Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7224 |
Resumo: | Since the 2010s the EU has expanded its preferential trade agreements, responding to challenges at the World Trade Organization and preferential trade agreements of key geoeconomic competitors. However, preferential trade agreements are only as good as their implementation. The EU 2021 Trade Policy Review for a more assertive trade policy includes a greater focus on preferential trade agreement implementation. An analysis of preferential trade agreement implementation reports identifies challenges in operationalising these. It shows that since 2019 there has been an increase in EU recourse to formal dispute settlement mechanisms under preferential trade agreements demonstrating the shift to greater assertiveness. Interestingly, most of the cases are of limited economic significance to the EU but serve to reinforce the message of enforcement of trade rules. |
id |
RCAP_0d5e5c1c58705c104948780fc3e34ad8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7224 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policyagreement enforcement; dispute; European Union; free trade agreements; preferential trade agreements; trade and sustainable developmentSince the 2010s the EU has expanded its preferential trade agreements, responding to challenges at the World Trade Organization and preferential trade agreements of key geoeconomic competitors. However, preferential trade agreements are only as good as their implementation. The EU 2021 Trade Policy Review for a more assertive trade policy includes a greater focus on preferential trade agreement implementation. An analysis of preferential trade agreement implementation reports identifies challenges in operationalising these. It shows that since 2019 there has been an increase in EU recourse to formal dispute settlement mechanisms under preferential trade agreements demonstrating the shift to greater assertiveness. Interestingly, most of the cases are of limited economic significance to the EU but serve to reinforce the message of enforcement of trade rules.Cogitatio Press2023-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7224https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7224Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Economic Security and the Politics of Trade and Investment Policy in Europe; 212-2222183-246310.17645/pag.i372reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7224https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7224/3546https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/7224/3330Copyright (c) 2023 María J. Garcíainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcía, María J.2023-12-21T16:10:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7224Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:40:21.845818Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
title |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
spellingShingle |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy García, María J. agreement enforcement; dispute; European Union; free trade agreements; preferential trade agreements; trade and sustainable development |
title_short |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
title_full |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
title_fullStr |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
title_sort |
Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy |
author |
García, María J. |
author_facet |
García, María J. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
García, María J. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
agreement enforcement; dispute; European Union; free trade agreements; preferential trade agreements; trade and sustainable development |
topic |
agreement enforcement; dispute; European Union; free trade agreements; preferential trade agreements; trade and sustainable development |
description |
Since the 2010s the EU has expanded its preferential trade agreements, responding to challenges at the World Trade Organization and preferential trade agreements of key geoeconomic competitors. However, preferential trade agreements are only as good as their implementation. The EU 2021 Trade Policy Review for a more assertive trade policy includes a greater focus on preferential trade agreement implementation. An analysis of preferential trade agreement implementation reports identifies challenges in operationalising these. It shows that since 2019 there has been an increase in EU recourse to formal dispute settlement mechanisms under preferential trade agreements demonstrating the shift to greater assertiveness. Interestingly, most of the cases are of limited economic significance to the EU but serve to reinforce the message of enforcement of trade rules. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7224 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7224 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7224 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7224 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7224/3546 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/7224/3330 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 María J. García info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 María J. García |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Economic Security and the Politics of Trade and Investment Policy in Europe; 212-222 2183-2463 10.17645/pag.i372 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136309112995840 |