How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tamigneaux, François
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/30147
Resumo: The growing importance of social enterprises further raises the question of how to monitor effectively the performance of these organisations pursuing multiple goals. Yet, both academic and practitioners communities have to conciliate their understanding of performance to design adequate tools matching strong theoretical foundation to practical realities. This paper aims at outlining what performance is to academics and practitioners as well as scrutinizing the influence of governance on performance perception. Results obtained from a field-based study conducted with three Belgian social enterprises are compared to the theoretical perspective of academics extracted from an in-depth review of the existing literature. The findings suggest that practitioners rather comprehend performance as their economic results sustaining their social activities rather than a balanced mix of various dimensions so academics do. It is further highlighted that the age, the size and the composition of the board influences performance understanding and objective concerns.
id RCAP_021116dfb92b448f0161e6e3aa2f8c57
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/30147
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative studySocial enterprisePerformancePerformance measurementGovernanceDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThe growing importance of social enterprises further raises the question of how to monitor effectively the performance of these organisations pursuing multiple goals. Yet, both academic and practitioners communities have to conciliate their understanding of performance to design adequate tools matching strong theoretical foundation to practical realities. This paper aims at outlining what performance is to academics and practitioners as well as scrutinizing the influence of governance on performance perception. Results obtained from a field-based study conducted with three Belgian social enterprises are compared to the theoretical perspective of academics extracted from an in-depth review of the existing literature. The findings suggest that practitioners rather comprehend performance as their economic results sustaining their social activities rather than a balanced mix of various dimensions so academics do. It is further highlighted that the age, the size and the composition of the board influences performance understanding and objective concerns.Janssen, FrankMartins, Miguel AlvesRUNTamigneaux, François2022-09-30T00:30:36Z2015-09-282015-09-28T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/30147TID:201473810enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:16:38Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/30147Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:29:25.205172Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
title How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
spellingShingle How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
Tamigneaux, François
Social enterprise
Performance
Performance measurement
Governance
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
title_full How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
title_fullStr How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
title_sort How practitioners and academics perceive performance of social enterprise? A qualitative study
author Tamigneaux, François
author_facet Tamigneaux, François
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Janssen, Frank
Martins, Miguel Alves
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tamigneaux, François
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social enterprise
Performance
Performance measurement
Governance
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Social enterprise
Performance
Performance measurement
Governance
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description The growing importance of social enterprises further raises the question of how to monitor effectively the performance of these organisations pursuing multiple goals. Yet, both academic and practitioners communities have to conciliate their understanding of performance to design adequate tools matching strong theoretical foundation to practical realities. This paper aims at outlining what performance is to academics and practitioners as well as scrutinizing the influence of governance on performance perception. Results obtained from a field-based study conducted with three Belgian social enterprises are compared to the theoretical perspective of academics extracted from an in-depth review of the existing literature. The findings suggest that practitioners rather comprehend performance as their economic results sustaining their social activities rather than a balanced mix of various dimensions so academics do. It is further highlighted that the age, the size and the composition of the board influences performance understanding and objective concerns.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-28
2015-09-28T00:00:00Z
2022-09-30T00:30:36Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/30147
TID:201473810
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/30147
identifier_str_mv TID:201473810
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137920028770304