Cumplicidade
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/46499 |
Resumo: | The present work intends to analyze the figure of complicity provided for in article 27 of the Portuguese Penal Code to discuss aspects shed on complicity material and moral (which is the subject of study); analyze their limits in relation to figures of co-authorship and inciting (the specific objective or problem). This study finds your justification in the fact that in specific cases, perhaps by mistake and given your proximity, the conduct of complicity be attributed to co-authorship, the reverse occurs, and also the instigation (before people contest) by the courts. Research methodology: This study will be made on the basis of three concrete cases decided through two judgments of the SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, delivered in case no. 03P3364, on 04.03.2004, Rapporteur: Rodrigues da Costa; in the process paragraph 17/09. OTELSB. L1. S1, 15.12.2011, Rapporteur: Raúl Borges; This contradicted by João Manuel Bellino Athayde Varela, on your doctoral thesis with the title: "the limits of Criminality in the Authorship" (p. 25-29); and a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Port, proc. no. 0412956, 08.02.2006, Rapporteur: Élia São Pedro. Shall be also a conceptual content approach, both of complicity, of co-authorship and instigation, from the concept of "central" by, so as to be able to carry out a critical analysis of Symmetries and/or existing asymmetries between the three figures. Will still be examined issues that have to do with the subjective aspect of complicity (deceit), abetting negligent on the facts, tempted and attempted complicity. Finally, we intend to add suggestions that can help the future task of the ordinary legislator, in criminal matters, with regard to the delimitation of the complicity and the reformulation of your concept. |
id |
RCAP_0c8992609542b9628a26f7d76605a73c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/46499 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cumplicidadeos seus limites face a figuras próximasCumplicidadeComparticipação criminosaAusência do domínio do factoLimitesComplicityCriminal participationThe absence of that domain of the factLimitsDireitoThe present work intends to analyze the figure of complicity provided for in article 27 of the Portuguese Penal Code to discuss aspects shed on complicity material and moral (which is the subject of study); analyze their limits in relation to figures of co-authorship and inciting (the specific objective or problem). This study finds your justification in the fact that in specific cases, perhaps by mistake and given your proximity, the conduct of complicity be attributed to co-authorship, the reverse occurs, and also the instigation (before people contest) by the courts. Research methodology: This study will be made on the basis of three concrete cases decided through two judgments of the SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, delivered in case no. 03P3364, on 04.03.2004, Rapporteur: Rodrigues da Costa; in the process paragraph 17/09. OTELSB. L1. S1, 15.12.2011, Rapporteur: Raúl Borges; This contradicted by João Manuel Bellino Athayde Varela, on your doctoral thesis with the title: "the limits of Criminality in the Authorship" (p. 25-29); and a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Port, proc. no. 0412956, 08.02.2006, Rapporteur: Élia São Pedro. Shall be also a conceptual content approach, both of complicity, of co-authorship and instigation, from the concept of "central" by, so as to be able to carry out a critical analysis of Symmetries and/or existing asymmetries between the three figures. Will still be examined issues that have to do with the subjective aspect of complicity (deceit), abetting negligent on the facts, tempted and attempted complicity. Finally, we intend to add suggestions that can help the future task of the ordinary legislator, in criminal matters, with regard to the delimitation of the complicity and the reformulation of your concept.O presente trabalho propõe-se a analisar a figura da cumplicidade prevista no artigo 27.º do Código Penal português, para debater os aspectos vertidos na cumplicidade material e moral (sendo este o objecto de estudo); analisar os seus limites em relação às figuras de co-autoria e da instigação (o objectivo específico ou problemática). Este estudo encontra a sua justificação no facto de em casos concretos, talvez por equívoco e dada a sua proximidade, a conduta de cumplicidade ser atribuída à co-autoria, o inverso também ocorre, e também à instigação (perante concurso de pessoas), por parte dos tribunais. Metodologia de pesquisa: Este estudo será feito na base de três casos concretos decididos através de dois Acórdãos do STJ, proferidos no processo nº 03P3364, em 04.03.2004, Relator: Rodrigues da Costa; no processo nº 17/09.OTELSB.L1.S1, em 15.12.2011, Relator: Raúl Borges; - este contrariado por João Manuel Bellino Athayde Varela, na sua tese de doutoramento com título: “Os Limites da Punibilidade em sede de Autoria” (p. 25-29); - e um Acórdão do TRP, processo nº 0412956 de 08.02.2006, Relatora: Élia São Pedro. Far-se-á, também, uma abordagem de teor conceitual, tanto da cumplicidade, da coautoria e da instigação, a partir do conceito “central” da autoria, para assim se poder efectuar uma análise crítica das simetrias ou assimetrias existentes entre as três figuras. Serão ainda analisadas questões que têm a ver com o aspecto subjectivo da cumplicidade (o dolo), a cumplicidade nos factos negligentes, tentados e a tentativa de cumplicidade. Por fim, pretende-se aditar sugestões que possam auxiliar a futura tarefa do legislador ordinário, em sede penal, quanto à delimitação da conduta afecta à cumplicidade e à reformulação do seu conceito.Silva, Germano Marques daRUNRaimundo, João2021-07-01T00:30:24Z2018-07-192018-022018-07-19T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/46499TID:201970058porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-10T15:45:47ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cumplicidade os seus limites face a figuras próximas |
title |
Cumplicidade |
spellingShingle |
Cumplicidade Raimundo, João Cumplicidade Comparticipação criminosa Ausência do domínio do facto Limites Complicity Criminal participation The absence of that domain of the fact Limits Direito |
title_short |
Cumplicidade |
title_full |
Cumplicidade |
title_fullStr |
Cumplicidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cumplicidade |
title_sort |
Cumplicidade |
author |
Raimundo, João |
author_facet |
Raimundo, João |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Germano Marques da RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Raimundo, João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cumplicidade Comparticipação criminosa Ausência do domínio do facto Limites Complicity Criminal participation The absence of that domain of the fact Limits Direito |
topic |
Cumplicidade Comparticipação criminosa Ausência do domínio do facto Limites Complicity Criminal participation The absence of that domain of the fact Limits Direito |
description |
The present work intends to analyze the figure of complicity provided for in article 27 of the Portuguese Penal Code to discuss aspects shed on complicity material and moral (which is the subject of study); analyze their limits in relation to figures of co-authorship and inciting (the specific objective or problem). This study finds your justification in the fact that in specific cases, perhaps by mistake and given your proximity, the conduct of complicity be attributed to co-authorship, the reverse occurs, and also the instigation (before people contest) by the courts. Research methodology: This study will be made on the basis of three concrete cases decided through two judgments of the SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, delivered in case no. 03P3364, on 04.03.2004, Rapporteur: Rodrigues da Costa; in the process paragraph 17/09. OTELSB. L1. S1, 15.12.2011, Rapporteur: Raúl Borges; This contradicted by João Manuel Bellino Athayde Varela, on your doctoral thesis with the title: "the limits of Criminality in the Authorship" (p. 25-29); and a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Port, proc. no. 0412956, 08.02.2006, Rapporteur: Élia São Pedro. Shall be also a conceptual content approach, both of complicity, of co-authorship and instigation, from the concept of "central" by, so as to be able to carry out a critical analysis of Symmetries and/or existing asymmetries between the three figures. Will still be examined issues that have to do with the subjective aspect of complicity (deceit), abetting negligent on the facts, tempted and attempted complicity. Finally, we intend to add suggestions that can help the future task of the ordinary legislator, in criminal matters, with regard to the delimitation of the complicity and the reformulation of your concept. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-19 2018-02 2018-07-19T00:00:00Z 2021-07-01T00:30:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/46499 TID:201970058 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/46499 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:201970058 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777302971512520704 |