Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mauk, Marlene
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2896
Resumo: What effect does the recent rise of populist parties harnessing an anti-system rhetoric have on political trust? Will citizens become disenchanted with and lose trust in the political system, or could populist party success even stimulate a growth of political trust? Arguing that populist parties may well be conceived as a corrective force giving voice to and addressing citizen concerns about the established political system, this contribution hypothesizes that populist party success will increase political trust among the general public, especially in countries lacking democratic quality, with weak corruption control, and meagre government performance. Empirically, it combines ParlGov data with survey data from the European Social Survey (2002–2016) as well as aggregate data from the Varieties-of-Democracy project and the World Development Indicators to investigate how political trust has changed in relation to the growing success of populist parties and how democratic quality, corruption control, and government performance have moderated this relationship in 23 European democracies. Its main findings indicate that, at least in the short run, political trust increases rather than decreases following populist party success and that this increase in trust is most pronounced in political systems that lack democratic quality, struggle with corruption, and deliver only meager government performance.
id RCAP_0c1768246eb626f9957451d2b37daa27
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2896
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutionscorruption control; democratic quality; economic performance; government performance; political trust; populismWhat effect does the recent rise of populist parties harnessing an anti-system rhetoric have on political trust? Will citizens become disenchanted with and lose trust in the political system, or could populist party success even stimulate a growth of political trust? Arguing that populist parties may well be conceived as a corrective force giving voice to and addressing citizen concerns about the established political system, this contribution hypothesizes that populist party success will increase political trust among the general public, especially in countries lacking democratic quality, with weak corruption control, and meagre government performance. Empirically, it combines ParlGov data with survey data from the European Social Survey (2002–2016) as well as aggregate data from the Varieties-of-Democracy project and the World Development Indicators to investigate how political trust has changed in relation to the growing success of populist parties and how democratic quality, corruption control, and government performance have moderated this relationship in 23 European democracies. Its main findings indicate that, at least in the short run, political trust increases rather than decreases following populist party success and that this increase in trust is most pronounced in political systems that lack democratic quality, struggle with corruption, and deliver only meager government performance.Cogitatio2020-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2896oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2896Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): Populism and Polarization: A Dual Threat to Europe’s Liberal Democracies?; 45-582183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2896https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2896https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2896/2896https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/2896/988Copyright (c) 2020 Marlene Maukhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMauk, Marlene2022-12-22T15:16:26Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2896Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:23.265890Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
title Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
spellingShingle Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
Mauk, Marlene
corruption control; democratic quality; economic performance; government performance; political trust; populism
title_short Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
title_full Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
title_fullStr Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
title_full_unstemmed Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
title_sort Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions
author Mauk, Marlene
author_facet Mauk, Marlene
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mauk, Marlene
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv corruption control; democratic quality; economic performance; government performance; political trust; populism
topic corruption control; democratic quality; economic performance; government performance; political trust; populism
description What effect does the recent rise of populist parties harnessing an anti-system rhetoric have on political trust? Will citizens become disenchanted with and lose trust in the political system, or could populist party success even stimulate a growth of political trust? Arguing that populist parties may well be conceived as a corrective force giving voice to and addressing citizen concerns about the established political system, this contribution hypothesizes that populist party success will increase political trust among the general public, especially in countries lacking democratic quality, with weak corruption control, and meagre government performance. Empirically, it combines ParlGov data with survey data from the European Social Survey (2002–2016) as well as aggregate data from the Varieties-of-Democracy project and the World Development Indicators to investigate how political trust has changed in relation to the growing success of populist parties and how democratic quality, corruption control, and government performance have moderated this relationship in 23 European democracies. Its main findings indicate that, at least in the short run, political trust increases rather than decreases following populist party success and that this increase in trust is most pronounced in political systems that lack democratic quality, struggle with corruption, and deliver only meager government performance.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-17
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2896
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2896
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2896
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2896
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2896
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2896
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2896/2896
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/2896/988
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Marlene Mauk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Marlene Mauk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): Populism and Polarization: A Dual Threat to Europe’s Liberal Democracies?; 45-58
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130669572423680