Adoção de convenção arbitral e a origem de uma sentença judicial inexistente por falta de jurisdição

• Autor(a) principal: Steiner, Gabriela Carvalho
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/31500
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Jurisdição arbitral; Jurisdição estatal; Convenção arbitral; Autonomia do tribunal arbitral, sentença arbitral; Sentença estatal; Princípio da competênciacompetência; Sentença inexistente; Ação declaratória de inexistência; Querela nullitatis ação rescisória; Arbitration jurisdiction; State jurisdiction; Arbitration agreement; Autonomy of the arbitral tribunal; Arbitration award; State award; Principle of competencecompetence; Non-existent award, declaratory action of non-existence; Querela nullitatis rescissory action

The present work has as objective the in-depth study of the legal nature of arbitration, inquiring about the binding of the arbitration agreement to the parties, the role of the Judiciary in the arbitration procedure, the Competence-Competence Principle and its exceptions, reaching the importance of the Autonomy of the Arbitral Tribunal and the exceptionality of Jurisdictional Control. Thus, building the plot necessary to understand the non-existent state sentence due to lack of jurisdiction. Demonstrating for that the differences between the Declaratory Action of Inexistence and the Rescissory Action. The study presented here is important, due to the need to withdraw from the legal world, through the Declaratory Action of Legal Inexistence, the deception of sentence, a pronouncement that is not legally existent, as it does not contain the presupposition of existence: jurisdiction. For that, we used doctrinal and jurisprudential research, as well as an analysis of Comparative Law