Antropotécnica criminal : a arte de punir e o homem operável

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, David Leal da
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
• Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8886
• topic: Antropotécnica Criminal; Antropologia Criminal; Criminologia; Biopolítica; Violência; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

In the resarche line on Violence, Crime and Public Security research line of the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul’s Graduation Program in Criminal Sciences, this thesis analyzes the concept of anthropotechnie with the objective of constructing the idea of criminal antropotécnica. Since the last decade of the twentieth century, the concept of anthropothcnic was used, by some theorists, to reorient the occidental thinking about the human being and the violence. Such concept has gone unnoticed by research in the criminal sciences. Its history, even though ignored, reveals an original intimacy that renders impracticable its interpretative recovery. anthropothecnic was attached in the discussion of criminal anthropology and criminological positivism as a biopolitical technique of man's rule over himself and his peers in the transition period of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, when one seeks to demarcate the space of a social control - a criminology -, which came to be arguable also in the brazilian scenario. Since than, new horizons have led to the concept of reformulating and since the last time the anthropotechinic has expanded its reach on problems that touch the human improvement, finding a fertile ground in the current discussions on transhumanism, human enhancement, cyberworld, use of drugs to expand cognitive functions, convergence technologies and psychopathologies related to anthropotechinic. Several authors contributed to the refinement of the anthropotechinic logics from their first formulations. It is important to highlight that Peter Sloterdijk has been one of the most outstanding thinkers in the use of the conceptual development of anthropotechnology, but at the end of the century. XIX, Leonce de Manouvrier has already launched his first bets on this theoretical reason. This assumption presupposes a human change as a fundamental characteristic, an idea that can’t go unnoticed in the history of criminological ideas. All these points allow us to question the possibility of create the concept of criminal anthropotechnic. Anthropotechinic is part of the scope of biopolitics, giving greater relevance to the anthropological aspect by highlighting the human susceptibility to factors of influence in its production. In this sense, since the racism of the century XIX - that transformed the prejudices into the motor of scientific definitions with unfolding, allowed the adoption of eugenics policies, specifically in matters of crime and heredity - up until to the complex theme to terrorism in its most diversified operations, the scope of analysis of these speeches becomes a mandatory stop for criminological political thought, which is a question about the technique of new perspectives for new reflections. Therefore the necessity of presenting the thesis of criminal antropotecnic from rescuing it from the anthropotechnie.