Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925 |
Resumo: | What are the leading obstacles to reaching a consensus on international norms that regulate state-sponsored cyber-offences? This type of operation increases swiftly, whilst issues related to international law go unnoticed, are poorly understood, or are manipulated, clouding the debate on norms of international conduct in cyberspace. This article analyses the main obstacles to regulating such cyber-offences. It argues that the main difficulties concern statecraft and state power promotion, not novelty or innovation speed, ideological or technological issues, as usually claimed. The analysis encompasses the applicability of thecurrent rules of armed conflicts to the cyberspace context, the perspectives and positions regarding multilateral conventions, the option for bilateral or regional agreements and the normalisation of some cyber-activities as means of influencing consuetudinary law. It is shown that some nations advocate for maintaining the status quo that favours them, whilst othersinsist on the need for specific regulations. |
id |
RCAP_04af11d5a7de778caaf3f62bed7a8cbf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/29925 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensusNormas internacionaisComportamento cibernéticoComportamento cibernético; Conflitos interestataisWhat are the leading obstacles to reaching a consensus on international norms that regulate state-sponsored cyber-offences? This type of operation increases swiftly, whilst issues related to international law go unnoticed, are poorly understood, or are manipulated, clouding the debate on norms of international conduct in cyberspace. This article analyses the main obstacles to regulating such cyber-offences. It argues that the main difficulties concern statecraft and state power promotion, not novelty or innovation speed, ideological or technological issues, as usually claimed. The analysis encompasses the applicability of thecurrent rules of armed conflicts to the cyberspace context, the perspectives and positions regarding multilateral conventions, the option for bilateral or regional agreements and the normalisation of some cyber-activities as means of influencing consuetudinary law. It is shown that some nations advocate for maintaining the status quo that favours them, whilst othersinsist on the need for specific regulations.Instituto da Defesa Nacional2023-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925Nação e Defesa; N.º 163 (2022): Tecnologia, Cibernética e Defesa2183-96620870-757Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925https://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925/21479Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Nação e Defesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMalagutti, Marcelo2023-04-29T09:10:12Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/29925Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:42:39.977964Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
title |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
spellingShingle |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus Malagutti, Marcelo Normas internacionais Comportamento cibernético Comportamento cibernético; Conflitos interestatais |
title_short |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
title_full |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
title_fullStr |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
title_sort |
Regulating States Cyber-Behaviour: obstacles for a consensus |
author |
Malagutti, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Malagutti, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Malagutti, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Normas internacionais Comportamento cibernético Comportamento cibernético; Conflitos interestatais |
topic |
Normas internacionais Comportamento cibernético Comportamento cibernético; Conflitos interestatais |
description |
What are the leading obstacles to reaching a consensus on international norms that regulate state-sponsored cyber-offences? This type of operation increases swiftly, whilst issues related to international law go unnoticed, are poorly understood, or are manipulated, clouding the debate on norms of international conduct in cyberspace. This article analyses the main obstacles to regulating such cyber-offences. It argues that the main difficulties concern statecraft and state power promotion, not novelty or innovation speed, ideological or technological issues, as usually claimed. The analysis encompasses the applicability of thecurrent rules of armed conflicts to the cyberspace context, the perspectives and positions regarding multilateral conventions, the option for bilateral or regional agreements and the normalisation of some cyber-activities as means of influencing consuetudinary law. It is shown that some nations advocate for maintaining the status quo that favours them, whilst othersinsist on the need for specific regulations. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925 |
url |
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925 https://revistas.rcaap.pt/index.php/nacao/article/view/29925/21479 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Nação e Defesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Nação e Defesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto da Defesa Nacional |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto da Defesa Nacional |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Nação e Defesa; N.º 163 (2022): Tecnologia, Cibernética e Defesa 2183-9662 0870-757X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131513011306496 |