Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zacharias, Jamile
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/3715
Resumo: This dissertation, approved by PUCRS Research Ethics Committee (CEP), under the registration CEP 11/05397 aims to analyze Porto Alegre (RS) public teachers self-image/self-esteem, self-realization and well-being/ill-being levels and identify and analyze the well-being indicators shown by those teachers, as well as to propose elements that can help to decrease the ill-being and promote the teacher well-being. Consequently, it was used a quanti-qualitative methodological approach by applying questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Regarding the quantitative research, three questionnaires were used: the Self-Image and Self-Esteem Questionnaire (STOBÄUS, 1983), the Self-Realization Questionnaire Based on the Abraham Maslow Theory and the Instrument for Assessment of Variables that are Indicators of Teacher Well-being and Ill-being (JESUS, 1998). About the qualitative research, a semi-structured interview was used (STOBÄUS; MOSQUERA; 2009) to add to the quantitative research and it was based on the Content Analysis proposed by Bardin (2010). The theoretical reference is basically grounded in the studies of Esteve (1994; 1999), Jesus (1996; 1998; 2001a; 2001b; 2002; 2004; 2007), Maslow (1991), Mosquera (1978; 1987), Mosquera and Stobäus (1996; 2006; 2008) and Stobäus (1983). On this research, it was possible to verify that, concerning the self-image/self-esteem levels, teachers interviewed in A School and C School present more positive levels whereas teachers interviewed in B School present an equivalence between the higher levels (positive) and the lower ones (negative); on the whole, the teachers interviewed present more positive levels than negative levels. About the self-realization levels, teachers interviewed in A School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and self-realization needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs; teachers interviewed in B School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and security needs and higher satisfaction levels on relationship and respect needs; teachers interviewed on C School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and security needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs; on the whole, teachers interviewed present lower satisfaction levels on physical and self-realization needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs. Concerning the teacher well-being/ill-being levels, those interviewed in A School present and equivalence between the ill-being and well-being levels, whereas those interviewed in B School and C School present more ill-being levels than well-being levels; on the whole, teachers interviewed also present higher ill-being levels. After analyzing the data obtained by the Teacher Well-Being/Ill-Being Instrument, a Psycho-pedagogical Workshop was done aiming to minimize the ill-being. Also, it was possible to identify and to analyze some teacher well-being indicators, which were separated into the following categories: Professional realization/Pleasure, Social contribution/Graduation, Recognition/Appreciation, Internal relationships and interrelationships/Affectivity and Qualification. On this research, it was verified that, in order to prevent and minimize the ill-being and to promote the teacher well-being, some intervention measures should be carried out by some sections responsible for the education, such as the State, the family and the pedagogical management. Besides, the own educator may and must invest in elements that can contribute to his own satisfaction and personal and professional realization as self-concept, self-image, self-esteem, self-realization, well-being, affectivity, coping and resilience.
id P_RS_86416bbe7e8c15b1fe0f50d1d9ba9c55
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/3715
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Stobäus, Claus DieterCPF:29347181072http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4793566H1CPF:71599240106http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4252666T4Zacharias, Jamile2015-04-14T14:23:24Z2012-03-282012-01-10ZACHARIAS, Jamile. Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre. 2012. 153 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/3715This dissertation, approved by PUCRS Research Ethics Committee (CEP), under the registration CEP 11/05397 aims to analyze Porto Alegre (RS) public teachers self-image/self-esteem, self-realization and well-being/ill-being levels and identify and analyze the well-being indicators shown by those teachers, as well as to propose elements that can help to decrease the ill-being and promote the teacher well-being. Consequently, it was used a quanti-qualitative methodological approach by applying questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Regarding the quantitative research, three questionnaires were used: the Self-Image and Self-Esteem Questionnaire (STOBÄUS, 1983), the Self-Realization Questionnaire Based on the Abraham Maslow Theory and the Instrument for Assessment of Variables that are Indicators of Teacher Well-being and Ill-being (JESUS, 1998). About the qualitative research, a semi-structured interview was used (STOBÄUS; MOSQUERA; 2009) to add to the quantitative research and it was based on the Content Analysis proposed by Bardin (2010). The theoretical reference is basically grounded in the studies of Esteve (1994; 1999), Jesus (1996; 1998; 2001a; 2001b; 2002; 2004; 2007), Maslow (1991), Mosquera (1978; 1987), Mosquera and Stobäus (1996; 2006; 2008) and Stobäus (1983). On this research, it was possible to verify that, concerning the self-image/self-esteem levels, teachers interviewed in A School and C School present more positive levels whereas teachers interviewed in B School present an equivalence between the higher levels (positive) and the lower ones (negative); on the whole, the teachers interviewed present more positive levels than negative levels. About the self-realization levels, teachers interviewed in A School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and self-realization needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs; teachers interviewed in B School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and security needs and higher satisfaction levels on relationship and respect needs; teachers interviewed on C School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and security needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs; on the whole, teachers interviewed present lower satisfaction levels on physical and self-realization needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs. Concerning the teacher well-being/ill-being levels, those interviewed in A School present and equivalence between the ill-being and well-being levels, whereas those interviewed in B School and C School present more ill-being levels than well-being levels; on the whole, teachers interviewed also present higher ill-being levels. After analyzing the data obtained by the Teacher Well-Being/Ill-Being Instrument, a Psycho-pedagogical Workshop was done aiming to minimize the ill-being. Also, it was possible to identify and to analyze some teacher well-being indicators, which were separated into the following categories: Professional realization/Pleasure, Social contribution/Graduation, Recognition/Appreciation, Internal relationships and interrelationships/Affectivity and Qualification. On this research, it was verified that, in order to prevent and minimize the ill-being and to promote the teacher well-being, some intervention measures should be carried out by some sections responsible for the education, such as the State, the family and the pedagogical management. Besides, the own educator may and must invest in elements that can contribute to his own satisfaction and personal and professional realization as self-concept, self-image, self-esteem, self-realization, well-being, affectivity, coping and resilience.A presente dissertação, aprovada pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa (CEP) da PUCRS, sob registro CEP 11/05397, teve como objetivo analisar os níveis de autoimagem/autoestima, autorrealização e mal/bem-estar, e identificar e analisar os indicadores de bem-estar apresentados por docentes de escolas estaduais de Porto Alegre (RS), bem como propor elementos que possam contribuir para a diminuição do mal-estar e a promoção do bem-estar docente. Para tanto, foi utilizada uma abordagem metodológica quanti-qualitativa, por meio de respostas a questionários e entrevista semiestruturada. Para a parte quantitativa foram utilizados três questionários: Questionário de Autoimagem e Autoestima (STOBÄUS, 1983), Questionário de Autorrealização Baseado na Teoria de Abraham Maslow e Instrumento para Avaliação das Variáveis que Constituem Indicadores do Bem/Mal-Estar Docente (JESUS, 1998). Para a parte qualitativa foi utilizada uma entrevista semiestruturada (STOBÄUS; MOSQUERA; 2009) como complementar a parte quantitativa, sendo trabalhada com base na Análise de Conteúdo proposta por Bardin (2010). O Referencial Teórico está fundamentado, basicamente, nos estudos de Esteve (1994; 1999), Jesus (1996; 1998; 2001a; 2001b; 2002; 2004; 2007), Maslow (1991), Mosquera (1978; 1987), Mosquera e Stobäus (1996; 2006; 2008) e Stobäus (1983). Nesta pesquisa foi possível verificar que, com relação aos níveis de autoimagem e autoestima, os professores pesquisados na Escola A e os professores pesquisados na Escola C apresentam níveis mais positivos, enquanto que os professores pesquisados na Escola B apresentam uma equivalência entre níveis mais altos (positivos) e mais baixos (negativos); no total, os professores pesquisados apresentam níveis mais positivos do que negativos. No que se refere aos níveis de autorrealização, os professores pesquisados na Escola A apresentam níveis menos satisfeitos nas necessidades físicas e de autorrealização, e níveis mais satisfeitos nas necessidades de respeito e de relacionamento; os professores pesquisados na Escola B apresentam níveis menos satisfeitos nas necessidades físicas e de segurança, e níveis mais satisfeitos nas necessidades de relacionamento e de respeito; os professores pesquisados na Escola C apresentam níveis menos satisfeitos nas necessidades físicas e de segurança, e níveis mais satisfeitos nas necessidades de respeito e de relacionamento; no total, os professores pesquisados apresentam níveis menos satisfeitos nas necessidades físicas e de autorrealização, e níveis mais satisfeitos nas necessidades de respeito e de relacionamento. Com relação aos níveis de mal/bem-estar docente, os professores pesquisados na Escola A apresentam uma equivalência entre níveis de mal-estar e de bem- estar, enquanto que os professores pesquisados na Escola B e os professores pesquisados na Escola C apresentam mais níveis de mal-estar do que de bem-estar; no total, os professores pesquisados também apresentam níveis de mal-estar mais elevados. Após análise dos dados obtidos pelo Instrumento de Bem/Mal-Estar Docente foi realizada uma Oficina Psicopedagógica visando a minimização do mal-estar. Também foi possível identificar e analisar alguns indicadores de bem-estar docente, os quais foram encaixados nas seguintes categorias: Realização profissional/Prazer; Contribuição social/Formação; Reconhecimento/Valorização; Relações intra e interpessoais/Afetividade; e Qualificação. Neste estudo, foi constatado que, para que se possa prevenir e diminuir o mal-estar e promover o bem-estar docente, algumas medidas de intervenção devem ser tomadas por parte de alguns setores responsáveis pela educação, como o Estado, a família e a gestão pedagógica. Ademais, o próprio educador pode e deve investir em alguns elementos que podem contribuir para sua satisfação e realização pessoal e profissional, como o autoconceito, a autoimagem, a autoestima, a autorrealização, o bem-estar, a afetividade, o coping e a resiliência.Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:23:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 437549.pdf: 1881346 bytes, checksum: 4e20087da368cfbfbaeb605215a1a748 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-01-10application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/13469/437549.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em EducaçãoPUCRSBRFaculdade de EducaçEDUCAÇÃOBEM-ESTAR PESSOALPROFESSORES - ATUAÇÃO PROFISSIONALSATISFAÇÃO NO TRABALHOAFETIVIDADERESILIÊNCIA (TRAÇO DE PERSONALIDADE)CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOBem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-84512857932284779375006007024413195758546274info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAIL437549.pdf.jpg437549.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg2363http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/3715/3/437549.pdf.jpge2ee8c00bd9aef27e21c51a4ce12fd2cMD53TEXT437549.pdf.txt437549.pdf.txttext/plain326897http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/3715/2/437549.pdf.txt5fe3d707f2fbcb39269c58f0c289391eMD52ORIGINAL437549.pdfapplication/pdf1881346http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/3715/1/437549.pdf4e20087da368cfbfbaeb605215a1a748MD51tede/37152015-04-17 15:54:59.07oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/3715Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2015-04-17T18:54:59Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
title Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
spellingShingle Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
Zacharias, Jamile
EDUCAÇÃO
BEM-ESTAR PESSOAL
PROFESSORES - ATUAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL
SATISFAÇÃO NO TRABALHO
AFETIVIDADE
RESILIÊNCIA (TRAÇO DE PERSONALIDADE)
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
title_short Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
title_full Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
title_fullStr Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
title_full_unstemmed Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
title_sort Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre
author Zacharias, Jamile
author_facet Zacharias, Jamile
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Stobäus, Claus Dieter
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:29347181072
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4793566H1
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF:71599240106
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4252666T4
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zacharias, Jamile
contributor_str_mv Stobäus, Claus Dieter
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv EDUCAÇÃO
BEM-ESTAR PESSOAL
PROFESSORES - ATUAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL
SATISFAÇÃO NO TRABALHO
AFETIVIDADE
RESILIÊNCIA (TRAÇO DE PERSONALIDADE)
topic EDUCAÇÃO
BEM-ESTAR PESSOAL
PROFESSORES - ATUAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL
SATISFAÇÃO NO TRABALHO
AFETIVIDADE
RESILIÊNCIA (TRAÇO DE PERSONALIDADE)
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
description This dissertation, approved by PUCRS Research Ethics Committee (CEP), under the registration CEP 11/05397 aims to analyze Porto Alegre (RS) public teachers self-image/self-esteem, self-realization and well-being/ill-being levels and identify and analyze the well-being indicators shown by those teachers, as well as to propose elements that can help to decrease the ill-being and promote the teacher well-being. Consequently, it was used a quanti-qualitative methodological approach by applying questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Regarding the quantitative research, three questionnaires were used: the Self-Image and Self-Esteem Questionnaire (STOBÄUS, 1983), the Self-Realization Questionnaire Based on the Abraham Maslow Theory and the Instrument for Assessment of Variables that are Indicators of Teacher Well-being and Ill-being (JESUS, 1998). About the qualitative research, a semi-structured interview was used (STOBÄUS; MOSQUERA; 2009) to add to the quantitative research and it was based on the Content Analysis proposed by Bardin (2010). The theoretical reference is basically grounded in the studies of Esteve (1994; 1999), Jesus (1996; 1998; 2001a; 2001b; 2002; 2004; 2007), Maslow (1991), Mosquera (1978; 1987), Mosquera and Stobäus (1996; 2006; 2008) and Stobäus (1983). On this research, it was possible to verify that, concerning the self-image/self-esteem levels, teachers interviewed in A School and C School present more positive levels whereas teachers interviewed in B School present an equivalence between the higher levels (positive) and the lower ones (negative); on the whole, the teachers interviewed present more positive levels than negative levels. About the self-realization levels, teachers interviewed in A School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and self-realization needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs; teachers interviewed in B School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and security needs and higher satisfaction levels on relationship and respect needs; teachers interviewed on C School present lower satisfaction levels on physical and security needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs; on the whole, teachers interviewed present lower satisfaction levels on physical and self-realization needs and higher satisfaction levels on respect and relationship needs. Concerning the teacher well-being/ill-being levels, those interviewed in A School present and equivalence between the ill-being and well-being levels, whereas those interviewed in B School and C School present more ill-being levels than well-being levels; on the whole, teachers interviewed also present higher ill-being levels. After analyzing the data obtained by the Teacher Well-Being/Ill-Being Instrument, a Psycho-pedagogical Workshop was done aiming to minimize the ill-being. Also, it was possible to identify and to analyze some teacher well-being indicators, which were separated into the following categories: Professional realization/Pleasure, Social contribution/Graduation, Recognition/Appreciation, Internal relationships and interrelationships/Affectivity and Qualification. On this research, it was verified that, in order to prevent and minimize the ill-being and to promote the teacher well-being, some intervention measures should be carried out by some sections responsible for the education, such as the State, the family and the pedagogical management. Besides, the own educator may and must invest in elements that can contribute to his own satisfaction and personal and professional realization as self-concept, self-image, self-esteem, self-realization, well-being, affectivity, coping and resilience.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-03-28
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-01-10
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-04-14T14:23:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ZACHARIAS, Jamile. Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre. 2012. 153 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/3715
identifier_str_mv ZACHARIAS, Jamile. Bem-estar docente: um estudo em escolas públicas de Porto Alegre. 2012. 153 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/3715
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -8451285793228477937
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 7024413195758546274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Educaç
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/3715/3/437549.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/3715/2/437549.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/3715/1/437549.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e2ee8c00bd9aef27e21c51a4ce12fd2c
5fe3d707f2fbcb39269c58f0c289391e
4e20087da368cfbfbaeb605215a1a748
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1799765295191031808