Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887 |
Resumo: | The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the infuence of diferent conditions on academic publishing. Results show that (1) hard sciences academics publish more than soft sciences; (2) there are resemblances in academic publishing; (3) there are diferences in the sufcient conditions sets for the two groups of sciences which may be explained by diferences in scientifc conceptual frameworks and research methods applied in each group of disciplines; (4) conditions leading to the absence of publishing reveal similarities and diferences among hard and soft sciences academics. The study contribute to: (1) the debate on the questionable generalization of scientifc publications indexes and rankings due to the nature of research published coming from diferent scientifc universes; (2) identify pathways for achieving higher performance in academic publishing; (3) allow research centers’ managers to better manage the centers aiming to achieve upper output levels |
id |
RCAP_05621ac486458f93aa9bf8699f25a46b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/24887 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectationsResearch AntecedentsAcademic Publishing ProductivityHard SciencesSoft SciencesQualitative Comparative AnalysisThe study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the infuence of diferent conditions on academic publishing. Results show that (1) hard sciences academics publish more than soft sciences; (2) there are resemblances in academic publishing; (3) there are diferences in the sufcient conditions sets for the two groups of sciences which may be explained by diferences in scientifc conceptual frameworks and research methods applied in each group of disciplines; (4) conditions leading to the absence of publishing reveal similarities and diferences among hard and soft sciences academics. The study contribute to: (1) the debate on the questionable generalization of scientifc publications indexes and rankings due to the nature of research published coming from diferent scientifc universes; (2) identify pathways for achieving higher performance in academic publishing; (3) allow research centers’ managers to better manage the centers aiming to achieve upper output levelsSpringer NatureRepositório da Universidade de LisboaHenriques, Paulo LopesCurado, CarlaOliveira, MirianMaçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud2022-07-15T20:08:16Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887engHenriques, Paulo Lopes … [et al.]. (2019). “Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations." Quality & Quantity, Vol. 53 No 3 : pp.1301-1324.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:54:32Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/24887Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:08:49.969420Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
title |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
spellingShingle |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations Henriques, Paulo Lopes Research Antecedents Academic Publishing Productivity Hard Sciences Soft Sciences Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
title_short |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
title_full |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
title_fullStr |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
title_sort |
Publishing? : You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations |
author |
Henriques, Paulo Lopes |
author_facet |
Henriques, Paulo Lopes Curado, Carla Oliveira, Mirian Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Curado, Carla Oliveira, Mirian Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Henriques, Paulo Lopes Curado, Carla Oliveira, Mirian Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Research Antecedents Academic Publishing Productivity Hard Sciences Soft Sciences Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
topic |
Research Antecedents Academic Publishing Productivity Hard Sciences Soft Sciences Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
description |
The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the infuence of diferent conditions on academic publishing. Results show that (1) hard sciences academics publish more than soft sciences; (2) there are resemblances in academic publishing; (3) there are diferences in the sufcient conditions sets for the two groups of sciences which may be explained by diferences in scientifc conceptual frameworks and research methods applied in each group of disciplines; (4) conditions leading to the absence of publishing reveal similarities and diferences among hard and soft sciences academics. The study contribute to: (1) the debate on the questionable generalization of scientifc publications indexes and rankings due to the nature of research published coming from diferent scientifc universes; (2) identify pathways for achieving higher performance in academic publishing; (3) allow research centers’ managers to better manage the centers aiming to achieve upper output levels |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-15T20:08:16Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24887 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Henriques, Paulo Lopes … [et al.]. (2019). “Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations." Quality & Quantity, Vol. 53 No 3 : pp.1301-1324. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131183016050689 |