Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Venâncio, Débora
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/22348
Resumo: The purpose of this Work Paper (WP) is to provide, based on real cases, a critical reflection on the applicability of three stakeholder management models. The three models developed by Mitchell (1997), Tulder (2003) and Preble (2005), while showing some similarities, provide different frameworks to support managers in the process of multi-stakeholder dialogue. The WP ends with recommendations for organizations that intend to use these models in their specific stakeholder management context.
id RCAP_07714dbf381ee2295d6191177a8d4412
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/22348
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Stakeholder management in practice, a critical reviewBusinessStrategyStakeholderDialoguePlanningMethodologyManagerOrganization responsesStakeholder managementDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThe purpose of this Work Paper (WP) is to provide, based on real cases, a critical reflection on the applicability of three stakeholder management models. The three models developed by Mitchell (1997), Tulder (2003) and Preble (2005), while showing some similarities, provide different frameworks to support managers in the process of multi-stakeholder dialogue. The WP ends with recommendations for organizations that intend to use these models in their specific stakeholder management context.Sousa, MiltonRUNVenâncio, Débora2017-08-01T08:48:49Z2017-01-202017-01-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/22348TID:201714213enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:09:47Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/22348Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:27:14.389714Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
title Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
spellingShingle Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
Venâncio, Débora
Business
Strategy
Stakeholder
Dialogue
Planning
Methodology
Manager
Organization responses
Stakeholder management
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
title_full Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
title_fullStr Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
title_sort Stakeholder management in practice, a critical review
author Venâncio, Débora
author_facet Venâncio, Débora
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sousa, Milton
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Venâncio, Débora
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Business
Strategy
Stakeholder
Dialogue
Planning
Methodology
Manager
Organization responses
Stakeholder management
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Business
Strategy
Stakeholder
Dialogue
Planning
Methodology
Manager
Organization responses
Stakeholder management
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description The purpose of this Work Paper (WP) is to provide, based on real cases, a critical reflection on the applicability of three stakeholder management models. The three models developed by Mitchell (1997), Tulder (2003) and Preble (2005), while showing some similarities, provide different frameworks to support managers in the process of multi-stakeholder dialogue. The WP ends with recommendations for organizations that intend to use these models in their specific stakeholder management context.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01T08:48:49Z
2017-01-20
2017-01-20T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/22348
TID:201714213
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/22348
identifier_str_mv TID:201714213
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137901156499456

Registros relacionados