Crítica ao ativismo judicial na tutela coletiva: entre a possível judicialização e a juristocracia

• Autor(a) principal: Curtolo, Cristiane Maria de Lima
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20814
• topic: Poder judiciário e questões políticas; Separação de poderes; Juízes - Decisões; Political questions and judicial power; Separation of powers; Judge-made law; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

This paper aims to examine the issue about the (im)possibility of judicial activism in order to defend collective rights. For that, it will be presented the discution of the paradigm of law that rises after the second post-war because of the displacement of the pole of tension from the Legislative and Executive Power towards the Judiciary and the contributions of the post-positivist theory, and because of this reconfiguration, the separation of Powers will be discussed. To understand activism it will be stablished its necessary difference among politics judicialization. After identifying these phenomena and demonstrationg their differences, it´ll be examined the collective res judicata as a groundwork to anilyse manifestations in favor of judicial activism in collective process. Thus, there is going to be discussed good and bad activism. At the end it will be presented some considerations about the possibility of right answers in law as a way of denying judicial activism