"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945 |
Resumo: | This paper investigates and contrasts recurrent intensifier collocations across a corpus of EFL writing – The International Corpus of Learner English – ICLE (Granger, 1993) and The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English – MICASE (Simpson et al., 2002). It seeks to show that such recurrent collocations are an important part of writers and speakers' linguistic repertoire and that they may provide a window onto their lexicon. On general grounds, the results indicate that there is a great predominance of boosters over maximizers and that a limited number of maximizers and boosters are used in recurrent combinations. The analysis further revealed that maximizers tend to intensify non-gradable words while boosters tend to intensify gradable ones and that EFL writers' overuse of intensifiers appears to be associated with colloquial style and an exaggerated tone that is often considered to be inappropriate in formal academic texts. |
id |
PUC_SP-4_a3385a8e9bc080ab80a48ccc50182b1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37945 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-4 |
network_name_str |
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourseIntensifiersCollocationMaximizerBoosterEFL WritingAcademic Spoken Discourse.This paper investigates and contrasts recurrent intensifier collocations across a corpus of EFL writing – The International Corpus of Learner English – ICLE (Granger, 1993) and The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English – MICASE (Simpson et al., 2002). It seeks to show that such recurrent collocations are an important part of writers and speakers' linguistic repertoire and that they may provide a window onto their lexicon. On general grounds, the results indicate that there is a great predominance of boosters over maximizers and that a limited number of maximizers and boosters are used in recurrent combinations. The analysis further revealed that maximizers tend to intensify non-gradable words while boosters tend to intensify gradable ones and that EFL writers' overuse of intensifiers appears to be associated with colloquial style and an exaggerated tone that is often considered to be inappropriate in formal academic texts.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo2018-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 20 n. 2 (2004)1678-460X0102-4450reponame:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicadainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945/25639Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRecski, Leonardo Juliano2018-06-27T13:10:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37945Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/deltaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/oai||delta@pucsp.br1678-460X1678-460Xopendoar:2018-06-27T13:10:40DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
title |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
spellingShingle |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse Recski, Leonardo Juliano Intensifiers Collocation Maximizer Booster EFL Writing Academic Spoken Discourse. |
title_short |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
title_full |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
title_fullStr |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
title_sort |
"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse |
author |
Recski, Leonardo Juliano |
author_facet |
Recski, Leonardo Juliano |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Recski, Leonardo Juliano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intensifiers Collocation Maximizer Booster EFL Writing Academic Spoken Discourse. |
topic |
Intensifiers Collocation Maximizer Booster EFL Writing Academic Spoken Discourse. |
description |
This paper investigates and contrasts recurrent intensifier collocations across a corpus of EFL writing – The International Corpus of Learner English – ICLE (Granger, 1993) and The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English – MICASE (Simpson et al., 2002). It seeks to show that such recurrent collocations are an important part of writers and speakers' linguistic repertoire and that they may provide a window onto their lexicon. On general grounds, the results indicate that there is a great predominance of boosters over maximizers and that a limited number of maximizers and boosters are used in recurrent combinations. The analysis further revealed that maximizers tend to intensify non-gradable words while boosters tend to intensify gradable ones and that EFL writers' overuse of intensifiers appears to be associated with colloquial style and an exaggerated tone that is often considered to be inappropriate in formal academic texts. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945/25639 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 20 n. 2 (2004) 1678-460X 0102-4450 reponame:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada |
collection |
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||delta@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1799129302405480448 |