Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033 |
Resumo: | Organizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed. |
id |
RCAP_07e6a960446758bd29e2e1dff06285b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main modelsResponsabilidade social das organizações: uma revisão aos principais modelosOrganizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed.A Responsabilidade Social das Organizações (RSO) é encarada como um dos temas de investigação do século vigente, apresentando-se com uma extensa e diversa evolução concetual, ao incluir novos constructos e dimensões, explicada pela crescente valorização e interesse da sociedade pela temática. Começou a ser estudada desde a segunda metade do século XX e o seu desenvolvimento gerou várias modelos e teorias. Nesse sentido, objetivou-se analisar os modelos de RSO, evidenciando a sua influência nas diferentes fases do conceito, recorrendo a uma metodologia qualitativa. Foram apresentados e analisados criticamente dez modelos, particularmente: teoria e modelo dos stakeholders; modelo piramidal de Carroll (1979); modelo bidimensional de Quazi e O’Brien (2000); modelo dos três domínios de Schwartz e Carroll (2003); modelo de mapeamento do território de Garriga e Melé (2004); modelo de 3C-SR de Meehan, Meehan e Richards (2006); modelo integrativo de Porter e Cramer (2006); modelo das três abordagens chave de Windsor (2006); modelo de VBA de Schwartz e Carroll (2008) e o modelo dos compromissos sociais de Almeida (2010). Em resultado, destaca-se a importância e a forte integração dos stakeholders na RSO, sendo um conceito transversal às diversas teorias revisadas.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2021-05-18T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033Gestão e Desenvolvimento; No 29 (2021); 261-290Gestão e Desenvolvimento; n. 29 (2021); 261-2902184-56380872-556X10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.n29reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033/9745Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Sandrina Sobral, Clotilde Passos, Célia Ribeirohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobral, SandrinaPassos, ClotildeRibeiro, Célia2022-09-23T15:47:22Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:04:41.693417Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models Responsabilidade social das organizações: uma revisão aos principais modelos |
title |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models |
spellingShingle |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models Sobral, Sandrina |
title_short |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models |
title_full |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models |
title_fullStr |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models |
title_sort |
Organizational social responsibility: a review of the main models |
author |
Sobral, Sandrina |
author_facet |
Sobral, Sandrina Passos, Clotilde Ribeiro, Célia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Passos, Clotilde Ribeiro, Célia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sobral, Sandrina Passos, Clotilde Ribeiro, Célia |
description |
Organizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-18T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033 oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10033 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033 https://doi.org/10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.10033 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gestaoedesenvolvimento/article/view/10033/9745 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Sandrina Sobral, Clotilde Passos, Célia Ribeiro http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Sandrina Sobral, Clotilde Passos, Célia Ribeiro http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestão e Desenvolvimento; No 29 (2021); 261-290 Gestão e Desenvolvimento; n. 29 (2021); 261-290 2184-5638 0872-556X 10.34632/gestaoedesenvolvimento.2021.n29 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130509637320704 |