Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sobral, Sandrina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Passos, Clotilde, Ribeiro, Célia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033
Resumo: Organizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed.
id RCAP_07e6a960446758bd29e2e1dff06285b2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main modelsResponsabilidade social das organizações: uma revisão aos principais modelosOrganizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed.A Responsabilidade Social das Organizações (RSO) é encarada como um dos temas de investigação do século vigente, apresentando-se com uma extensa e diversa evolução concetual, ao incluir novos constructos e dimensões, explicada pela crescente valorização e interesse da sociedade pela temática. Começou a ser estudada desde a segunda metade do século XX e o seu desenvolvimento gerou várias modelos e teorias. Nesse sentido, objetivou-se analisar os modelos de RSO, evidenciando a sua influência nas diferentes fases do conceito, recorrendo a uma metodologia qualitativa. Foram apresentados e analisados criticamente dez modelos, particularmente: teoria e modelo dos stakeholders; modelo piramidal de Carroll (1979); modelo bidimensional de Quazi e O’Brien (2000); modelo dos três domínios de Schwartz e Carroll (2003); modelo de mapeamento do território de Garriga e Melé (2004); modelo de 3C-SR de Meehan, Meehan e Richards (2006); modelo integrativo de Porter e Cramer (2006); modelo das três abordagens chave de Windsor (2006); modelo de VBA de Schwartz e Carroll (2008) e o modelo dos compromissos sociais de Almeida (2010). Em resultado, destaca-se a importância e a forte integração dos stakeholders na RSO, sendo um conceito transversal às diversas teorias revisadas.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2021-05-18T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033Gestão e Desenvolvimento; No 29 (2021); 261-290Gestão e Desenvolvimento; n. 29 (2021); 261-2902184-56380872-556X10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.n29reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033/9745Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Sandrina Sobral, Clotilde Passos, Célia Ribeirohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobral, SandrinaPassos, ClotildeRibeiro, Célia2022-09-23T15:47:22Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:04:41.693417Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
Responsabilidade social das organizações: uma revisão aos principais modelos
title Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
spellingShingle Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
Sobral, Sandrina
title_short Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
title_full Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
title_fullStr Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
title_full_unstemmed Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
title_sort Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
author Sobral, Sandrina
author_facet Sobral, Sandrina
Passos, Clotilde
Ribeiro, Célia
author_role author
author2 Passos, Clotilde
Ribeiro, Célia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sobral, Sandrina
Passos, Clotilde
Ribeiro, Célia
description Organizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-18T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033
url https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033
https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033/9745
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Sandrina Sobral, Clotilde Passos, Célia Ribeiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Sandrina Sobral, Clotilde Passos, Célia Ribeiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gestão e Desenvolvimento; No 29 (2021); 261-290
Gestão e Desenvolvimento; n. 29 (2021); 261-290
2184-5638
0872-556X
10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.n29
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130509637320704