Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saito, Fumikazu
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Circumscribere
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/19115
Resumo: In the first book of Magia naturalis, chapter 3, Giambattista della Porta (1535-1615) stated that natural magic was the practical part of natural philosophy. Della Porta referred to knowledge of a particular set of phenomena from which one could operate naturally. In fact Magia naturalis covers a broad spectrum of issues that include topics related to the art of distillation, perfumes, fireworks, cookery, fishing and hunting. The purpose of these subjects was to survey natural and artificial things to reproduce them. In this sense, one could say that natural magic was a type of art (techne) in the Aristotelian sense, because it implied the type of knowledge that depended on the ability of the ones who manipulated phenomena. This is why the concept of natural magic is usually closely associated with “skill.” The aim of this paper is to discuss natural magic as a science that was close in meaning to techne, because it involved a concrete sense of craftsmanship and the connotation of the ability to devise stratagems. However, once natural magic was no longer limited to intellectual or manual activity, it could not be considered a mere technical art or technical science (i.e., a technology or technique).
id PUC_SP-9_e71b652853178b3c01fdaacf3daf0e89
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19115
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-9
network_name_str Circumscribere
repository_id_str
spelling Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of natureIn the first book of Magia naturalis, chapter 3, Giambattista della Porta (1535-1615) stated that natural magic was the practical part of natural philosophy. Della Porta referred to knowledge of a particular set of phenomena from which one could operate naturally. In fact Magia naturalis covers a broad spectrum of issues that include topics related to the art of distillation, perfumes, fireworks, cookery, fishing and hunting. The purpose of these subjects was to survey natural and artificial things to reproduce them. In this sense, one could say that natural magic was a type of art (techne) in the Aristotelian sense, because it implied the type of knowledge that depended on the ability of the ones who manipulated phenomena. This is why the concept of natural magic is usually closely associated with “skill.” The aim of this paper is to discuss natural magic as a science that was close in meaning to techne, because it involved a concrete sense of craftsmanship and the connotation of the ability to devise stratagems. However, once natural magic was no longer limited to intellectual or manual activity, it could not be considered a mere technical art or technical science (i.e., a technology or technique).Centro Simão Mathias de Estudos em História da Ciência2014-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/19115Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; Vol. 14 (2014); 17-39Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; v. 14 (2014); 17-391980-7651reponame:Circumscribereinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/19115/15871Saito, Fumikazuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-10-25T00:12:12Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19115Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhcPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/oai||circumhc@pucsp.br1980-76511980-7651opendoar:2017-10-25T00:12:12Circumscribere - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
title Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
spellingShingle Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
Saito, Fumikazu
title_short Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
title_full Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
title_fullStr Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
title_full_unstemmed Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
title_sort Knowing by doing in the sixteenth century natural magic: Giambattista della Porta and the wonders of nature
author Saito, Fumikazu
author_facet Saito, Fumikazu
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saito, Fumikazu
description In the first book of Magia naturalis, chapter 3, Giambattista della Porta (1535-1615) stated that natural magic was the practical part of natural philosophy. Della Porta referred to knowledge of a particular set of phenomena from which one could operate naturally. In fact Magia naturalis covers a broad spectrum of issues that include topics related to the art of distillation, perfumes, fireworks, cookery, fishing and hunting. The purpose of these subjects was to survey natural and artificial things to reproduce them. In this sense, one could say that natural magic was a type of art (techne) in the Aristotelian sense, because it implied the type of knowledge that depended on the ability of the ones who manipulated phenomena. This is why the concept of natural magic is usually closely associated with “skill.” The aim of this paper is to discuss natural magic as a science that was close in meaning to techne, because it involved a concrete sense of craftsmanship and the connotation of the ability to devise stratagems. However, once natural magic was no longer limited to intellectual or manual activity, it could not be considered a mere technical art or technical science (i.e., a technology or technique).
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/19115
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/19115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/19115/15871
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Simão Mathias de Estudos em História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Simão Mathias de Estudos em História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; Vol. 14 (2014); 17-39
Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; v. 14 (2014); 17-39
1980-7651
reponame:Circumscribere
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Circumscribere
collection Circumscribere
repository.name.fl_str_mv Circumscribere - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||circumhc@pucsp.br
_version_ 1799128573651451904