A taxatividade e a interpretação extensiva do rol do Art. 1.015 do Novo Código de Processo Civil

• Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Bárbara Pupin de
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/27426
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Novo Código de Processo Civil; Agravo de instrumento

The aim of this study is to reflect on the scope of legislative change in relation to interlocutory appeal, which introduced a restricted list of interlocutory decisions that admit its pertinence (as was provided for in the Civil Procedure Code 1939). Faced with this change, we analyze the compatibility between this restricted list and extensive interpretation of the legal rule, in order to consider the admission also against others interlocutory decisions which are not covered in the list of the article 1.015 of the new CPC. On this point, it’s interesting to mention that this paper does not study and analyze all cases that are not provided for the interlocutory appeal indicated in article 1.015 and the possibility of apply ampliative interpretation in each case, since the short time of application of the new legislation, we could hardly develop all the issues involved in a satisfactory manner. Because of this, we made a methodological approach in this work and managed only the most questionable points raised by the doctrine and the law enforcers, referring to the possibility of extensive interpretation of some cases of article 1.015 to cover the interlocutory decisions that refers about (i) competence; (ii)rejection of evidences and (iii) non-application of procedural agreements between the parties. Moreover, despite the short time of validity of the new code, we consider the jurisprudence of Sao Paulo court on some cases, but certain that any side we support, the legal uncertainty is still evident and only will be overcome with the stabilization of jurisprudence