Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Patrão, Afonso
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.7559/mclawreview.2019.316
Resumo: One of the main obstacles to the internal market is legal diversity: Member States often adopt different legal standards not only within public and economic law but also with regard to private law. The traditional approach of European Institutions (harmonising legislation among Member States) was soon complemented by the principle of mutual recognition; these two methodologies embodied the European strategy for minimising the problem. However, a third European tool is becoming obvious: to give private parties the ability to choose the applicable law. This new approach enhances regulatory competition among Member States and turns unessential the unification of national rules, which suits best the proportionality principle. Party autonomy as a means for overcoming the difficulties of legal diversity is not only a reality in European statutory law – which already brought the ability for choosing the applicable law to contracts, torts, divorce, inheritance, alimony, matrimonial property – but is also highlighted in ECJ’s case-law, which declared legal diversity is not a barrier to the basic freedoms as long as parties may choose the applicable rules. The article will focus on the grounds and advantages of this method to address the issue of legal diversity, advocating its use in areas where the traditional approach is ineffective or impossible (such as some rights in rem, within the scope of the freedom of movement of capital).
id RCAP_08abb27b4fc57ae5fce56ae8db79b758
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/316
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European MarketOne of the main obstacles to the internal market is legal diversity: Member States often adopt different legal standards not only within public and economic law but also with regard to private law. The traditional approach of European Institutions (harmonising legislation among Member States) was soon complemented by the principle of mutual recognition; these two methodologies embodied the European strategy for minimising the problem. However, a third European tool is becoming obvious: to give private parties the ability to choose the applicable law. This new approach enhances regulatory competition among Member States and turns unessential the unification of national rules, which suits best the proportionality principle. Party autonomy as a means for overcoming the difficulties of legal diversity is not only a reality in European statutory law – which already brought the ability for choosing the applicable law to contracts, torts, divorce, inheritance, alimony, matrimonial property – but is also highlighted in ECJ’s case-law, which declared legal diversity is not a barrier to the basic freedoms as long as parties may choose the applicable rules. The article will focus on the grounds and advantages of this method to address the issue of legal diversity, advocating its use in areas where the traditional approach is ineffective or impossible (such as some rights in rem, within the scope of the freedom of movement of capital).Universidade Católica Editora2019-04-01T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.7559/mclawreview.2019.316oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/316Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 3 No 1 (2019); 91-131Market and Competition Law Review; v. 3 n. 1 (2019); 91-1312184-000810.7559/mclawreview.2019.3.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/316https://doi.org/10.7559/mclawreview.2019.316https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/316/284Copyright (c) 2019 Afonso Patrãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPatrão, Afonso2022-09-23T15:10:24Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/316Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:39.797447Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
title Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
spellingShingle Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
Patrão, Afonso
title_short Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
title_full Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
title_fullStr Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
title_full_unstemmed Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
title_sort Party Autonomy: Removing Obstacles to Legal Diversity in the European Market
author Patrão, Afonso
author_facet Patrão, Afonso
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Patrão, Afonso
description One of the main obstacles to the internal market is legal diversity: Member States often adopt different legal standards not only within public and economic law but also with regard to private law. The traditional approach of European Institutions (harmonising legislation among Member States) was soon complemented by the principle of mutual recognition; these two methodologies embodied the European strategy for minimising the problem. However, a third European tool is becoming obvious: to give private parties the ability to choose the applicable law. This new approach enhances regulatory competition among Member States and turns unessential the unification of national rules, which suits best the proportionality principle. Party autonomy as a means for overcoming the difficulties of legal diversity is not only a reality in European statutory law – which already brought the ability for choosing the applicable law to contracts, torts, divorce, inheritance, alimony, matrimonial property – but is also highlighted in ECJ’s case-law, which declared legal diversity is not a barrier to the basic freedoms as long as parties may choose the applicable rules. The article will focus on the grounds and advantages of this method to address the issue of legal diversity, advocating its use in areas where the traditional approach is ineffective or impossible (such as some rights in rem, within the scope of the freedom of movement of capital).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.7559/mclawreview.2019.316
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/316
url https://doi.org/10.7559/mclawreview.2019.316
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/316
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/316
https://doi.org/10.7559/mclawreview.2019.316
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/316/284
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Afonso Patrão
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Afonso Patrão
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 3 No 1 (2019); 91-131
Market and Competition Law Review; v. 3 n. 1 (2019); 91-131
2184-0008
10.7559/mclawreview.2019.3.1
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130500009295872