Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Bakhtiniana |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855 |
Resumo: | In a democratic and pluralistic lawful society, countless clashes of opinion often give rise to heated polemics. In Brazil, the promulgation of the Biosecurity Act 2005 was followed by a wide debate about its constitutionality, especially in relation to the permission to use embryonic stem cell for research. In 2008 the Federal Supreme Court (FSC), responding to a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 3510), filed by the Prosecutor General of Brazil, found it constitutional and maintained their initial position. This decision was guided by the Rapporteur’s vote, which was preceded by a procedural report and widely presents the polemic generated by this Act. Aimimg to understand the development of the legal argumentation, this study is intended to show how the ideological sphere of law reflects and refracts this clash of opinions discursively and linguistically. In order to comprehend, analyze and interpret this text, - i.e. the vote of the rapporteur, Justice Carlos Ayres Britto, we are theoretically and methodologically grounded in the dialogical discourse analysis, which is inspired in the works of Bakhtin and the Circle, and also in the rhetoric notions of ethos and pathos. We observed that, although the legal discourse preferably seeks a consensus, it is not what always occurs. In the particular case of this article, a consensus was not reached either in the FSC or in society in general. |
id |
PUC_SP-6_d8c8ca6960d764b9b17a7e0f06afa088 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34855 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-6 |
network_name_str |
Bakhtiniana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme CourtEthos e pathos no discurso do Ministro-Relator do Supremo Tribunal FederalDiscurso jurídicoBakhtin e o CírculoRetóricaEthosPathosLegal DiscourseBakhtin and the CircleRhetoricEthosPathosIn a democratic and pluralistic lawful society, countless clashes of opinion often give rise to heated polemics. In Brazil, the promulgation of the Biosecurity Act 2005 was followed by a wide debate about its constitutionality, especially in relation to the permission to use embryonic stem cell for research. In 2008 the Federal Supreme Court (FSC), responding to a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 3510), filed by the Prosecutor General of Brazil, found it constitutional and maintained their initial position. This decision was guided by the Rapporteur’s vote, which was preceded by a procedural report and widely presents the polemic generated by this Act. Aimimg to understand the development of the legal argumentation, this study is intended to show how the ideological sphere of law reflects and refracts this clash of opinions discursively and linguistically. In order to comprehend, analyze and interpret this text, - i.e. the vote of the rapporteur, Justice Carlos Ayres Britto, we are theoretically and methodologically grounded in the dialogical discourse analysis, which is inspired in the works of Bakhtin and the Circle, and also in the rhetoric notions of ethos and pathos. We observed that, although the legal discourse preferably seeks a consensus, it is not what always occurs. In the particular case of this article, a consensus was not reached either in the FSC or in society in general. É próprio da sociedade de Direito - democrática e pluralista - os inúmeros confrontos de opinião que, muitas vezes, suscitam polêmicas acirradas. A promulgação da lei da Biossegurança, em 2005, foi seguida de um vasto debate acerca de sua constitucionalidade, especialmente em relação à liberação das pesquisas com células-tronco embrionárias. Em 2008, respondendo a uma Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI 3510), ajuizada pelo procurador-geral da República, o Supremo Tribunal Federal considerou a Lei constitucional, mantendo a posição inicial. Guiando tal decisão, o voto do relator, precedido do relatório processual, expõe amplamente a polêmica encetada. Visando à compreensão do desenvolvimento da argumentação na área jurídica, este trabalho tem como objetivo mostrar como a esfera ideológica do Direito reflete e refrata esse embate discursiva e linguisticamente. Metodológica e teoricamente, utilizaremos a análise dialógica do discurso, de inspiração na obra de Bakhtin e o Círculo, aliada a noções retóricas de ethos e pathos, na compreensão, análise e interpretação deste texto - o voto do relator Ministro Carlos Ayres Britto. Constatamos que, embora o debate jurídico busque de preferência o consenso, nem sempre isso ocorre – e não ocorreu, tanto no STF como na sociedade.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 13 № 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-1022176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24221https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24222Copyright (c) 2017 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discursoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPistori, Maria Helena Cruz2017-12-01T15:11:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34855Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2017-12-01T15:11:44Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Ethos e pathos no discurso do Ministro-Relator do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court |
spellingShingle |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz Discurso jurídico Bakhtin e o Círculo Retórica Ethos Pathos Legal Discourse Bakhtin and the Circle Rhetoric Ethos Pathos |
title_short |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court |
title_full |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court |
title_fullStr |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court |
title_sort |
Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court |
author |
Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz |
author_facet |
Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discurso jurídico Bakhtin e o Círculo Retórica Ethos Pathos Legal Discourse Bakhtin and the Circle Rhetoric Ethos Pathos |
topic |
Discurso jurídico Bakhtin e o Círculo Retórica Ethos Pathos Legal Discourse Bakhtin and the Circle Rhetoric Ethos Pathos |
description |
In a democratic and pluralistic lawful society, countless clashes of opinion often give rise to heated polemics. In Brazil, the promulgation of the Biosecurity Act 2005 was followed by a wide debate about its constitutionality, especially in relation to the permission to use embryonic stem cell for research. In 2008 the Federal Supreme Court (FSC), responding to a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 3510), filed by the Prosecutor General of Brazil, found it constitutional and maintained their initial position. This decision was guided by the Rapporteur’s vote, which was preceded by a procedural report and widely presents the polemic generated by this Act. Aimimg to understand the development of the legal argumentation, this study is intended to show how the ideological sphere of law reflects and refracts this clash of opinions discursively and linguistically. In order to comprehend, analyze and interpret this text, - i.e. the vote of the rapporteur, Justice Carlos Ayres Britto, we are theoretically and methodologically grounded in the dialogical discourse analysis, which is inspired in the works of Bakhtin and the Circle, and also in the rhetoric notions of ethos and pathos. We observed that, although the legal discourse preferably seeks a consensus, it is not what always occurs. In the particular case of this article, a consensus was not reached either in the FSC or in society in general. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24221 https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24222 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102 Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 13 № 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102 2176-4573 reponame:Bakhtiniana instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Bakhtiniana |
collection |
Bakhtiniana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138682914996224 |