Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23504
Resumo: This research aims to investigate the need and possible existence of a theoretical proposal capable of justifying a particular rationalization mode for the processing of administrative facts, proof and administrative prognosis in administrative process. The following hypothesis is formulated: if the brazilian legal system, strictly speaking, requires a format specific to the handling of administrative processes, then the Science of Law will be responsible for examining and proposing a rational theoretical construction aimed at the composition of this activity. Illustratively, we cite the Federal Constitution of 1988, which in numerous clauses explains the distinction of procedural types – legislative, administrative and judicial. In addition, several infraconstitutional laws highlight singularities in the types of proceedings under brazilian law – such as Federal Law nº 9.784/99. Therefore, if there are normative determinations, then there must be a theoretical justification capable of rationalizing the processing of administrative facts. In this light, the research is justified in view of the fact that confusions in understanding the administrative functional dynamics, as a rule, give rise to practical problems not only for Public Administration, but also for the exercise of other state competences: not by coincidence, the State stands out as a of the largest judicial litigants in Brazil. Another indication comes down to the fact that, after more than 30 years of constitutional validity, the brazilian legal system continues to incorporate laws to govern elementary actions in Public Law – as in the case of Law nº 13.655/2018. In view of the above, and especially in view of the existence of the aforementioned normative manifestations, the study proposes the following thesis: there is a rationalization proper to the administrative process, since the state action, in such cases, is guided by a phenomenon called administrative partition of the sensitive. This is characterized in the following terms: in view of the preponderant performance of Public Administration on a material plane, it partitions – participate – with the administrators the existing factual reality and, at the same time, partitions – it has for itself, exclusively – a constitutional competence decision-making. The practical application of the proposed theory is evidenced in administrative processes, since in them the State has the competence to be a party, as well as the competence to judge. The observed phenomenon indicates the need for a form of reasoning in relation to the administrative functional exercise, which ends up resulting in a unique way of fixing legal facts, examining proof and deciding administrative prognoses in administrative processes. As for the processing of the legal fact, we propose a tripartite dynamic, that is, the lato sensu fixation of the legal facts, the stricto sensu administrative fixation of the legal facts and the stricto sensu normative fixation of the relevant legal facts. Regarding the proof, we identified that its processing takes place, primarily, within the scope of the stricto sensu normative fixation of the relevant legal facts – through a parameterization determined by the legal system itself. Finally, in view of the administrative prognoses, we verify that they are conditioned to each of the dynamics previously listed, whose conclusion can be attested, for example, by examining the topic of risk management in Public Administration
id PUC_SP-1_ecb33df715de482b4614c0f39a8f39af
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/23504
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Martins, Ricardo Marcondeshttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4834309J5Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso2021-03-09T12:32:38Z2020-12-14Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso. Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas. 2020. 297 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23504This research aims to investigate the need and possible existence of a theoretical proposal capable of justifying a particular rationalization mode for the processing of administrative facts, proof and administrative prognosis in administrative process. The following hypothesis is formulated: if the brazilian legal system, strictly speaking, requires a format specific to the handling of administrative processes, then the Science of Law will be responsible for examining and proposing a rational theoretical construction aimed at the composition of this activity. Illustratively, we cite the Federal Constitution of 1988, which in numerous clauses explains the distinction of procedural types – legislative, administrative and judicial. In addition, several infraconstitutional laws highlight singularities in the types of proceedings under brazilian law – such as Federal Law nº 9.784/99. Therefore, if there are normative determinations, then there must be a theoretical justification capable of rationalizing the processing of administrative facts. In this light, the research is justified in view of the fact that confusions in understanding the administrative functional dynamics, as a rule, give rise to practical problems not only for Public Administration, but also for the exercise of other state competences: not by coincidence, the State stands out as a of the largest judicial litigants in Brazil. Another indication comes down to the fact that, after more than 30 years of constitutional validity, the brazilian legal system continues to incorporate laws to govern elementary actions in Public Law – as in the case of Law nº 13.655/2018. In view of the above, and especially in view of the existence of the aforementioned normative manifestations, the study proposes the following thesis: there is a rationalization proper to the administrative process, since the state action, in such cases, is guided by a phenomenon called administrative partition of the sensitive. This is characterized in the following terms: in view of the preponderant performance of Public Administration on a material plane, it partitions – participate – with the administrators the existing factual reality and, at the same time, partitions – it has for itself, exclusively – a constitutional competence decision-making. The practical application of the proposed theory is evidenced in administrative processes, since in them the State has the competence to be a party, as well as the competence to judge. The observed phenomenon indicates the need for a form of reasoning in relation to the administrative functional exercise, which ends up resulting in a unique way of fixing legal facts, examining proof and deciding administrative prognoses in administrative processes. As for the processing of the legal fact, we propose a tripartite dynamic, that is, the lato sensu fixation of the legal facts, the stricto sensu administrative fixation of the legal facts and the stricto sensu normative fixation of the relevant legal facts. Regarding the proof, we identified that its processing takes place, primarily, within the scope of the stricto sensu normative fixation of the relevant legal facts – through a parameterization determined by the legal system itself. Finally, in view of the administrative prognoses, we verify that they are conditioned to each of the dynamics previously listed, whose conclusion can be attested, for example, by examining the topic of risk management in Public AdministrationA presente pesquisa tem como objetivo investigar a necessidade e a possível existência de uma proposta teórica apta a justificar um modo de racionalização particular ao processamento de fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas perante processos administrativos. Formula-se a seguinte hipótese: se o ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, taxativamente, exige uma formatação própria à tramitação de processos administrativos, então à Ciência do Direito caberá o exame e a propositura de uma construção teórica racional dirigida à composição dessa atividade. Ilustrativamente citamos a Constituição Federal de 1988, que em inúmeros dispositivos explicita a distinção de tipos processuais – legislativo, administrativo e judicial. Ademais, várias legislações infraconstitucionais destacam singularidades nas espécies processuais perante o Direito pátrio – a exemplo da Lei Federal nº 9.784/99. Logo, se existem determinações normativas, então deverá existir uma justificativa teórica com aptidão para racionalizar o processamento de feitos administrativos. Nessa toada, a pesquisa se justifica tendo em vista que confusões de compreensão da dinâmica funcional administrativa, em regra, ensejam problemas práticos não somente à Administração Pública, mas também ao exercício das demais competências estatais: não por coincidência, o Estado se destaca como um dos maiores litigantes judiciais no Brasil. Outro indicativo se resume ao fato de que, após mais de 30 anos de vigência constitucional, o ordenamento jurídico brasileiro continua a incorporar legislações para reger atuações elementares ao Direito Público – a exemplo da Lei nº 13.655/2018. Diante do exposto, e principalmente tendo em vista a existência das manifestações normativas supracitadas, o estudo propõe a seguinte tese: existe uma racionalização própria ao processo administrativo, pois o agir estatal, em tais casos, é pautado por um fenômeno denominado partilha administrativa do sensível. Este se caracteriza nos seguintes termos: tendo em vista a preponderante atuação da Administração Pública em um plano material, ela partilha – comunga – com os administrados a realidade fática existente e, ao mesmo tempo, partilha – tem para si, exclusivamente – uma competência constitucional decisória. A aplicação prática da teoria proposta é evidenciada em processos administrativos, pois neles o Estado detém competência para ser parte, bem como detém competência para julgar. O fenômeno observado indica a necessidade de uma forma de raciocínio própria em relação ao exercício funcional administrativo, o que acaba por resultar em uma maneira singular de fixar fatos jurídicos, examinar provas e decidir prognoses administrativas em processos administrativos. Quanto ao processamento do fato jurídico, propomos uma dinâmica tripartite, isto é, a fixação lato sensu dos fatos jurídicos, a fixação administrativa stricto sensu dos fatos jurídicos e a fixação normativa stricto sensu dos fatos jurídicos relevantes. No tocante à prova, identificamos que o seu processamento se dá, primordialmente, no bojo da fixação normativa stricto sensu dos fatos jurídicos relevantes – através de uma parametrização determinada pelo próprio ordenamento jurídico. Finalmente, em face das prognoses administrativas, verificamos que elas estão condicionadas a cada uma das dinâmicas anteriormente elencadas, cuja conclusão pode ser atestada, por exemplo, mediante o exame do tema da gestão de riscos na Administração PúblicaConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/53286/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoFunção administrativaProcesso administrativoPartilha administrativa do sensívelAdministrative functionAdministrative procedureAdministrative partition of the sensitiveCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOPartilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTPedro Flávio Cardoso Lucena.pdf.txtPedro Flávio Cardoso Lucena.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain928848https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/4/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdf.txtef5e56a54dc239669fb44c96b990a603MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALPedro Flávio Cardoso Lucena.pdfPedro Flávio Cardoso Lucena.pdfapplication/pdf5512008https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/2/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdfaab1beef418f3dd99822cc116cdc8317MD52THUMBNAILPedro Flávio Cardoso Lucena.pdf.jpgPedro Flávio Cardoso Lucena.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/3/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD53handle/235042022-08-22 18:11:30.279oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:30Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
title Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
spellingShingle Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso
Função administrativa
Processo administrativo
Partilha administrativa do sensível
Administrative function
Administrative procedure
Administrative partition of the sensitive
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
title_full Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
title_fullStr Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
title_full_unstemmed Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
title_sort Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas
author Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso
author_facet Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Martins, Ricardo Marcondes
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4834309J5
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso
contributor_str_mv Martins, Ricardo Marcondes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Função administrativa
Processo administrativo
Partilha administrativa do sensível
topic Função administrativa
Processo administrativo
Partilha administrativa do sensível
Administrative function
Administrative procedure
Administrative partition of the sensitive
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Administrative function
Administrative procedure
Administrative partition of the sensitive
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description This research aims to investigate the need and possible existence of a theoretical proposal capable of justifying a particular rationalization mode for the processing of administrative facts, proof and administrative prognosis in administrative process. The following hypothesis is formulated: if the brazilian legal system, strictly speaking, requires a format specific to the handling of administrative processes, then the Science of Law will be responsible for examining and proposing a rational theoretical construction aimed at the composition of this activity. Illustratively, we cite the Federal Constitution of 1988, which in numerous clauses explains the distinction of procedural types – legislative, administrative and judicial. In addition, several infraconstitutional laws highlight singularities in the types of proceedings under brazilian law – such as Federal Law nº 9.784/99. Therefore, if there are normative determinations, then there must be a theoretical justification capable of rationalizing the processing of administrative facts. In this light, the research is justified in view of the fact that confusions in understanding the administrative functional dynamics, as a rule, give rise to practical problems not only for Public Administration, but also for the exercise of other state competences: not by coincidence, the State stands out as a of the largest judicial litigants in Brazil. Another indication comes down to the fact that, after more than 30 years of constitutional validity, the brazilian legal system continues to incorporate laws to govern elementary actions in Public Law – as in the case of Law nº 13.655/2018. In view of the above, and especially in view of the existence of the aforementioned normative manifestations, the study proposes the following thesis: there is a rationalization proper to the administrative process, since the state action, in such cases, is guided by a phenomenon called administrative partition of the sensitive. This is characterized in the following terms: in view of the preponderant performance of Public Administration on a material plane, it partitions – participate – with the administrators the existing factual reality and, at the same time, partitions – it has for itself, exclusively – a constitutional competence decision-making. The practical application of the proposed theory is evidenced in administrative processes, since in them the State has the competence to be a party, as well as the competence to judge. The observed phenomenon indicates the need for a form of reasoning in relation to the administrative functional exercise, which ends up resulting in a unique way of fixing legal facts, examining proof and deciding administrative prognoses in administrative processes. As for the processing of the legal fact, we propose a tripartite dynamic, that is, the lato sensu fixation of the legal facts, the stricto sensu administrative fixation of the legal facts and the stricto sensu normative fixation of the relevant legal facts. Regarding the proof, we identified that its processing takes place, primarily, within the scope of the stricto sensu normative fixation of the relevant legal facts – through a parameterization determined by the legal system itself. Finally, in view of the administrative prognoses, we verify that they are conditioned to each of the dynamics previously listed, whose conclusion can be attested, for example, by examining the topic of risk management in Public Administration
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-12-14
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-03-09T12:32:38Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso. Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas. 2020. 297 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23504
identifier_str_mv Lucena, Pedro Flávio Cardoso. Partilha administrativa do sensível: entre fatos, provas e prognoses administrativas. 2020. 297 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23504
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/4/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/2/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23504/3/Pedro%20Fl%c3%a1vio%20Cardoso%20Lucena.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ef5e56a54dc239669fb44c96b990a603
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
aab1beef418f3dd99822cc116cdc8317
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277790459002880