Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brandt, Per Aage
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Galáxia (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48115
Resumo: Can semiotics theorise subjectivity? Since all communicated signs are framed by enunciation, inter-subjectivity is presupposed in semiosis, because it structures its deictic relations; but can subjectivity as such — which is a matter of cognitive psychology and phenomenology, both existential and formal — still be considered as an entity pertaining to the domain of meaning and semiosis? In this note, I present the hypothesis that semioses of different kinds gravitate around a constitutive column of meaning-making spanning from perception and symbolic-performative meaning through cogito-epistemic and diagrammatic meaning to memory and iconic-libidinal meaning. This psycho-semiotic system organizes subjectivity and orients it towards the ecological stratification of the socio-sphere, which offers the same semiotic instances, and towards communicative intersubjectivity. The opportunity to outline this psycho-semiotic architecture was given by a later de-published article in which subjectivity was derived from the semiotic generative process, and which according to my view was in trouble, as a constitution of the subject, due to its lack of ontological connections to studies of cognition and the embodied mind.
id PUC_SP-8_2c73089589ad16444f5188120fd81d50
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48115
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-8
network_name_str Galáxia (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semioticsDe la « sujétion », ou Crise de la sémiotiqueDa “sujeição”, ou Crise da semióticacogitocríticalibidosubjetividadesujeito.cogitocritiquelibidosubjectivitésujet.Can semiotics theorise subjectivity? Since all communicated signs are framed by enunciation, inter-subjectivity is presupposed in semiosis, because it structures its deictic relations; but can subjectivity as such — which is a matter of cognitive psychology and phenomenology, both existential and formal — still be considered as an entity pertaining to the domain of meaning and semiosis? In this note, I present the hypothesis that semioses of different kinds gravitate around a constitutive column of meaning-making spanning from perception and symbolic-performative meaning through cogito-epistemic and diagrammatic meaning to memory and iconic-libidinal meaning. This psycho-semiotic system organizes subjectivity and orients it towards the ecological stratification of the socio-sphere, which offers the same semiotic instances, and towards communicative intersubjectivity. The opportunity to outline this psycho-semiotic architecture was given by a later de-published article in which subjectivity was derived from the semiotic generative process, and which according to my view was in trouble, as a constitution of the subject, due to its lack of ontological connections to studies of cognition and the embodied mind.Est-ce que la sémiotique peut théoriser la subjectivité ? Etant donné que tout signe communiqué s'inscrit dans un cadre énonciatif, l'inter-subjectivité est présupposée dans la sémiosis, dont elle structure la relation déictique ; mais la subjectivité telle quelle, qui relève de la psychologie cognitive et de la phénoménologie, tant existentielle que formelle, est-elle toujours à considérer comme une entité appartenant au domaine du sens et de la sémiosis ? Dans cette note, nous avançons l'hypothèse que les sémioses gravitent autour d'une colonne allant du sens symbolico-performatif au sens iconico-libidinal, en passant par le sens cogito-épistémique lié au diagrammatisme. Ce système psycho-sémiotique organise la subjectivité en l'orientant vers la stratification écologique de la socio-sphère, qui passe par les mêmes instances sémiotiques, et vers l'inter-subjectivité communicante. L'occasion d'esquisser cette architecture psycho-sémiotique nous a été offerte par un article, maintenant dé-publié, qui dérivait la subjectivité d'un parcours génératif sémiotique, et qui se trouvait, à notre humble avis, en difficulté par rapport à la cognition et la corporéité qui doivent, ontologiquement, fonder le sujet.Pode a semiótica teorizar a subjetividade? Considerando que todo signo comunicado se inscreve em um quadro enunciativo, a intersubjetividade é pressuposta na semiose, daí ela estrutura a relação dêitica; mas será que a subjetividade tal qual, que depende da psicologia cognitiva e da fenomenologia, tanto existencial quanto formal, pode ainda ser considerada como pertencente ao domínio do sentido e da semiosis ? Nesta nota, avançamos a hipótese que as semioses gravitam em torno de uma coluna indo do sentido simbólico-performativo até o sentido icônico-libidinal, passando pelo sentido cogito-epistêmico ligado ao diagramatismo. A oportunidade de  esboçar esta arquitetura psico-semiótica foi-nos ofertada por um artigo, agora des-publicado, que derivava a subjetividade de um percurso gerativo semiótico, e que se encontrava, em nosso humilde ponto de vista, com problemas em relação à cognição e a corporeidade que devem ontologicamente fundar o sujeito.PEPG COS-PUC-SP2020-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48115Galaxia; No. 44 (2020)GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 44 (2020)1982-2553reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48115/32364Copyright (c) 2020 Galáxia. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica. ISSN 1982-2553info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrandt, Per Aage2020-07-06T17:47:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48115Revistahttps://www.pucsp.br/pos-graduacao/mestrado-e-doutorado/comunicacao-e-semioticaPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com1982-25531519-311Xopendoar:2020-07-06T17:47:44Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
De la « sujétion », ou Crise de la sémiotique
Da “sujeição”, ou Crise da semiótica
title Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
spellingShingle Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
Brandt, Per Aage
cogito
crítica
libido
subjetividade
sujeito.
cogito
critique
libido
subjectivité
sujet.
title_short Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
title_full Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
title_fullStr Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
title_full_unstemmed Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
title_sort Of “subjection”, or Crisis of semiotics
author Brandt, Per Aage
author_facet Brandt, Per Aage
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brandt, Per Aage
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cogito
crítica
libido
subjetividade
sujeito.
cogito
critique
libido
subjectivité
sujet.
topic cogito
crítica
libido
subjetividade
sujeito.
cogito
critique
libido
subjectivité
sujet.
description Can semiotics theorise subjectivity? Since all communicated signs are framed by enunciation, inter-subjectivity is presupposed in semiosis, because it structures its deictic relations; but can subjectivity as such — which is a matter of cognitive psychology and phenomenology, both existential and formal — still be considered as an entity pertaining to the domain of meaning and semiosis? In this note, I present the hypothesis that semioses of different kinds gravitate around a constitutive column of meaning-making spanning from perception and symbolic-performative meaning through cogito-epistemic and diagrammatic meaning to memory and iconic-libidinal meaning. This psycho-semiotic system organizes subjectivity and orients it towards the ecological stratification of the socio-sphere, which offers the same semiotic instances, and towards communicative intersubjectivity. The opportunity to outline this psycho-semiotic architecture was given by a later de-published article in which subjectivity was derived from the semiotic generative process, and which according to my view was in trouble, as a constitution of the subject, due to its lack of ontological connections to studies of cognition and the embodied mind.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48115
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48115/32364
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PEPG COS-PUC-SP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PEPG COS-PUC-SP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Galaxia; No. 44 (2020)
GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 44 (2020)
1982-2553
reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Galáxia (São Paulo)
collection Galáxia (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com
_version_ 1799129331846348800

Registros relacionados