O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13510
Resumo: Disagreement in oral interaction has been studied by researchers from several fields of knowledge and in different contexts. Some investigate its occurrence in casual conversation, others are concerned about disagreement in institutional talk. In Brazil, the existing studies are restricted to analyses of the organizational structure of disagreement and its position in the conversation. However, to my knowledege, except for Pertaki´s research (2005), no other proposal has dealt with examining the role played by discourse disagreement within communicative purpose. The disagreement study in daily conversations has been associated with the conversation analysis research (POMERANTZ 1984), as well as the Politeness Theory (BROWN and LEVINSON 1987). Both approaches show differences between them, but there are convergent points between them: both accept the fact that conversational exchanges strive to maintain and increase the complicity among the participants involved. However, this objective seems to happen in the conversation-among-peers data, but not in other contexts. On the other hand, the extent of face threat or dispreference involved therein is, indubitably, connected to the demands of the situational and cultural contexts of the speech event in which the act occurs (BLUM-KULKA 1997; REES-MILLER 2000). As a contribution to this study, this research examines 1043 conversational interlocutions that occurred in a meeting containing eight members of a real estate brokerage firm, in order to analyze the discourse function of the disagreement in the context of power institutionally. The study has the theoretical-methodological and interdisciplinary support formed by Conversation Analysis assumptions, Theory of Politeness (BROWN; LEVINSON, 1987), Critical Linguistics, (FOWLER et al., 1979) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (HALLIDAY, 1994; 2004). The analyses show complex sequences of disagreement made implicitly and explicitly, according to the legitimization of professional identity; the defense of personal interests and dissatisfaction with the working philosophy of the company
id PUC_SP-1_e5feca5e1f7651a136196c32f4e68b31
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/13510
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Ikeda, Sumiko Nishitanihttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4756579D6Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto2016-04-28T18:22:19Z2011-06-302011-05-23Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto. O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas. 2011. 177 f. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13510Disagreement in oral interaction has been studied by researchers from several fields of knowledge and in different contexts. Some investigate its occurrence in casual conversation, others are concerned about disagreement in institutional talk. In Brazil, the existing studies are restricted to analyses of the organizational structure of disagreement and its position in the conversation. However, to my knowledege, except for Pertaki´s research (2005), no other proposal has dealt with examining the role played by discourse disagreement within communicative purpose. The disagreement study in daily conversations has been associated with the conversation analysis research (POMERANTZ 1984), as well as the Politeness Theory (BROWN and LEVINSON 1987). Both approaches show differences between them, but there are convergent points between them: both accept the fact that conversational exchanges strive to maintain and increase the complicity among the participants involved. However, this objective seems to happen in the conversation-among-peers data, but not in other contexts. On the other hand, the extent of face threat or dispreference involved therein is, indubitably, connected to the demands of the situational and cultural contexts of the speech event in which the act occurs (BLUM-KULKA 1997; REES-MILLER 2000). As a contribution to this study, this research examines 1043 conversational interlocutions that occurred in a meeting containing eight members of a real estate brokerage firm, in order to analyze the discourse function of the disagreement in the context of power institutionally. The study has the theoretical-methodological and interdisciplinary support formed by Conversation Analysis assumptions, Theory of Politeness (BROWN; LEVINSON, 1987), Critical Linguistics, (FOWLER et al., 1979) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (HALLIDAY, 1994; 2004). The analyses show complex sequences of disagreement made implicitly and explicitly, according to the legitimization of professional identity; the defense of personal interests and dissatisfaction with the working philosophy of the companyO desacordo na interação oral tem sido objeto de estudo de pesquisadores de várias áreas do conhecimento e em diferentes contextos. Alguns investigam sua ocorrência na conversa casual; outros se preocupam com o desacordo na conversa institucional. No Brasil, os trabalhos existentes se restringem a análises da estrutura organizacional do desacordo e sua posição na conversa. Porém, pelo que nos consta, a não ser o trabalho de Petraki (2005), nenhuma proposta tem se preocupado em examinar a função discursiva desempenhada pelo desacordo no propósito comunicativo. O estudo do desacordo tem sido associado ao trabalho de Análise da Conversa (POMERANTZ 1984), bem como à Teoria da Polidez (BROWN e LEVINSON 1987). As duas abordagens apresentam diferenças entre si, mas há pontos de convergência entre elas: ambas aceitam o fato de que as trocas conversacionais esforçam-se para manter e aumentar a cumplicidade entre os participantes envolvidos. Porém, essa meta parece acontecer nos dados na conversa entre íntimos, mas não em outros contextos. Por outro lado, o grau de ameaça-a-face ou de despreferência aí envolvidos está, de modo inegável, ligado às exigências do contexto situacional e cultural do evento da fala em que o ato ocorre (BLUM-KULKA 1997; REES-MILLER 2000). Como forma de contribuir para esse estudo, esta pesquisa examina 1043 interlocuções conversacionais, ocorridas em uma reunião de trabalho entre oito membros de uma empresa de corretagem de imóveis, a fim de analisar a função discursiva do desacordo, num contexto de poder atribuído institucionalmente. O estudo tem o suporte teórico-metodológico interdisciplinar formado pelos pressupostos da Análise da Conversa; da Teoria da Polidez (BROWN; LEVINSON, 1987); da Linguística Crítica (FOWLER et al., 1979); e da Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional (HALLIDAY, 1994; 2004). As análises mostram sequências complexas de desacordo, realizadas de forma explícita e implícita, em função da legitimação de identidade profissional; da defesa de interesses pessoais; e da insatisfação com a filosofia de trabalho da empresaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/30204/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da LinguagemPUC-SPBRLingüísticaDesacordoFunção discursivaReunião de trabalhoDisagreementDiscourse functionWork meetingCNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADAO desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTLindinalva Zagoto Fernandes.pdf.txtLindinalva Zagoto Fernandes.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain382336https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13510/3/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdf.txte66af5b33aa46063dd6e0e96d584b4a1MD53ORIGINALLindinalva Zagoto Fernandes.pdfapplication/pdf1290924https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13510/1/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdfc9b0310dc577033f94a302cd943527c1MD51THUMBNAILLindinalva Zagoto Fernandes.pdf.jpgLindinalva Zagoto Fernandes.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13510/2/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52handle/135102022-04-28 10:48:15.884oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/13510Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T13:48:15Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
title O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
spellingShingle O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto
Desacordo
Função discursiva
Reunião de trabalho
Disagreement
Discourse function
Work meeting
CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA
title_short O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
title_full O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
title_fullStr O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
title_full_unstemmed O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
title_sort O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas
author Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto
author_facet Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ikeda, Sumiko Nishitani
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4756579D6
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto
contributor_str_mv Ikeda, Sumiko Nishitani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desacordo
Função discursiva
Reunião de trabalho
topic Desacordo
Função discursiva
Reunião de trabalho
Disagreement
Discourse function
Work meeting
CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Disagreement
Discourse function
Work meeting
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA::LINGUISTICA APLICADA
description Disagreement in oral interaction has been studied by researchers from several fields of knowledge and in different contexts. Some investigate its occurrence in casual conversation, others are concerned about disagreement in institutional talk. In Brazil, the existing studies are restricted to analyses of the organizational structure of disagreement and its position in the conversation. However, to my knowledege, except for Pertaki´s research (2005), no other proposal has dealt with examining the role played by discourse disagreement within communicative purpose. The disagreement study in daily conversations has been associated with the conversation analysis research (POMERANTZ 1984), as well as the Politeness Theory (BROWN and LEVINSON 1987). Both approaches show differences between them, but there are convergent points between them: both accept the fact that conversational exchanges strive to maintain and increase the complicity among the participants involved. However, this objective seems to happen in the conversation-among-peers data, but not in other contexts. On the other hand, the extent of face threat or dispreference involved therein is, indubitably, connected to the demands of the situational and cultural contexts of the speech event in which the act occurs (BLUM-KULKA 1997; REES-MILLER 2000). As a contribution to this study, this research examines 1043 conversational interlocutions that occurred in a meeting containing eight members of a real estate brokerage firm, in order to analyze the discourse function of the disagreement in the context of power institutionally. The study has the theoretical-methodological and interdisciplinary support formed by Conversation Analysis assumptions, Theory of Politeness (BROWN; LEVINSON, 1987), Critical Linguistics, (FOWLER et al., 1979) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (HALLIDAY, 1994; 2004). The analyses show complex sequences of disagreement made implicitly and explicitly, according to the legitimization of professional identity; the defense of personal interests and dissatisfaction with the working philosophy of the company
publishDate 2011
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2011-06-30
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011-05-23
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-04-28T18:22:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto. O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas. 2011. 177 f. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13510
identifier_str_mv Fernandes, Lindinalva Zagoto. O desacordo em uma reunião de trabalho: funções discursivas. 2011. 177 f. Tese (Doutorado em Lingüística) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13510
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Lingüística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13510/3/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13510/1/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/13510/2/Lindinalva%20Zagoto%20Fernandes.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e66af5b33aa46063dd6e0e96d584b4a1
c9b0310dc577033f94a302cd943527c1
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809278023523893248