Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Bakhtiniana |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177 |
Resumo: | Based on concepts of the Bakhtin Circle, this investigation discusses the relationship between reading and writing. Based on the key concepts of dialogism, exotopy, authorship etc., it was perceived that reading and writing are kinds of social action with an ethical dimension. For the Circle, reading and writing are creative and dialogical processes, as the reader and the author enter into a deep dialogue in which positions, often in opposition, enter into confrontation. On reading a text, the reader does so based on his/her cultural repertoire, mediating the act of reading through different slants: context, gender, social group, axiology, and so forth. In this process, the reader re-creates the text based on his/her personal parameters. However, the text resists the reader, having been thought of by another person, whose axiological, temporal and contextual horizons may be different. Which is the possibility of convergence or disagreement between author and reader? The answers to this problematisation showed that the reading-writing process is made up of an ethical perspective with a dialogical base: the presence of the other occurs as alterity and, in the light of this presence, it leads to the necessity of making choices, interventions and of considering options which could destroy, carnivalise, praise, or idealize this other. The centrality of language in the establishment of the social being showed that the dialogical discourse ethics is a key concept for understanding reading and writing. |
id |
PUC_SP-6_103f4f5f99edf7fae4ab870e1eeb8392 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22177 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-6 |
network_name_str |
Bakhtiniana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin CircleEmbate dialógico entre leitura e escrita: manifestação de uma ética da ação discursiva a partir do Círculo bakhtinianoLeitura e escritaEmbate dialógicoÉtica discursivaCoautoriaReading and writingDialogic clashDiscourse ethicsCo-authorship.Based on concepts of the Bakhtin Circle, this investigation discusses the relationship between reading and writing. Based on the key concepts of dialogism, exotopy, authorship etc., it was perceived that reading and writing are kinds of social action with an ethical dimension. For the Circle, reading and writing are creative and dialogical processes, as the reader and the author enter into a deep dialogue in which positions, often in opposition, enter into confrontation. On reading a text, the reader does so based on his/her cultural repertoire, mediating the act of reading through different slants: context, gender, social group, axiology, and so forth. In this process, the reader re-creates the text based on his/her personal parameters. However, the text resists the reader, having been thought of by another person, whose axiological, temporal and contextual horizons may be different. Which is the possibility of convergence or disagreement between author and reader? The answers to this problematisation showed that the reading-writing process is made up of an ethical perspective with a dialogical base: the presence of the other occurs as alterity and, in the light of this presence, it leads to the necessity of making choices, interventions and of considering options which could destroy, carnivalise, praise, or idealize this other. The centrality of language in the establishment of the social being showed that the dialogical discourse ethics is a key concept for understanding reading and writing. Esta investigação, fundamentada em conceitos de Bahktin e Volochinov, discute a relação entre leitura e escrita. A partir dos conceitos de dialogismo, exotopia, autoria, dentre outros, percebeu-se que leitura e escrita constituem uma ação social de dimensão ética. Para o Círculo, leitura e escrita são processos criativos e dialógicos, visto que leitor e autor entram em profundo diálogo em que posições, muitas vezes díspares, se confrontam. Ao ler um texto, o leitor o faz com seu repertório cultural, mediando a leitura por vieses: contexto, gênero, classe social, axiologia, etc., recriando-o a partir dos seus parâmetros. O texto, entretanto, resiste, visto que foi concebido por outrem, cujo horizonte axiológico, temporal e contextual é outro. Qual a possibilidade de convergência e/ou discordância entre autor e leitor? As respostas a essa problematização demonstraram que o processo leitura/escrita é constituído por uma perspectiva ética de base dialógica: a presença do outro ocorre como alteridade, levando à necessidade de se fazer escolhas, intervenções, opções que podem destruir, carnavalizar, exaltar e idealizar esse outro. A centralidade da linguagem na constituição do ser social mostrou a ética discursiva dialógica como categoria fundamental para a compreensão da leitura e da escrita. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2015-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 10 № 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-362176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17075https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17076Fanini, Angela Maria Rubelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-11-06T16:08:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22177Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2016-11-06T16:08:36Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle Embate dialógico entre leitura e escrita: manifestação de uma ética da ação discursiva a partir do Círculo bakhtiniano |
title |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle |
spellingShingle |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel Leitura e escrita Embate dialógico Ética discursiva Coautoria Reading and writing Dialogic clash Discourse ethics Co-authorship. |
title_short |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle |
title_full |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle |
title_fullStr |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle |
title_sort |
Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle |
author |
Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel |
author_facet |
Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Leitura e escrita Embate dialógico Ética discursiva Coautoria Reading and writing Dialogic clash Discourse ethics Co-authorship. |
topic |
Leitura e escrita Embate dialógico Ética discursiva Coautoria Reading and writing Dialogic clash Discourse ethics Co-authorship. |
description |
Based on concepts of the Bakhtin Circle, this investigation discusses the relationship between reading and writing. Based on the key concepts of dialogism, exotopy, authorship etc., it was perceived that reading and writing are kinds of social action with an ethical dimension. For the Circle, reading and writing are creative and dialogical processes, as the reader and the author enter into a deep dialogue in which positions, often in opposition, enter into confrontation. On reading a text, the reader does so based on his/her cultural repertoire, mediating the act of reading through different slants: context, gender, social group, axiology, and so forth. In this process, the reader re-creates the text based on his/her personal parameters. However, the text resists the reader, having been thought of by another person, whose axiological, temporal and contextual horizons may be different. Which is the possibility of convergence or disagreement between author and reader? The answers to this problematisation showed that the reading-writing process is made up of an ethical perspective with a dialogical base: the presence of the other occurs as alterity and, in the light of this presence, it leads to the necessity of making choices, interventions and of considering options which could destroy, carnivalise, praise, or idealize this other. The centrality of language in the establishment of the social being showed that the dialogical discourse ethics is a key concept for understanding reading and writing. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17075 https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17076 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36 Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 10 № 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36 2176-4573 reponame:Bakhtiniana instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Bakhtiniana |
collection |
Bakhtiniana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138682391756800 |