Condições objetivas de punibilidade na lei n° 11.101, de 9 de fevereiro de 2005: lei de falências

• Autor(a) principal: Bueno, Paulo Amador Thomaz Alves da Cunha
• Data de Publicação: 2007
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7846
• topic: Punibilidade; Falencias -- Brasil; Bankruptcy; Punishability; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

Bankruptcy is an established Commercial Law aimed at the payment of the debts of a legal entity that becomes insolvent. Historically, the establishment has always been disciplined, also by criminal regulations, whose application has constantly been object of controversies, due to the peculiar context that they used to regulate. Recently, the Brazilian legislation has had the structure of bankrupt law modified due to the publication of Law nº 11,101, of the 9th of February of 2005, statute that has substantially transformed not only the dynamics relevant to private Law, but also the systematic of the criminal part and criminal proceedings. It can be distinguished among the referred transformations , the expressed prediction that the bankruptcy statement order or the granting of any of two modalities for the company s recovery are punishable conditions in all the offenses foreseen in the same statute.(art. 180). Such disposition, inexistent in the previous legislation, is polemic, as it introduces in the legal system the debated and obscure category of punishable objective conditions, extremely criticized in the doctrine, specially for being difficult to accommodate with the principle of culpability and not for being undistinguished with clarity from the different elements in the offense structure. The objective of the research was, in this context, firstly to try to identify the characteristics of the objective punishable conditions, as they have not been done by the law, and then after that, confront them with the referred legal prediction, with the purpose of questioning their adequacy and convenience, in face of all kinds of penalties printed in the new law. In the end it seemed impracticable, mainly in face of the heterogeneous character of the offenses, as well as the warranty requirements which impart the modern criminal law