Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Henriques, Paulo Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Curado, Carla, Oliveira, Mirian, Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887
Resumo: The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the infuence of diferent conditions on academic publishing. Results show that (1) hard sciences academics publish more than soft sciences; (2) there are resemblances in academic publishing; (3) there are diferences in the sufcient conditions sets for the two groups of sciences which may be explained by diferences in scientifc conceptual frameworks and research methods applied in each group of disciplines; (4) conditions leading to the absence of publishing reveal similarities and diferences among hard and soft sciences academics. The study contribute to: (1) the debate on the questionable generalization of scientifc publications indexes and rankings due to the nature of research published coming from diferent scientifc universes; (2) identify pathways for achieving higher performance in academic publishing; (3) allow research centers’ managers to better manage the centers aiming to achieve upper output levels
id RCAP_05621ac486458f93aa9bf8699f25a46b
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/24887
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectationsResearch AntecedentsAcademic Publishing ProductivityHard SciencesSoft SciencesQualitative Comparative AnalysisThe study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the infuence of diferent conditions on academic publishing. Results show that (1) hard sciences academics publish more than soft sciences; (2) there are resemblances in academic publishing; (3) there are diferences in the sufcient conditions sets for the two groups of sciences which may be explained by diferences in scientifc conceptual frameworks and research methods applied in each group of disciplines; (4) conditions leading to the absence of publishing reveal similarities and diferences among hard and soft sciences academics. The study contribute to: (1) the debate on the questionable generalization of scientifc publications indexes and rankings due to the nature of research published coming from diferent scientifc universes; (2) identify pathways for achieving higher performance in academic publishing; (3) allow research centers’ managers to better manage the centers aiming to achieve upper output levelsSpringer NatureRepositório da Universidade de LisboaHenriques, Paulo LopesCurado, CarlaOliveira, MirianMaçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud2022-07-15T20:08:16Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887engHenriques, Paulo Lopes … [et al.]. (2019). “Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations." Quality & Quantity, Vol. 53 No 3 : pp.1301-1324.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:54:32Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/24887Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:08:49.969420Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
title Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
spellingShingle Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
Henriques, Paulo Lopes
Research Antecedents
Academic Publishing Productivity
Hard Sciences
Soft Sciences
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
title_short Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
title_full Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
title_fullStr Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
title_full_unstemmed Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
title_sort Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
author Henriques, Paulo Lopes
author_facet Henriques, Paulo Lopes
Curado, Carla
Oliveira, Mirian
Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud
author_role author
author2 Curado, Carla
Oliveira, Mirian
Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Henriques, Paulo Lopes
Curado, Carla
Oliveira, Mirian
Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Research Antecedents
Academic Publishing Productivity
Hard Sciences
Soft Sciences
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
topic Research Antecedents
Academic Publishing Productivity
Hard Sciences
Soft Sciences
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
description The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the infuence of diferent conditions on academic publishing. Results show that (1) hard sciences academics publish more than soft sciences; (2) there are resemblances in academic publishing; (3) there are diferences in the sufcient conditions sets for the two groups of sciences which may be explained by diferences in scientifc conceptual frameworks and research methods applied in each group of disciplines; (4) conditions leading to the absence of publishing reveal similarities and diferences among hard and soft sciences academics. The study contribute to: (1) the debate on the questionable generalization of scientifc publications indexes and rankings due to the nature of research published coming from diferent scientifc universes; (2) identify pathways for achieving higher performance in academic publishing; (3) allow research centers’ managers to better manage the centers aiming to achieve upper output levels
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-07-15T20:08:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Henriques, Paulo Lopes … [et al.]. (2019). “Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations." Quality & Quantity, Vol. 53 No 3 : pp.1301-1324.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131183016050689

Registros relacionados