Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Bakhtiniana
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855
Resumo: In a democratic and pluralistic lawful society, countless clashes of opinion often give rise to heated polemics. In Brazil, the promulgation of the Biosecurity Act 2005 was followed by a wide debate about its constitutionality, especially in relation to the permission to use embryonic stem cell for research. In 2008 the Federal Supreme Court (FSC), responding to a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 3510), filed by the Prosecutor General of Brazil, found it constitutional and maintained their initial position. This decision was guided by the Rapporteur’s vote, which was preceded by a procedural report and widely presents the polemic generated by this Act. Aimimg to understand the development of the legal argumentation, this study is intended to show how the ideological sphere of law reflects and refracts this clash of opinions discursively and linguistically. In order to comprehend, analyze and interpret this text, - i.e. the vote of the rapporteur, Justice Carlos Ayres Britto, we are theoretically and methodologically grounded in the dialogical discourse analysis, which is inspired in the works of Bakhtin and the Circle, and also in the rhetoric notions of ethos and pathos. We observed that, although the legal discourse preferably seeks a consensus, it is not what always occurs. In the particular case of this article, a consensus was not reached either in the FSC or in society in general. 
id PUC_SP-6_d8c8ca6960d764b9b17a7e0f06afa088
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34855
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-6
network_name_str Bakhtiniana
repository_id_str
spelling Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme CourtEthos e pathos no discurso do Ministro-Relator do Supremo Tribunal FederalDiscurso jurídicoBakhtin e o CírculoRetóricaEthosPathosLegal DiscourseBakhtin and the CircleRhetoricEthosPathosIn a democratic and pluralistic lawful society, countless clashes of opinion often give rise to heated polemics. In Brazil, the promulgation of the Biosecurity Act 2005 was followed by a wide debate about its constitutionality, especially in relation to the permission to use embryonic stem cell for research. In 2008 the Federal Supreme Court (FSC), responding to a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 3510), filed by the Prosecutor General of Brazil, found it constitutional and maintained their initial position. This decision was guided by the Rapporteur’s vote, which was preceded by a procedural report and widely presents the polemic generated by this Act. Aimimg to understand the development of the legal argumentation, this study is intended to show how the ideological sphere of law reflects and refracts this clash of opinions discursively and linguistically. In order to comprehend, analyze and interpret this text, - i.e. the vote of the rapporteur, Justice Carlos Ayres Britto, we are theoretically and methodologically grounded in the dialogical discourse analysis, which is inspired in the works of Bakhtin and the Circle, and also in the rhetoric notions of ethos and pathos. We observed that, although the legal discourse preferably seeks a consensus, it is not what always occurs. In the particular case of this article, a consensus was not reached either in the FSC or in society in general. É próprio da sociedade de Direito - democrática e pluralista - os inúmeros confrontos de opinião que, muitas vezes, suscitam polêmicas acirradas. A promulgação da lei da Biossegurança, em 2005, foi seguida de um vasto debate acerca de sua constitucionalidade, especialmente em relação à liberação das pesquisas com células-tronco embrionárias. Em 2008, respondendo a uma Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI 3510), ajuizada pelo procurador-geral da República, o Supremo Tribunal Federal considerou a Lei constitucional, mantendo a posição inicial. Guiando tal decisão, o voto do relator, precedido do relatório processual, expõe amplamente a polêmica encetada. Visando à compreensão do desenvolvimento da argumentação na área jurídica, este trabalho tem como objetivo mostrar como a esfera ideológica do Direito reflete e refrata esse embate discursiva e linguisticamente. Metodológica e teoricamente, utilizaremos a análise dialógica do discurso, de inspiração na obra de Bakhtin e o Círculo, aliada a noções retóricas de ethos e pathos, na compreensão, análise e interpretação deste texto - o voto do relator Ministro Carlos Ayres Britto. Constatamos que, embora o debate jurídico busque de preferência o consenso, nem sempre isso ocorre – e não ocorreu, tanto no STF como na sociedade.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 13 № 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-1022176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24221https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24222Copyright (c) 2017 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discursoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPistori, Maria Helena Cruz2017-12-01T15:11:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34855Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2017-12-01T15:11:44Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
Ethos e pathos no discurso do Ministro-Relator do Supremo Tribunal Federal
title Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
spellingShingle Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz
Discurso jurídico
Bakhtin e o Círculo
Retórica
Ethos
Pathos
Legal Discourse
Bakhtin and the Circle
Rhetoric
Ethos
Pathos
title_short Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
title_full Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
title_fullStr Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
title_full_unstemmed Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
title_sort Ethos and Pathos in Justice-Rapporteur’s Discourse in Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
author Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz
author_facet Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pistori, Maria Helena Cruz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discurso jurídico
Bakhtin e o Círculo
Retórica
Ethos
Pathos
Legal Discourse
Bakhtin and the Circle
Rhetoric
Ethos
Pathos
topic Discurso jurídico
Bakhtin e o Círculo
Retórica
Ethos
Pathos
Legal Discourse
Bakhtin and the Circle
Rhetoric
Ethos
Pathos
description In a democratic and pluralistic lawful society, countless clashes of opinion often give rise to heated polemics. In Brazil, the promulgation of the Biosecurity Act 2005 was followed by a wide debate about its constitutionality, especially in relation to the permission to use embryonic stem cell for research. In 2008 the Federal Supreme Court (FSC), responding to a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 3510), filed by the Prosecutor General of Brazil, found it constitutional and maintained their initial position. This decision was guided by the Rapporteur’s vote, which was preceded by a procedural report and widely presents the polemic generated by this Act. Aimimg to understand the development of the legal argumentation, this study is intended to show how the ideological sphere of law reflects and refracts this clash of opinions discursively and linguistically. In order to comprehend, analyze and interpret this text, - i.e. the vote of the rapporteur, Justice Carlos Ayres Britto, we are theoretically and methodologically grounded in the dialogical discourse analysis, which is inspired in the works of Bakhtin and the Circle, and also in the rhetoric notions of ethos and pathos. We observed that, although the legal discourse preferably seeks a consensus, it is not what always occurs. In the particular case of this article, a consensus was not reached either in the FSC or in society in general. 
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24221
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/34855/24222
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102
Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 13 № 1 (2018); Port. 71-93 / Eng. 76-102
2176-4573
reponame:Bakhtiniana
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Bakhtiniana
collection Bakhtiniana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138682914996224