"… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Recski, Leonardo Juliano
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945
Resumo: This paper investigates and contrasts recurrent intensifier collocations across a corpus of EFL writing – The International Corpus of Learner English – ICLE (Granger, 1993) and The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English – MICASE (Simpson et al., 2002). It seeks to show that such recurrent collocations are an important part of writers and speakers' linguistic repertoire and that they may provide a window onto their lexicon. On general grounds, the results indicate that there is a great predominance of boosters over maximizers and that a limited number of maximizers and boosters are used in recurrent combinations. The analysis further revealed that maximizers tend to intensify non-gradable words while boosters tend to intensify gradable ones and that EFL writers' overuse of intensifiers appears to be associated with colloquial style and an exaggerated tone that is often considered to be inappropriate in formal academic texts.
id PUC_SP-4_a3385a8e9bc080ab80a48ccc50182b1d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37945
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-4
network_name_str DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
repository_id_str
spelling "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourseIntensifiersCollocationMaximizerBoosterEFL WritingAcademic Spoken Discourse.This paper investigates and contrasts recurrent intensifier collocations across a corpus of EFL writing – The International Corpus of Learner English – ICLE (Granger, 1993) and The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English – MICASE (Simpson et al., 2002). It seeks to show that such recurrent collocations are an important part of writers and speakers' linguistic repertoire and that they may provide a window onto their lexicon. On general grounds, the results indicate that there is a great predominance of boosters over maximizers and that a limited number of maximizers and boosters are used in recurrent combinations. The analysis further revealed that maximizers tend to intensify non-gradable words while boosters tend to intensify gradable ones and that EFL writers' overuse of intensifiers appears to be associated with colloquial style and an exaggerated tone that is often considered to be inappropriate in formal academic texts.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo2018-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 20 n. 2 (2004)1678-460X0102-4450reponame:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicadainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945/25639Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRecski, Leonardo Juliano2018-06-27T13:10:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37945Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/deltaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/oai||delta@pucsp.br1678-460X1678-460Xopendoar:2018-06-27T13:10:40DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
title "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
spellingShingle "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
Recski, Leonardo Juliano
Intensifiers
Collocation
Maximizer
Booster
EFL Writing
Academic Spoken Discourse.
title_short "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
title_full "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
title_fullStr "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
title_full_unstemmed "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
title_sort "… It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel …": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse
author Recski, Leonardo Juliano
author_facet Recski, Leonardo Juliano
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Recski, Leonardo Juliano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intensifiers
Collocation
Maximizer
Booster
EFL Writing
Academic Spoken Discourse.
topic Intensifiers
Collocation
Maximizer
Booster
EFL Writing
Academic Spoken Discourse.
description This paper investigates and contrasts recurrent intensifier collocations across a corpus of EFL writing – The International Corpus of Learner English – ICLE (Granger, 1993) and The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English – MICASE (Simpson et al., 2002). It seeks to show that such recurrent collocations are an important part of writers and speakers' linguistic repertoire and that they may provide a window onto their lexicon. On general grounds, the results indicate that there is a great predominance of boosters over maximizers and that a limited number of maximizers and boosters are used in recurrent combinations. The analysis further revealed that maximizers tend to intensify non-gradable words while boosters tend to intensify gradable ones and that EFL writers' overuse of intensifiers appears to be associated with colloquial style and an exaggerated tone that is often considered to be inappropriate in formal academic texts.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/37945/25639
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 20 n. 2 (2004)
1678-460X
0102-4450
reponame:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
collection DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
repository.name.fl_str_mv DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||delta@pucsp.br
_version_ 1799129302405480448