Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Petitimbert, Jean-Paul
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Galáxia (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48124
Resumo: The way in which the vocation of semiotics is understood necessarily translates into how research results are articulated and formulated. If the various conceptions of the discipline that discriminate the community of semioticians were clearly brought to light by Jean-Marie Floch in the eighties, his reflection only took into account the postures adopted by each researcher but was far too brief to tackle the issue of the texts produced by them. This question is what this article attempts to provide answers to by proposing a topography of the various types of writing that can be observed in contemporary semiotic literature, taking into account a central, not to say crucial, variable when it comes to research texts, that of their intelligibility. Largely inspired by the advances proposed by Eric Landowski in terms of interactions — here understood as those that texts build between their authors and their readers — the following paper allows to identify four major writing regimes. 
id PUC_SP-8_6d49ee5f6f5e6da4ce1a8c6fa99d4c1e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48124
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-8
network_name_str Galáxia (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibilityLa sémiotique à l’épreuve de l’écrit: régimes rédactionnels et intelligibilitéSemiótica à prova da escrita: regimes redacionais e inteligibilidadeacribieatticismeautismepsittacismerégimes d’écriturerégimes d’interactionsocio-sémiotique.acribismAtticismautismpsittacismwriting regimesregimes of interactionsociosemioticsacribologiaaticismoautismopsitacismoregimes de escritaregimes de interaçãosociossemiótica.The way in which the vocation of semiotics is understood necessarily translates into how research results are articulated and formulated. If the various conceptions of the discipline that discriminate the community of semioticians were clearly brought to light by Jean-Marie Floch in the eighties, his reflection only took into account the postures adopted by each researcher but was far too brief to tackle the issue of the texts produced by them. This question is what this article attempts to provide answers to by proposing a topography of the various types of writing that can be observed in contemporary semiotic literature, taking into account a central, not to say crucial, variable when it comes to research texts, that of their intelligibility. Largely inspired by the advances proposed by Eric Landowski in terms of interactions — here understood as those that texts build between their authors and their readers — the following paper allows to identify four major writing regimes. La manière dont on comprend la vocation de la recherche en sémiotique se traduit nécessairement dans la manière dont on écrit pour rendre compte des résultats obtenus. Si les différentes conceptions de la discipline qui partagent la communauté des sémioticiens furent clairement mises au jour par Jean-Marie Floch dans les années 1980, sa trop brève réflexion ne prenait en compte que les postures adoptées par les uns et les autres mais n’abordait pas la question des textes produits par chacun. C’est à cette question que le présent article s’efforce d’apporter des éléments de réponse en proposant une topographie des divers types d’écriture observables dans l’ensemble de la littérature sémiotique contemporaine, en prenant en compte une variable cruciale quand il s’agit de recherche, celle de l’intelligibilité des exposés. Largement inspiré des avancées proposées par Eric Landowski en matière d’interactions — ici entendues comme celles que les textes construisent entre leurs auteurs et leurs lecteurs — le travail qui suit permet de dégager quatre grands régimes rédactionnels.A maneira pela qual compreendemos a vocação da pesquisa em semiótica se traduz necessariamente pela maneira pela qual se escreve para dar conta dos resultados obtidos. Se as diferentes concepções da disciplina que a comunidade de semioticistas partilha foram claramente atualizadas por Jean-Marie Floch nos anos 1980, sua muito breve reflexão só levou em conta as posturas adotadas por uns e outros, mas não abordava a questão dos textos produzidos por cada um. É a essa questão que o presente artigo se esforça para trazer elementos de resposta propondo uma topografia dos diversos tipos de escritura observáveis no conjunto da literatura semiótica contemporânea, considerando uma variável crucial quando se trata da pesquisa, aquela da inteligibilidade das exposições. Largamente inspirada nos avanços propostos por Eric Landowski em matéria de interações — aqui entendidas como aquelas que os textos constroem entre os seus autores e seus leitores — o trabalho que segue permite de formular quatro grandes regimes redacionais.PEPG COS-PUC-SP2020-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48124Galaxia; No. 44 (2020)GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 44 (2020)1982-2553reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48124/32365Copyright (c) 2020 Galáxia. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica. ISSN 1982-2553info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPetitimbert, Jean-Paul2020-07-06T17:47:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48124Revistahttps://www.pucsp.br/pos-graduacao/mestrado-e-doutorado/comunicacao-e-semioticaPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com1982-25531519-311Xopendoar:2020-07-06T17:47:44Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
La sémiotique à l’épreuve de l’écrit: régimes rédactionnels et intelligibilité
Semiótica à prova da escrita: regimes redacionais e inteligibilidade
title Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
spellingShingle Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
Petitimbert, Jean-Paul
acribie
atticisme
autisme
psittacisme
régimes d’écriture
régimes d’interaction
socio-sémiotique.
acribism
Atticism
autism
psittacism
writing regimes
regimes of interaction
sociosemiotics
acribologia
aticismo
autismo
psitacismo
regimes de escrita
regimes de interação
sociossemiótica.
title_short Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
title_full Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
title_fullStr Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
title_full_unstemmed Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
title_sort Semiotics through the test of writing: editorial regimes and intelligibility
author Petitimbert, Jean-Paul
author_facet Petitimbert, Jean-Paul
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Petitimbert, Jean-Paul
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv acribie
atticisme
autisme
psittacisme
régimes d’écriture
régimes d’interaction
socio-sémiotique.
acribism
Atticism
autism
psittacism
writing regimes
regimes of interaction
sociosemiotics
acribologia
aticismo
autismo
psitacismo
regimes de escrita
regimes de interação
sociossemiótica.
topic acribie
atticisme
autisme
psittacisme
régimes d’écriture
régimes d’interaction
socio-sémiotique.
acribism
Atticism
autism
psittacism
writing regimes
regimes of interaction
sociosemiotics
acribologia
aticismo
autismo
psitacismo
regimes de escrita
regimes de interação
sociossemiótica.
description The way in which the vocation of semiotics is understood necessarily translates into how research results are articulated and formulated. If the various conceptions of the discipline that discriminate the community of semioticians were clearly brought to light by Jean-Marie Floch in the eighties, his reflection only took into account the postures adopted by each researcher but was far too brief to tackle the issue of the texts produced by them. This question is what this article attempts to provide answers to by proposing a topography of the various types of writing that can be observed in contemporary semiotic literature, taking into account a central, not to say crucial, variable when it comes to research texts, that of their intelligibility. Largely inspired by the advances proposed by Eric Landowski in terms of interactions — here understood as those that texts build between their authors and their readers — the following paper allows to identify four major writing regimes. 
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48124
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48124
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48124/32365
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PEPG COS-PUC-SP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PEPG COS-PUC-SP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Galaxia; No. 44 (2020)
GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 44 (2020)
1982-2553
reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Galáxia (São Paulo)
collection Galáxia (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com
_version_ 1799129331848445952

Registros relacionados