New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fonseca, Daniela Esperança Monteiro da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Fábio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10867
Resumo: New social movements emerge in Portugal as relevant actors in democratic decision-making processes. As more democratic, young and urban, new social move-ments engage in a relevant change in the processes of negotiation (Santos 2008, 2001; Schemmeling 2009; Swyngedouw 2010; Touraine 2002, 1994), publicizing marginal claims and minority flags (Guerra 2006; Henriques 2007; Picolotto 2007; Alonso 2009). So, this article aims to discover: “How to define today’s narratives of the New Social Movements in Portuguese media, in the view of young people?”. The meth-odological resources used are documentary research and inquiry to a nonprobabilistic sample survey by voluntary system.The most significant results found about new activism are: a) journalistic pieces are evaluated, by youth, as partial, superficial and controversial; b) the respondents as-sociate some advantages to the new activism: flexibility, new technologies, and the per-ception of helping the world; c) and, finally, the respondents associate disadvantages to the new activism: extremism, violence, controversy.
id RCAP_07bccf21923bdedc67ba05e44b27dd5e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/10867
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young peopleNew Social MovementsActivismMediaNew social movements emerge in Portugal as relevant actors in democratic decision-making processes. As more democratic, young and urban, new social move-ments engage in a relevant change in the processes of negotiation (Santos 2008, 2001; Schemmeling 2009; Swyngedouw 2010; Touraine 2002, 1994), publicizing marginal claims and minority flags (Guerra 2006; Henriques 2007; Picolotto 2007; Alonso 2009). So, this article aims to discover: “How to define today’s narratives of the New Social Movements in Portuguese media, in the view of young people?”. The meth-odological resources used are documentary research and inquiry to a nonprobabilistic sample survey by voluntary system.The most significant results found about new activism are: a) journalistic pieces are evaluated, by youth, as partial, superficial and controversial; b) the respondents as-sociate some advantages to the new activism: flexibility, new technologies, and the per-ception of helping the world; c) and, finally, the respondents associate disadvantages to the new activism: extremism, violence, controversy.Departamento de Letras, Artes e Comunicação da UTAD2021-12-10T15:27:55Z2021-12-01T00:00:00Z2021-12info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10348/10867engFonseca, Daniela Esperança Monteiro daRibeiro, Fábioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-02T12:56:13Zoai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/10867Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:06:19.209905Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
title New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
spellingShingle New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
Fonseca, Daniela Esperança Monteiro da
New Social Movements
Activism
Media
title_short New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
title_full New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
title_fullStr New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
title_full_unstemmed New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
title_sort New Social Movements in Media: Marginal or Marginalized Narratives? The view of young people
author Fonseca, Daniela Esperança Monteiro da
author_facet Fonseca, Daniela Esperança Monteiro da
Ribeiro, Fábio
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Fábio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fonseca, Daniela Esperança Monteiro da
Ribeiro, Fábio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv New Social Movements
Activism
Media
topic New Social Movements
Activism
Media
description New social movements emerge in Portugal as relevant actors in democratic decision-making processes. As more democratic, young and urban, new social move-ments engage in a relevant change in the processes of negotiation (Santos 2008, 2001; Schemmeling 2009; Swyngedouw 2010; Touraine 2002, 1994), publicizing marginal claims and minority flags (Guerra 2006; Henriques 2007; Picolotto 2007; Alonso 2009). So, this article aims to discover: “How to define today’s narratives of the New Social Movements in Portuguese media, in the view of young people?”. The meth-odological resources used are documentary research and inquiry to a nonprobabilistic sample survey by voluntary system.The most significant results found about new activism are: a) journalistic pieces are evaluated, by youth, as partial, superficial and controversial; b) the respondents as-sociate some advantages to the new activism: flexibility, new technologies, and the per-ception of helping the world; c) and, finally, the respondents associate disadvantages to the new activism: extremism, violence, controversy.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-10T15:27:55Z
2021-12-01T00:00:00Z
2021-12
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10867
url http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10867
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Letras, Artes e Comunicação da UTAD
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Letras, Artes e Comunicação da UTAD
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137151494914048