, for the achievement of specific enforcement or of the equivalent practical result. The study also concludes the unconstitutionality of the art.16 of the Law of Civil Action which is incompatible with the ideals of the effectiveness of jurisdictional tutelage. Therefore, within the collective scope it is designed the effectiveness of the proceedings, with the provision of mechanisms that would support the substantive law on new horizons. Thus, this research reveals how the system of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, delineated in the Civil Procedure Code and the collective microsystem, is essential for the effectiveness of justice and the achievement of beneficial outcome of the case, expected by society |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-22 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-08 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-26T20:23:23Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Sarno, Paulo Alberto. Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo. 2014. 152 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6656 |
identifier_str_mv |
Sarno, Paulo Alberto. Tutela jurisdicional diferenciada: instrumento para efetividade e celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo. 2014. 152 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6656 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6656/3/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6656/1/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6656/2/Paulo%20Alberto%20Sarno.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
05c7cc1a967809caf659df63e79a1538 18c2e8c5cc4eb2a1535ad3e61326a1b2 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277828929159168 |