Impugnação ao cumprimento de sentença: o instituto, seus aspectos polêmicos e perspectivas

• Autor(a) principal: Debiazzi, Caio
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/29187
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Execução; Sincretismo; Impugnação; Natureza; Penhora; Hipóteses; Alimentos; Execution; Syncretism; Impugnação; Nature; Attachment; Assumptions; Alimony

The current Civil Procedure Code (“Lei 5.869 de 11 de janeiro de 1973”) has undergone gradual reforms since its initial enforcement in 1973, particularly in the execution process chapter. These reforms aimed to harmonize the cognitive, executive and preliminary injuction proceedings in a same civil procedure structure, honoring the so-called syncretic process, which may provide greater agility and efficiency in adjudication. It is in this context that “Lei 11.232/2005” was promulgated, which delivered great transformation in “execução de título judicial por quantia certa”, extinguishing its autonomy and creating the “cumprimento de sentença” in the same case-files. In other words, it is no longer necessary two distinct proceedings to satisfy the right of the party; but only the implement of executive procedures in the same case. On the same occasion, the law changed the defense of the debtor in “execução de título judicial”: what once was done by “embargos à execução” started to be done by “impugnação ao cumprimento de sentença”, a new institute created by Law. Occurs that this new defense, which is still fresh in our legal system, was not regulated in details by “Lei 11.232/2005”, so there are many important issues without a legal solution, which cause the scholars and the courts to diverge on basic issues of its procedure. Therefore, the scope of this study is to clarify the institute and try to resolve such controversies, based on a systematic interpretation the Civil Procedure Code, supported by scholars and jurisprudence. The main focus will be to study the legal nature of “impugnação”, its requirements and applicability, and also to prove the possibility of its application in case of alimony execution by expropriation of assets. Finally, the study aims to provide a perspective, when possible, about their future rules based on the New Civil Procedure Code, highlighting the changes that will take effect