Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bubnova, Tatiana
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Bakhtiniana
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664
Resumo: This article re-examines the affinities and differences between the thought of Bakhtin and Benjamin. Both are important to that branch of contemporary philosophy which analyzes the destinies of the 20th century and belong to the present-day post-secular epoch. Both understand our world by reviewing our lived experiences, to find elements that help us evaluate it and provide an orientation for our present situation. There are similarities in the reception of their ideas. In Latin America, Bakhtin and Benjamin are frequently interpreted in a political sense and serve as a basis for thinking about historical events and the facts of contemporary culture. The works of Benjamin are more frequently published, disseminated, and commented upon than those of Bakhtin. The main focus of this article is to study how Goethe served as a catalyst or pivot for the particular illuminations of both thinkers. In this perspective, Bakhtin and Benjamin are seen as two communicating vessels, despite their differences on questions of language, the role that Kant plays in their thinking, or the texts that interested them. Bakhtin’s materialistic conception of language is quite opposed to the messianic mysticism of Benjamin. 
id PUC_SP-6_7c8263d7378fb10a77f164c6615f7499
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24664
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-6
network_name_str Bakhtiniana
repository_id_str
spelling Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other MattersBakhtin e Benjamin: sobre Goethe e outras questõesExperiênciaDestinoLinguagemMisticismoMaterialismoExperienceDestinyLanguageMysticismMaterialismThis article re-examines the affinities and differences between the thought of Bakhtin and Benjamin. Both are important to that branch of contemporary philosophy which analyzes the destinies of the 20th century and belong to the present-day post-secular epoch. Both understand our world by reviewing our lived experiences, to find elements that help us evaluate it and provide an orientation for our present situation. There are similarities in the reception of their ideas. In Latin America, Bakhtin and Benjamin are frequently interpreted in a political sense and serve as a basis for thinking about historical events and the facts of contemporary culture. The works of Benjamin are more frequently published, disseminated, and commented upon than those of Bakhtin. The main focus of this article is to study how Goethe served as a catalyst or pivot for the particular illuminations of both thinkers. In this perspective, Bakhtin and Benjamin are seen as two communicating vessels, despite their differences on questions of language, the role that Kant plays in their thinking, or the texts that interested them. Bakhtin’s materialistic conception of language is quite opposed to the messianic mysticism of Benjamin. Este artigo reexamina as afinidades e as diferenças entre o pensamento de Bakhtin e Benjamin. Ambos são importantes para aquele ramo da filosofia contemporânea que analisa os destinos do século XX e pertencem à época atual pós-secular. Ambos compreendem nosso mundo por meio do procedimento de revisão de nossas experiências de vida, a fim de encontrar elementos que nos ajudem a avaliá-la e fornecer uma orientação para nossa situação atual. Há semelhanças na recepção de suas ideias. Na América Latina, Bakhtin e Benjamin são frequentemente interpretados num sentido político e servem como base para se refletir sobre acontecimentos históricos e fatos da cultura contemporânea. Os trabalhos de Benjamin são mais frequentemente publicados, disseminados e comentados do que aqueles de Bakhtin. O foco principal deste artigo é estudar como Goethe serviu de catalizador ou pivô para as iluminações particulares desses dois pensadores. Nessa perspectiva, Bakhtin e Benjamin são vistos como vasos comunicantes, a despeito de suas diferenças em questões de linguagem, do papel que Kant desempenha em seus pensamentos ou dos textos que interessaram a ambos. A concepção materialista de linguagem de Bakhtin opõe-se bastante ao misticismo messiânico de Benjamin.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2015-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 11 n. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 11 № 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-1722176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPengporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18213https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18214Bubnova, Tatianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-11-06T16:10:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24664Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2016-11-06T16:10:17Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
Bakhtin e Benjamin: sobre Goethe e outras questões
title Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
spellingShingle Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
Bubnova, Tatiana
Experiência
Destino
Linguagem
Misticismo
Materialismo
Experience
Destiny
Language
Mysticism
Materialism
title_short Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
title_full Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
title_fullStr Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
title_full_unstemmed Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
title_sort Bakhtin and Benjamin: On Goethe and Other Matters
author Bubnova, Tatiana
author_facet Bubnova, Tatiana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bubnova, Tatiana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Experiência
Destino
Linguagem
Misticismo
Materialismo
Experience
Destiny
Language
Mysticism
Materialism
topic Experiência
Destino
Linguagem
Misticismo
Materialismo
Experience
Destiny
Language
Mysticism
Materialism
description This article re-examines the affinities and differences between the thought of Bakhtin and Benjamin. Both are important to that branch of contemporary philosophy which analyzes the destinies of the 20th century and belong to the present-day post-secular epoch. Both understand our world by reviewing our lived experiences, to find elements that help us evaluate it and provide an orientation for our present situation. There are similarities in the reception of their ideas. In Latin America, Bakhtin and Benjamin are frequently interpreted in a political sense and serve as a basis for thinking about historical events and the facts of contemporary culture. The works of Benjamin are more frequently published, disseminated, and commented upon than those of Bakhtin. The main focus of this article is to study how Goethe served as a catalyst or pivot for the particular illuminations of both thinkers. In this perspective, Bakhtin and Benjamin are seen as two communicating vessels, despite their differences on questions of language, the role that Kant plays in their thinking, or the texts that interested them. Bakhtin’s materialistic conception of language is quite opposed to the messianic mysticism of Benjamin. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18213
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/24664/18214
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 11 n. 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172
Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 11 № 1 (2016); Eng. 129-151 / Port. 145-172
2176-4573
reponame:Bakhtiniana
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Bakhtiniana
collection Bakhtiniana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138682478788608