From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7305 |
Resumo: | Recycling of electric and electronic waste products (e-waste) which amounted to more than 50 million metric tonnes per year worldwide is a massive and global operation. Unfortunately, an estimated 70-80% of this waste has not been properly managed because the waste went from developed to low-income countries to be dumped into landfills or informally recycled. Such recycling has been carried out either directly on landfill sites or in small, often family-run recycling shops without much regulations or oversights. The process traditionally involved manual dismantling, cleaning with hazardous solvents, burning and melting on open fires, etc., which would generate a variety of toxic substances and exposure/hazards to applicators, family members, proximate residents and the environment. The situation clearly calls for global responsibility to reduce the impact on human health and the environment, especially in developing countries where poor residents have been shouldering the hazardous burden. On the other hand, formal e-waste recycling has been mainly conducted in small scales in industrialised countries. Whether the latter process would impose less risk to populations and environment has not been determined yet. Therefore, the main objectives of this review are: 1. to address current trends and emerging threats of not only informal but also formal e-waste management practices, and 2. to propose adequate measures and interventions. A major recommendation is to conduct independent surveillance of compliance with e-waste trading and processing according to the Basel Ban Amendment. The recycling industry needs to be carefully evaluated by joint effort from international agencies, producing industries and other stakeholders to develop better processes. Subsequent transition to more sustainable and equitable e-waste management solutions should result in more effective use of natural resources, and in prevention of adverse effects on health and the environment. |
id |
RCAP_0ca98d1b50b7e88524a001478da4d276 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/7305 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environmentBasel Ban AmendmentElectronic Waste RecyclingEnvironmental PollutionHealth HazardsE-WasteGenotoxicidade AmbientalRecycling of electric and electronic waste products (e-waste) which amounted to more than 50 million metric tonnes per year worldwide is a massive and global operation. Unfortunately, an estimated 70-80% of this waste has not been properly managed because the waste went from developed to low-income countries to be dumped into landfills or informally recycled. Such recycling has been carried out either directly on landfill sites or in small, often family-run recycling shops without much regulations or oversights. The process traditionally involved manual dismantling, cleaning with hazardous solvents, burning and melting on open fires, etc., which would generate a variety of toxic substances and exposure/hazards to applicators, family members, proximate residents and the environment. The situation clearly calls for global responsibility to reduce the impact on human health and the environment, especially in developing countries where poor residents have been shouldering the hazardous burden. On the other hand, formal e-waste recycling has been mainly conducted in small scales in industrialised countries. Whether the latter process would impose less risk to populations and environment has not been determined yet. Therefore, the main objectives of this review are: 1. to address current trends and emerging threats of not only informal but also formal e-waste management practices, and 2. to propose adequate measures and interventions. A major recommendation is to conduct independent surveillance of compliance with e-waste trading and processing according to the Basel Ban Amendment. The recycling industry needs to be carefully evaluated by joint effort from international agencies, producing industries and other stakeholders to develop better processes. Subsequent transition to more sustainable and equitable e-waste management solutions should result in more effective use of natural resources, and in prevention of adverse effects on health and the environment.Highlights: Most e-waste is informally and inequitably recycled in developing countries; Informal recycling is reported to damage human health and the environment; The currently practised e-waste management system is inequitable and unsustainable; Developing formal and safe e-waste management should be a global priority.This work was supported by the Diagnosis, Monitoring and Prevention of Exposure-Related Noncommunicable Diseases (DiMoPEx) COST Action project (CA15129) and its Final Action Dissemination Grant from the European UnionElsevier/ Academic PressRepositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de SaúdeÁdám, BalázsGöen, ThomasScheepers, Paul T.J.Adliene, DianaBatinic, BojanBudnik, Lygia T.Duca, Radu-CorneliuGhosh, ManosijGiurgiu, Doina I.Godderis, LodeGoksel, OzlemHansen, Karoline K.Kassomenos, PavlosMilic, NatasaOrru, HansPaschalidou, AnastasiaPetrovic, MajaPuiso, JuditaRadonic, JelenaSekulic, Maja T.Teixeira, Joao PauloZaid, HilalAu, William W.2022-01-11T01:30:11Z2021-01-112021-01-11T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7305engEnviron Res. 2021 Jan 11;110728. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110728. Online ahead of print.0013-935110.1016/j.envres.2021.110728info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-20T15:42:01Zoai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/7305Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:42:05.344845Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
title |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
spellingShingle |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment Ádám, Balázs Basel Ban Amendment Electronic Waste Recycling Environmental Pollution Health Hazards E-Waste Genotoxicidade Ambiental |
title_short |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
title_full |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
title_fullStr |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
title_sort |
From inequitable to sustainable e-waste processing for reduction of impact on human health and the environment |
author |
Ádám, Balázs |
author_facet |
Ádám, Balázs Göen, Thomas Scheepers, Paul T.J. Adliene, Diana Batinic, Bojan Budnik, Lygia T. Duca, Radu-Corneliu Ghosh, Manosij Giurgiu, Doina I. Godderis, Lode Goksel, Ozlem Hansen, Karoline K. Kassomenos, Pavlos Milic, Natasa Orru, Hans Paschalidou, Anastasia Petrovic, Maja Puiso, Judita Radonic, Jelena Sekulic, Maja T. Teixeira, Joao Paulo Zaid, Hilal Au, William W. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Göen, Thomas Scheepers, Paul T.J. Adliene, Diana Batinic, Bojan Budnik, Lygia T. Duca, Radu-Corneliu Ghosh, Manosij Giurgiu, Doina I. Godderis, Lode Goksel, Ozlem Hansen, Karoline K. Kassomenos, Pavlos Milic, Natasa Orru, Hans Paschalidou, Anastasia Petrovic, Maja Puiso, Judita Radonic, Jelena Sekulic, Maja T. Teixeira, Joao Paulo Zaid, Hilal Au, William W. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de Saúde |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ádám, Balázs Göen, Thomas Scheepers, Paul T.J. Adliene, Diana Batinic, Bojan Budnik, Lygia T. Duca, Radu-Corneliu Ghosh, Manosij Giurgiu, Doina I. Godderis, Lode Goksel, Ozlem Hansen, Karoline K. Kassomenos, Pavlos Milic, Natasa Orru, Hans Paschalidou, Anastasia Petrovic, Maja Puiso, Judita Radonic, Jelena Sekulic, Maja T. Teixeira, Joao Paulo Zaid, Hilal Au, William W. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Basel Ban Amendment Electronic Waste Recycling Environmental Pollution Health Hazards E-Waste Genotoxicidade Ambiental |
topic |
Basel Ban Amendment Electronic Waste Recycling Environmental Pollution Health Hazards E-Waste Genotoxicidade Ambiental |
description |
Recycling of electric and electronic waste products (e-waste) which amounted to more than 50 million metric tonnes per year worldwide is a massive and global operation. Unfortunately, an estimated 70-80% of this waste has not been properly managed because the waste went from developed to low-income countries to be dumped into landfills or informally recycled. Such recycling has been carried out either directly on landfill sites or in small, often family-run recycling shops without much regulations or oversights. The process traditionally involved manual dismantling, cleaning with hazardous solvents, burning and melting on open fires, etc., which would generate a variety of toxic substances and exposure/hazards to applicators, family members, proximate residents and the environment. The situation clearly calls for global responsibility to reduce the impact on human health and the environment, especially in developing countries where poor residents have been shouldering the hazardous burden. On the other hand, formal e-waste recycling has been mainly conducted in small scales in industrialised countries. Whether the latter process would impose less risk to populations and environment has not been determined yet. Therefore, the main objectives of this review are: 1. to address current trends and emerging threats of not only informal but also formal e-waste management practices, and 2. to propose adequate measures and interventions. A major recommendation is to conduct independent surveillance of compliance with e-waste trading and processing according to the Basel Ban Amendment. The recycling industry needs to be carefully evaluated by joint effort from international agencies, producing industries and other stakeholders to develop better processes. Subsequent transition to more sustainable and equitable e-waste management solutions should result in more effective use of natural resources, and in prevention of adverse effects on health and the environment. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-11 2021-01-11T00:00:00Z 2022-01-11T01:30:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7305 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7305 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Environ Res. 2021 Jan 11;110728. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110728. Online ahead of print. 0013-9351 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110728 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier/ Academic Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier/ Academic Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817550245602525184 |