Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Bakhtiniana |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664 |
Resumo: | This article re-examines the affinities and differences between the thought of Bakhtin and Benjamin. Both are important to that branch of contemporary philosophy which analyzes the destinies of the 20th century and belong to the present-day post-secular epoch. Both understand our world by reviewing our lived experiences, to find elements that help us evaluate it and provide an orientation for our present situation. There are similarities in the reception of their ideas. In Latin America, Bakhtin and Benjamin are frequently interpreted in a political sense and serve as a basis for thinking about historical events and the facts of contemporary culture. The works of Benjamin are more frequently published, disseminated, and commented upon than those of Bakhtin. The main focus of this article is to study how Goethe served as a catalyst or pivot for the particular illuminations of both thinkers. In this perspective, Bakhtin and Benjamin are seen as two communicating vessels, despite their differences on questions of language, the role that Kant plays in their thinking, or the texts that interested them. Bakhtin’s materialistic conception of language is quite opposed to the messianic mysticism of Benjamin. |
id |
PUC_SP-6_7c8263d7378fb10a77f164c6615f7499 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24664 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-6 |
network_name_str |
Bakhtiniana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other MattersBakhtin e Benjamin: sobre Goethe e outras questõesExperiênciaDestinoLinguagemMisticismoMaterialismoExperienceDestinyLanguageMysticismMaterialismThis article re-examines the affinities and differences between the thought of Bakhtin and Benjamin. Both are important to that branch of contemporary philosophy which analyzes the destinies of the 20th century and belong to the present-day post-secular epoch. Both understand our world by reviewing our lived experiences, to find elements that help us evaluate it and provide an orientation for our present situation. There are similarities in the reception of their ideas. In Latin America, Bakhtin and Benjamin are frequently interpreted in a political sense and serve as a basis for thinking about historical events and the facts of contemporary culture. The works of Benjamin are more frequently published, disseminated, and commented upon than those of Bakhtin. The main focus of this article is to study how Goethe served as a catalyst or pivot for the particular illuminations of both thinkers. In this perspective, Bakhtin and Benjamin are seen as two communicating vessels, despite their differences on questions of language, the role that Kant plays in their thinking, or the texts that interested them. Bakhtin’s materialistic conception of language is quite opposed to the messianic mysticism of Benjamin. Este artigo reexamina as afinidades e as diferenças entre o pensamento de Bakhtin e Benjamin. Ambos são importantes para aquele ramo da filosofia contemporânea que analisa os destinos do século XX e pertencem à época atual pós-secular. Ambos compreendem nosso mundo por meio do procedimento de revisão de nossas experiências de vida, a fim de encontrar elementos que nos ajudem a avaliá-la e fornecer uma orientação para nossa situação atual. Há semelhanças na recepção de suas ideias. Na América Latina, Bakhtin e Benjamin são frequentemente interpretados num sentido político e servem como base para se refletir sobre acontecimentos históricos e fatos da cultura contemporânea. Os trabalhos de Benjamin são mais frequentemente publicados, disseminados e comentados do que aqueles de Bakhtin. O foco principal deste artigo é estudar como Goethe serviu de catalizador ou pivô para as iluminações particulares desses dois pensadores. Nessa perspectiva, Bakhtin e Benjamin são vistos como vasos comunicantes, a despeito de suas diferenças em questões de linguagem, do papel que Kant desempenha em seus pensamentos ou dos textos que interessaram a ambos. A concepção materialista de linguagem de Bakhtin opõe-se bastante ao misticismo messiânico de Benjamin.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2015-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 11 n. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 11 № 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-1722176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPengporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18213https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18214Bubnova, Tatianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-11-06T16:10:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24664Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2016-11-06T16:10:17Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters Bakhtin e Benjamin: sobre Goethe e outras questões |
title |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters |
spellingShingle |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters Bubnova, Tatiana Experiência Destino Linguagem Misticismo Materialismo Experience Destiny Language Mysticism Materialism |
title_short |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters |
title_full |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters |
title_fullStr |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters |
title_sort |
Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters |
author |
Bubnova, Tatiana |
author_facet |
Bubnova, Tatiana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bubnova, Tatiana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Experiência Destino Linguagem Misticismo Materialismo Experience Destiny Language Mysticism Materialism |
topic |
Experiência Destino Linguagem Misticismo Materialismo Experience Destiny Language Mysticism Materialism |
description |
This article re-examines the affinities and differences between the thought of Bakhtin and Benjamin. Both are important to that branch of contemporary philosophy which analyzes the destinies of the 20th century and belong to the present-day post-secular epoch. Both understand our world by reviewing our lived experiences, to find elements that help us evaluate it and provide an orientation for our present situation. There are similarities in the reception of their ideas. In Latin America, Bakhtin and Benjamin are frequently interpreted in a political sense and serve as a basis for thinking about historical events and the facts of contemporary culture. The works of Benjamin are more frequently published, disseminated, and commented upon than those of Bakhtin. The main focus of this article is to study how Goethe served as a catalyst or pivot for the particular illuminations of both thinkers. In this perspective, Bakhtin and Benjamin are seen as two communicating vessels, despite their differences on questions of language, the role that Kant plays in their thinking, or the texts that interested them. Bakhtin’s materialistic conception of language is quite opposed to the messianic mysticism of Benjamin. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18213 https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18214 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 11 n. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172 Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 11 № 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172 2176-4573 reponame:Bakhtiniana instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Bakhtiniana |
collection |
Bakhtiniana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138682478788608 |