Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10973 |
Resumo: | This work explores the relationship between technology and justice, with a specific focus on the debate surrounding the use of algorithms in judicial proceedings as a replacement for human judges. It begins by establishing a definition of justice as a means of resolving conflicts and promoting harmonious coexistence in society. The discussion delves into the perspectives of essentialism and functionalism regarding the substitution of human tasks by machines. Essentialist arguments center on the absence of essential human properties that make it impossible for machines to replicate the outcomes of human work, while functionalists see no impediments to such substitution. The dissertation then examines the argument that the lack of creativity in artificial intelligence poses a limitation to its application in non-mechanical tasks. Essentialists associate creativity with consciousness, suggesting a biological component is necessary for machines to be considered creative, while functionalists focus on the outcome of activities, allowing for the attribution of creativity to machines. Furthermore, the paper delves into the implications of delegating judgments to machines, drawing upon the concept of legal realism. The concerns raised against machine substitution appear to be more related to a fear of losing control over technology rather than rejecting its benefits. The implementation of technology has already demonstrated efficiency in the resolution of conflicts, aligned with previous judgments. In light of these discussions, the work concludes that adopting na intermediate position, rather than embracing extreme rejection or uncritical adoption of technology, seems more appropriate. This approach acknowledges both technological advancements and a critical perspective on potential problems. It emphasizes the need to strike a balance, ensuring that justice is effectively achieved and fosters harmony in society. Ultimately, the amount of AI utilization in the judicial system remains a decision for humans to evaluate and supervise. Trade-offs between efficiency and satisfaction with the chosen conflict resolution system must be carefully considered. Incorporating AI into the judicial process requires an informed and ethical approach, considering the fundamental principles of justice and societal aspirations. By doing so, a well-balanced integration of technology and preservation of essential legal values can be achieved, contributing to the establishment of a just and harmonious society. This abstract was generated by an artificial intelligence after being provided with the entirety of the text. |
id |
P_RS_f48f00ea4a7b50ebb7ca7d58b67b3aea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/10973 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Weber, Thadeuhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347http://lattes.cnpq.br/3363890842888822Camargo, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de2023-08-29T19:53:12Z2023-08-07https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10973This work explores the relationship between technology and justice, with a specific focus on the debate surrounding the use of algorithms in judicial proceedings as a replacement for human judges. It begins by establishing a definition of justice as a means of resolving conflicts and promoting harmonious coexistence in society. The discussion delves into the perspectives of essentialism and functionalism regarding the substitution of human tasks by machines. Essentialist arguments center on the absence of essential human properties that make it impossible for machines to replicate the outcomes of human work, while functionalists see no impediments to such substitution. The dissertation then examines the argument that the lack of creativity in artificial intelligence poses a limitation to its application in non-mechanical tasks. Essentialists associate creativity with consciousness, suggesting a biological component is necessary for machines to be considered creative, while functionalists focus on the outcome of activities, allowing for the attribution of creativity to machines. Furthermore, the paper delves into the implications of delegating judgments to machines, drawing upon the concept of legal realism. The concerns raised against machine substitution appear to be more related to a fear of losing control over technology rather than rejecting its benefits. The implementation of technology has already demonstrated efficiency in the resolution of conflicts, aligned with previous judgments. In light of these discussions, the work concludes that adopting na intermediate position, rather than embracing extreme rejection or uncritical adoption of technology, seems more appropriate. This approach acknowledges both technological advancements and a critical perspective on potential problems. It emphasizes the need to strike a balance, ensuring that justice is effectively achieved and fosters harmony in society. Ultimately, the amount of AI utilization in the judicial system remains a decision for humans to evaluate and supervise. Trade-offs between efficiency and satisfaction with the chosen conflict resolution system must be carefully considered. Incorporating AI into the judicial process requires an informed and ethical approach, considering the fundamental principles of justice and societal aspirations. By doing so, a well-balanced integration of technology and preservation of essential legal values can be achieved, contributing to the establishment of a just and harmonious society. This abstract was generated by an artificial intelligence after being provided with the entirety of the text.Este trabalho explora a relação entre tecnologia e justiça, com um foco específico no debate em torno do uso de algoritmos em processos judiciais como substituição de juízes humanos. Ele começa estabelecendo uma definição de justiça como um meio de resolver conflitos e promover uma convivência harmoniosa na sociedade. A discussão adentra nas perspectivas do essencialismo e funcionalismo em relação à substituição de tarefas humanas por máquinas. Os argumentos essencialistas se concentram na ausência de propriedades humanas essenciais que tornam impossível para as máquinas replicarem os resultados do trabalho humano, enquanto os funcionalistas não veem impedimentos para essa substituição. O trabalho então examina o argumento de que a falta de criatividade na inteligência artificial representa uma limitação para sua aplicação em tarefas não mecânicas. Os essencialistas tendem a associar a criatividade à consciência, sugerindo que um componente biológico é necessário para que as máquinas sejam consideradas criativas, enquanto os funcionalistas se concentram no resultado das atividades, permitindo a atribuição de criatividade às máquinas. Em seguida, o trabalho adentra nas implicações da delegação de julgamentos às máquinas, baseando-se no conceito de realismo jurídico. As preocupações levantadas contra a substituição por máquinas parecem estar mais relacionadas ao medo de perder o controle sobre a tecnologia do que em rejeitar seus benefícios. A implementação da tecnologia já demonstrou eficiência na resolução de conflitos, em conformidade com decisões anteriores. Diante dessas discussões, o trabalho conclui que adotar uma posição intermediária, em vez de abraçar a rejeição extrema ou a adoção acrítica da tecnologia, parece ser mais apropriado. Essa abordagem reconhece tanto os avanços tecnológicos quanto uma perspectiva crítica sobre os problemas potenciais. Enfatiza a necessidade de encontrar um equilíbrio, garantindo que a justiça seja efetivamente alcançada e promovendo a harmonia na sociedade. Em última análise, a quantidade de utilização da inteligência artificial no sistema judicial é uma decisão humana que deve ser avaliada e supervisionada por eles. É fundamental ponderar os trade-offs entre eficiência e satisfação com o sistema escolhido de resolução de conflitos. Incorporar a inteligência artificial no processo judicial requer uma abordagem informada e ética, considerando os princípios fundamentais da justiça e as aspirações da sociedade em relação à resolução de conflitos. Dessa forma, seria possível alcançar uma integração equilibrada da tecnologia e preservação dos valores legais essenciais para a construção de uma sociedade justa e harmoniosa. Este resumo foi gerado por uma inteligência artificial após receber o texto completo da dissertação.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2023-08-18T19:15:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf: 1345084 bytes, checksum: 6b189d6e70e6498f348ffb31e75e5a3e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sarajane Pan (sarajane.pan@pucrs.br) on 2023-08-29T18:48:48Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf: 1345084 bytes, checksum: 6b189d6e70e6498f348ffb31e75e5a3e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-29T19:53:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf: 1345084 bytes, checksum: 6b189d6e70e6498f348ffb31e75e5a3e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2023-08-07application/pdfhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/retrieve/188838/Dissertacao%20-%20Guilherme%20Camargo%20-%20versao%20final.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesDireitoTecnologiaJustiçaAlgoritmosSistema JudicialIA (Inteligência Artificial)LawTechnologyJusticeAlgorithmsJudicial SystemAI (Artificial Intelligence)CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAJustiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho não apresenta restrição para publicação-1441514414422910841500500500-6557531471218110192-672352020940167053info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf.jpgDissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5949https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/4/Dissertacao+-+Guilherme+Camargo+-+versao+final.pdf.jpge6a8ee689dfdc940f8a7aebaa6636de0MD54TEXTDissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf.txtDissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdf.txttext/plain224911https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/3/Dissertacao+-+Guilherme+Camargo+-+versao+final.pdf.txt2e309d5082e26a738ce943e80fee72a0MD53ORIGINALDissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdfDissertacao - Guilherme Camargo - versao final.pdfapplication/pdf1345084https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/2/Dissertacao+-+Guilherme+Camargo+-+versao+final.pdf6b189d6e70e6498f348ffb31e75e5a3eMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/109732023-08-29 20:00:19.761oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2023-08-29T23:00:19Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
title |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
spellingShingle |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos Camargo, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de Direito Tecnologia Justiça Algoritmos Sistema Judicial IA (Inteligência Artificial) Law Technology Justice Algorithms Judicial System AI (Artificial Intelligence) CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
title_full |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
title_fullStr |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
title_sort |
Justiça e inteligência artificial : algoritmos e resolução de conflitos |
author |
Camargo, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de |
author_facet |
Camargo, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3363890842888822 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camargo, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de |
contributor_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Tecnologia Justiça Algoritmos Sistema Judicial IA (Inteligência Artificial) |
topic |
Direito Tecnologia Justiça Algoritmos Sistema Judicial IA (Inteligência Artificial) Law Technology Justice Algorithms Judicial System AI (Artificial Intelligence) CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Law Technology Justice Algorithms Judicial System AI (Artificial Intelligence) |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This work explores the relationship between technology and justice, with a specific focus on the debate surrounding the use of algorithms in judicial proceedings as a replacement for human judges. It begins by establishing a definition of justice as a means of resolving conflicts and promoting harmonious coexistence in society. The discussion delves into the perspectives of essentialism and functionalism regarding the substitution of human tasks by machines. Essentialist arguments center on the absence of essential human properties that make it impossible for machines to replicate the outcomes of human work, while functionalists see no impediments to such substitution. The dissertation then examines the argument that the lack of creativity in artificial intelligence poses a limitation to its application in non-mechanical tasks. Essentialists associate creativity with consciousness, suggesting a biological component is necessary for machines to be considered creative, while functionalists focus on the outcome of activities, allowing for the attribution of creativity to machines. Furthermore, the paper delves into the implications of delegating judgments to machines, drawing upon the concept of legal realism. The concerns raised against machine substitution appear to be more related to a fear of losing control over technology rather than rejecting its benefits. The implementation of technology has already demonstrated efficiency in the resolution of conflicts, aligned with previous judgments. In light of these discussions, the work concludes that adopting na intermediate position, rather than embracing extreme rejection or uncritical adoption of technology, seems more appropriate. This approach acknowledges both technological advancements and a critical perspective on potential problems. It emphasizes the need to strike a balance, ensuring that justice is effectively achieved and fosters harmony in society. Ultimately, the amount of AI utilization in the judicial system remains a decision for humans to evaluate and supervise. Trade-offs between efficiency and satisfaction with the chosen conflict resolution system must be carefully considered. Incorporating AI into the judicial process requires an informed and ethical approach, considering the fundamental principles of justice and societal aspirations. By doing so, a well-balanced integration of technology and preservation of essential legal values can be achieved, contributing to the establishment of a just and harmonious society. This abstract was generated by an artificial intelligence after being provided with the entirety of the text. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-29T19:53:12Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-07 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10973 |
url |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/10973 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1441514414422910841 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/4/Dissertacao+-+Guilherme+Camargo+-+versao+final.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/3/Dissertacao+-+Guilherme+Camargo+-+versao+final.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/2/Dissertacao+-+Guilherme+Camargo+-+versao+final.pdf https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/10973/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e6a8ee689dfdc940f8a7aebaa6636de0 2e309d5082e26a738ce943e80fee72a0 6b189d6e70e6498f348ffb31e75e5a3e 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1799765362780143616 |