Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Bakhtiniana
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177
Resumo: Based on concepts of the Bakhtin Circle, this investigation discusses the relationship between reading and writing. Based on the key concepts of dialogism, exotopy, authorship etc., it was perceived that reading and writing are kinds of social action with an ethical dimension. For the Circle, reading and writing are creative and dialogical processes, as the reader and the author enter into a deep dialogue in which positions, often in opposition, enter into confrontation. On reading a text, the reader does so based on his/her cultural repertoire, mediating the act of reading through different slants: context, gender, social group, axiology, and so forth. In this process, the reader re-creates the text based on his/her personal parameters. However, the text resists the reader, having been thought of by another person, whose axiological, temporal and contextual horizons may be different. Which is the possibility of convergence or disagreement between author and reader? The answers to this problematisation showed that the reading-writing process is made up of an ethical perspective with a dialogical base: the presence of the other occurs as alterity and, in the light of this presence, it leads to the necessity of making choices, interventions and of considering options which could destroy, carnivalise, praise, or idealize this other. The centrality of language in the establishment of the social being showed that the dialogical discourse ethics is a key concept for understanding reading and writing. 
id PUC_SP-6_103f4f5f99edf7fae4ab870e1eeb8392
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22177
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-6
network_name_str Bakhtiniana
repository_id_str
spelling Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin CircleEmbate dialógico entre leitura e escrita: manifestação de uma ética da ação discursiva a partir do Círculo bakhtinianoLeitura e escritaEmbate dialógicoÉtica discursivaCoautoriaReading and writingDialogic clashDiscourse ethicsCo-authorship.Based on concepts of the Bakhtin Circle, this investigation discusses the relationship between reading and writing. Based on the key concepts of dialogism, exotopy, authorship etc., it was perceived that reading and writing are kinds of social action with an ethical dimension. For the Circle, reading and writing are creative and dialogical processes, as the reader and the author enter into a deep dialogue in which positions, often in opposition, enter into confrontation. On reading a text, the reader does so based on his/her cultural repertoire, mediating the act of reading through different slants: context, gender, social group, axiology, and so forth. In this process, the reader re-creates the text based on his/her personal parameters. However, the text resists the reader, having been thought of by another person, whose axiological, temporal and contextual horizons may be different. Which is the possibility of convergence or disagreement between author and reader? The answers to this problematisation showed that the reading-writing process is made up of an ethical perspective with a dialogical base: the presence of the other occurs as alterity and, in the light of this presence, it leads to the necessity of making choices, interventions and of considering options which could destroy, carnivalise, praise, or idealize this other. The centrality of language in the establishment of the social being showed that the dialogical discourse ethics is a key concept for understanding reading and writing. Esta investigação, fundamentada em conceitos de Bahktin e Volochinov, discute a relação entre leitura e escrita. A partir dos conceitos de dialogismo, exotopia, autoria, dentre outros, percebeu-se que leitura e escrita constituem uma ação social de dimensão ética. Para o Círculo, leitura e escrita são processos criativos e dialógicos, visto que leitor e autor entram em profundo diálogo em que posições, muitas vezes díspares, se confrontam. Ao ler um texto, o leitor o faz com seu repertório cultural, mediando a leitura por vieses: contexto, gênero, classe social, axiologia, etc., recriando-o a partir dos seus parâmetros. O texto, entretanto, resiste, visto que foi concebido por outrem, cujo horizonte axiológico, temporal e contextual é outro. Qual a possibilidade de convergência e/ou discordância entre autor e leitor? As respostas a essa problematização demonstraram que o processo leitura/escrita é constituído por uma perspectiva ética de base dialógica: a presença do outro ocorre como alteridade, levando à necessidade de se fazer escolhas, intervenções, opções que podem destruir, carnavalizar, exaltar e idealizar esse outro. A centralidade da linguagem na constituição do ser social mostrou a ética discursiva dialógica como categoria fundamental para a compreensão da leitura e da escrita. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2015-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 10 № 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-362176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17075https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17076Fanini, Angela Maria Rubelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-11-06T16:08:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22177Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2016-11-06T16:08:36Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
Embate dialógico entre leitura e escrita: manifestação de uma ética da ação discursiva a partir do Círculo bakhtiniano
title Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
spellingShingle Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel
Leitura e escrita
Embate dialógico
Ética discursiva
Coautoria
Reading and writing
Dialogic clash
Discourse ethics
Co-authorship.
title_short Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
title_full Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
title_fullStr Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
title_full_unstemmed Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
title_sort Dialogic Clash between Reading and Writing: Manifestation of Discourse Ethics Based on the Bakhtin Circle
author Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel
author_facet Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fanini, Angela Maria Rubel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Leitura e escrita
Embate dialógico
Ética discursiva
Coautoria
Reading and writing
Dialogic clash
Discourse ethics
Co-authorship.
topic Leitura e escrita
Embate dialógico
Ética discursiva
Coautoria
Reading and writing
Dialogic clash
Discourse ethics
Co-authorship.
description Based on concepts of the Bakhtin Circle, this investigation discusses the relationship between reading and writing. Based on the key concepts of dialogism, exotopy, authorship etc., it was perceived that reading and writing are kinds of social action with an ethical dimension. For the Circle, reading and writing are creative and dialogical processes, as the reader and the author enter into a deep dialogue in which positions, often in opposition, enter into confrontation. On reading a text, the reader does so based on his/her cultural repertoire, mediating the act of reading through different slants: context, gender, social group, axiology, and so forth. In this process, the reader re-creates the text based on his/her personal parameters. However, the text resists the reader, having been thought of by another person, whose axiological, temporal and contextual horizons may be different. Which is the possibility of convergence or disagreement between author and reader? The answers to this problematisation showed that the reading-writing process is made up of an ethical perspective with a dialogical base: the presence of the other occurs as alterity and, in the light of this presence, it leads to the necessity of making choices, interventions and of considering options which could destroy, carnivalise, praise, or idealize this other. The centrality of language in the establishment of the social being showed that the dialogical discourse ethics is a key concept for understanding reading and writing. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17075
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/22177/17076
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 10 n. 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36
Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 10 № 2 (2015); Port. 17-35 / Eng. 17-36
2176-4573
reponame:Bakhtiniana
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Bakhtiniana
collection Bakhtiniana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138682391756800