A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10617 |
Resumo: | The present research investigates the Public Defender's Office intervention in Brazilian civil procedure as custos vulnerabilis. It analyzes to what extent the legitimacy of the Public Defender's Office to autonomously intervene as a “guardian” of the vulnerable could contribute to transforming civil litigation into a more dialogic and inclusive environment. As a research hypothesis, it is accepted that custos vulnerabilis intervention is based on the Constitution of the Republic, which gives the Public Defender's Office the role of human rights promoter. The research has social relevance, since Brazil populations is markedly poor and socially unequal, so that the collective interests of historically vulnerable groups are in a state of great litigation, with emphasis on land disputes and recognition of traditional populations, fertile ground to discuss a collective action of the Public Defender's Office on behalf of vulnerable. The general objective of this research is to analyze custos vulnerabilis intervention, exploring its possibilities and limitations as a mechanism of transformation of litigation. The specific objectives are to study the influence exerted by the liberal-individualist paradigm on access to justice idea; to analyze the development of Brazilian legal aid; to examine the constitutionalization of Public Defender's Office; to analyze the origin, characteristics and dogmatic foundations of custos vulnerabilis intervention; to analyze the role of Public Defender's Office in multitudinous possessory actions; to distinguish custos vulnerabilis, custos legis and amicus curiae; to study the institute in the light of the institution structural limitations by proportionality perspective, analyzing it as an instrument for transforming law through a cultural bias. It uses dialectical approach method; monographic and structuralist procedure methods; and sociological interpretation method. It concludes that the Federal Constitution of 1988 represents an important milestone in sense of abandoning the individualistic profile that marked the idea of access to justice and the originally conceived legal aid, a paradigm that also influenced the very genesis of the Public Defender's Office. The custos vulnerabilis intervention itself appears as one among other mechanisms designed with the objective of consolidating a new institutional solidarist bias. Despite the variety of grounds invoked by the literature, it can be said that the role of Public Defender's Office as a "guardian" of vulnerable is related to the idea of "amplification of the hearsay guarantee", thus involving a participatory and democratic dimension. A proportionality analysis in a broad sense suggests a serious reflection about convenience of assigning a new role to Public Defender's Office, in view of the "institutional incompleteness" framework, embodied in the scarce material and human resources that it currently has. On the other hand, by cultural bias, it concludes that the institutionalization of custos vulnerabilis would represent an important procedural metamorphosis capable of contributing to the consolidation of a less individualistic and more inclusive civil litigation. |
id |
P_RS_f46ba5c613738f30cfb6f36875eaeb00 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/10617 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reichelt, Luis Albertohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9764578232283873http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343965624727258Marques, Igor Souza2023-02-09T18:23:38Z2022-11-07https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10617The present research investigates the Public Defender's Office intervention in Brazilian civil procedure as custos vulnerabilis. It analyzes to what extent the legitimacy of the Public Defender's Office to autonomously intervene as a “guardian” of the vulnerable could contribute to transforming civil litigation into a more dialogic and inclusive environment. As a research hypothesis, it is accepted that custos vulnerabilis intervention is based on the Constitution of the Republic, which gives the Public Defender's Office the role of human rights promoter. The research has social relevance, since Brazil populations is markedly poor and socially unequal, so that the collective interests of historically vulnerable groups are in a state of great litigation, with emphasis on land disputes and recognition of traditional populations, fertile ground to discuss a collective action of the Public Defender's Office on behalf of vulnerable. The general objective of this research is to analyze custos vulnerabilis intervention, exploring its possibilities and limitations as a mechanism of transformation of litigation. The specific objectives are to study the influence exerted by the liberal-individualist paradigm on access to justice idea; to analyze the development of Brazilian legal aid; to examine the constitutionalization of Public Defender's Office; to analyze the origin, characteristics and dogmatic foundations of custos vulnerabilis intervention; to analyze the role of Public Defender's Office in multitudinous possessory actions; to distinguish custos vulnerabilis, custos legis and amicus curiae; to study the institute in the light of the institution structural limitations by proportionality perspective, analyzing it as an instrument for transforming law through a cultural bias. It uses dialectical approach method; monographic and structuralist procedure methods; and sociological interpretation method. It concludes that the Federal Constitution of 1988 represents an important milestone in sense of abandoning the individualistic profile that marked the idea of access to justice and the originally conceived legal aid, a paradigm that also influenced the very genesis of the Public Defender's Office. The custos vulnerabilis intervention itself appears as one among other mechanisms designed with the objective of consolidating a new institutional solidarist bias. Despite the variety of grounds invoked by the literature, it can be said that the role of Public Defender's Office as a "guardian" of vulnerable is related to the idea of "amplification of the hearsay guarantee", thus involving a participatory and democratic dimension. A proportionality analysis in a broad sense suggests a serious reflection about convenience of assigning a new role to Public Defender's Office, in view of the "institutional incompleteness" framework, embodied in the scarce material and human resources that it currently has. On the other hand, by cultural bias, it concludes that the institutionalization of custos vulnerabilis would represent an important procedural metamorphosis capable of contributing to the consolidation of a less individualistic and more inclusive civil litigation.A presente pesquisa busca investigar a intervenção da Defensoria Pública no processo civil brasileiro na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis. Analisa-se em que medida a legitimação da Defensoria Pública para intervir autonomamente como “guardiã” dos vulneráveis poderia contribuir para transformar o processo em um ambiente mais dialógico e inclusivo. Como hipótese de pesquisa, compreende-se que a intervenção custos vulnerabilis encontra fundamento na própria Constituição da República, que confere à Defensoria Pública o papel de promotora dos direitos humanos. A pesquisa possui relevância social, uma vez que a população brasileira é marcadamente pobre e socialmente desigual, de modo que os interesses coletivos de grupos historicamente vulneráveis se encontram em estado de grande litigiosidade, com destaque para disputas fundiárias e reconhecimento de populações tradicionais, terreno fértil para discutir-se uma atuação coletiva da Defensoria Pública em prol dos vulneráveis. Constitui objetivo geral desta investigação analisar a intervenção custos vulnerabilis, explorando as suas possibilidades e limitações enquanto mecanismo de transformação do processo. São objetivos específicos: estudar a influência exercida pelo paradigma liberal-individualista sobre a ideia de acesso à justiça; analisar o desenvolvimento da assistência judiciária brasileira; examinar a constitucionalização da Defensoria Pública; analisar a origem, características e fundamentos dogmáticos da intervenção custos vulnerabilis; analisar a atuação da Defensoria Pública nas ações possessórias multitudinárias; distinguir custos vulnerabilis, custos legis e amicus curiae; estudar o instituto à luz das limitações estruturais da instituição a partir do critério da proporcionalidade, analisando-o como instrumento de transformação do direito pelo viés cultural. Utiliza-se o método de abordagem dialético; os métodos de procedimento monográfico e estruturalista; e o método de interpretação sociológico. Conclui-se que a Constituição Federal de 1988 representa um importante marco no sentido de abandonar o perfil individualista que marcava a ideia de acesso à justiça e os serviços de assistência judiciária originalmente concebidos, paradigma que também influenciou a própria gênese da Defensoria Púbica. A própria intervenção custos vulnerabilis surge como um dentre outros mecanismos pensados com o objetivo de consolidar um novo viés institucional solidarista. Sem embargo da variedade de fundamentos invocados pela literatura, pode-se afirmar que o papel da Defensoria Pública enquanto “guardiã” dos vulneráveis relaciona-se à ideia de “amplificação do contraditório”, envolvendo, assim, uma dimensão participativa e democrática. Uma análise fulcrada na proporcionalidade em sentido amplo sugere uma séria reflexão acerca da conveniência de atribuir-se uma nova função à Defensoria Pública, tendo em vista o quadro de “incompletude institucional” do órgão, consubstanciado nos escassos recursos materiais e humanos de que dispõe atualmente. Por outro lado, a partir do viés vultural, conclui que a institucionalização da intervenção custos vulnerabilis representaria importante metamorfose procedimental capaz de contribuir para a consolidação de um processo civil menos individualista e mais inclusivo.Submitted by PPG Direito (ppgdir@pucrs.br) on 2023-02-07T19:53:27Z No. of bitstreams: 1 IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_DIS.pdf: 1379005 bytes, checksum: 66f16649585e6d3add9de574d9e28d4b (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2023-02-09T17:36:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_DIS.pdf: 1379005 bytes, checksum: 66f16649585e6d3add9de574d9e28d4b (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-02-09T18:23:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_DIS.pdf: 1379005 bytes, checksum: 66f16649585e6d3add9de574d9e28d4b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-11-07application/pdfhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/retrieve/186442/DIS_IGOR_%20SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpghttps://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/retrieve/189839/DIS_IGOR_%20SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoPUCRSBrasilEscola de DireitoDefensoria PúblicaCustos VulnerabilisIntervenção ProcessualAcesso à JustiçaContraditórioCustos VulnerabilisProcedural InterventionAccess to JusticeHearsay GuaranteeCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho será publicado como artigo ou livro12 meses09/02/2024-81189034825801997565005005004512033976268881925-7277407233034425144info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSORIGINALDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf1379005https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/5/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf66f16649585e6d3add9de574d9e28d4bMD55THUMBNAILDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4132https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/4/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg8e90f0dcb1a79ec1d44b6c0591722044MD54DIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5583https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/7/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpga4e866e496e0ac71abe2df054e285055MD57TEXTDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain1943https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/3/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt5ca225dcda0e8c371b47942b95b7d798MD53DIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_IGOR_ SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain345075https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/6/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.txt642f4a135cf11b7aa1758c1eb96bf85eMD56LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/106172024-02-09 20:00:18.367oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2024-02-09T22:00:18Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
title |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
spellingShingle |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito Marques, Igor Souza Defensoria Pública Custos Vulnerabilis Intervenção Processual Acesso à Justiça Contraditório Custos Vulnerabilis Procedural Intervention Access to Justice Hearsay Guarantee CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
title_full |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
title_fullStr |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
title_full_unstemmed |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
title_sort |
A intervenção processual da Defensoria Pública na qualidade de custos vulnerabilis : perspectivas e limitações para transformação do Direito |
author |
Marques, Igor Souza |
author_facet |
Marques, Igor Souza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Reichelt, Luis Alberto |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9764578232283873 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343965624727258 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Igor Souza |
contributor_str_mv |
Reichelt, Luis Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Defensoria Pública Custos Vulnerabilis Intervenção Processual Acesso à Justiça Contraditório |
topic |
Defensoria Pública Custos Vulnerabilis Intervenção Processual Acesso à Justiça Contraditório Custos Vulnerabilis Procedural Intervention Access to Justice Hearsay Guarantee CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Custos Vulnerabilis Procedural Intervention Access to Justice Hearsay Guarantee |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The present research investigates the Public Defender's Office intervention in Brazilian civil procedure as custos vulnerabilis. It analyzes to what extent the legitimacy of the Public Defender's Office to autonomously intervene as a “guardian” of the vulnerable could contribute to transforming civil litigation into a more dialogic and inclusive environment. As a research hypothesis, it is accepted that custos vulnerabilis intervention is based on the Constitution of the Republic, which gives the Public Defender's Office the role of human rights promoter. The research has social relevance, since Brazil populations is markedly poor and socially unequal, so that the collective interests of historically vulnerable groups are in a state of great litigation, with emphasis on land disputes and recognition of traditional populations, fertile ground to discuss a collective action of the Public Defender's Office on behalf of vulnerable. The general objective of this research is to analyze custos vulnerabilis intervention, exploring its possibilities and limitations as a mechanism of transformation of litigation. The specific objectives are to study the influence exerted by the liberal-individualist paradigm on access to justice idea; to analyze the development of Brazilian legal aid; to examine the constitutionalization of Public Defender's Office; to analyze the origin, characteristics and dogmatic foundations of custos vulnerabilis intervention; to analyze the role of Public Defender's Office in multitudinous possessory actions; to distinguish custos vulnerabilis, custos legis and amicus curiae; to study the institute in the light of the institution structural limitations by proportionality perspective, analyzing it as an instrument for transforming law through a cultural bias. It uses dialectical approach method; monographic and structuralist procedure methods; and sociological interpretation method. It concludes that the Federal Constitution of 1988 represents an important milestone in sense of abandoning the individualistic profile that marked the idea of access to justice and the originally conceived legal aid, a paradigm that also influenced the very genesis of the Public Defender's Office. The custos vulnerabilis intervention itself appears as one among other mechanisms designed with the objective of consolidating a new institutional solidarist bias. Despite the variety of grounds invoked by the literature, it can be said that the role of Public Defender's Office as a "guardian" of vulnerable is related to the idea of "amplification of the hearsay guarantee", thus involving a participatory and democratic dimension. A proportionality analysis in a broad sense suggests a serious reflection about convenience of assigning a new role to Public Defender's Office, in view of the "institutional incompleteness" framework, embodied in the scarce material and human resources that it currently has. On the other hand, by cultural bias, it concludes that the institutionalization of custos vulnerabilis would represent an important procedural metamorphosis capable of contributing to the consolidation of a less individualistic and more inclusive civil litigation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-07 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-09T18:23:38Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10617 |
url |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10617 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8118903482580199756 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
4512033976268881925 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-7277407233034425144 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/5/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/4/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/7/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/3/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/6/DIS_IGOR_+SOUZA_MARQUES_COMPLETO.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10617/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
66f16649585e6d3add9de574d9e28d4b 8e90f0dcb1a79ec1d44b6c0591722044 a4e866e496e0ac71abe2df054e285055 5ca225dcda0e8c371b47942b95b7d798 642f4a135cf11b7aa1758c1eb96bf85e 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1799765359606104064 |