Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marx, Axel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Van der Loo, Guillaume
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3771
Resumo: The EU trade policy is increasingly confronted with demands for more transparency. This article aims to investigate how transparency takes shape in EU trade policy. First, we operationalize the concept of transparency along two dimensions: a process dimension and an actor dimension. We then apply this framework to analysis of EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). After analyzing transparency in relation to FTAs from the perspective of the institutional actors (Commission, Council and Parliament), the different instruments and policies that grant the public actors (civil society and citizens) access to information and documents about EU FTAs are explored by discussing Regulation 1049/2001, which provides for public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, and the role of the European Ombudsman. The article is based on an analysis of official documents, assessments in the academic literature and case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The ultimate aim is to assess current initiatives and identify relevant gaps in the EU’s transparency policies. This article argues that the EU has made significant progress in fostering transparency in the negotiation phase of FTAs, but less in the implementation phase.
id RCAP_d3226783a9ace97ca3a7c2eaa949d00d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3771
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current AchievementsEuropean Commission; European Council; European Parliament; Free Trade Agreements; Ombudsman; regulation; trade policy; transparencyThe EU trade policy is increasingly confronted with demands for more transparency. This article aims to investigate how transparency takes shape in EU trade policy. First, we operationalize the concept of transparency along two dimensions: a process dimension and an actor dimension. We then apply this framework to analysis of EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). After analyzing transparency in relation to FTAs from the perspective of the institutional actors (Commission, Council and Parliament), the different instruments and policies that grant the public actors (civil society and citizens) access to information and documents about EU FTAs are explored by discussing Regulation 1049/2001, which provides for public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, and the role of the European Ombudsman. The article is based on an analysis of official documents, assessments in the academic literature and case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The ultimate aim is to assess current initiatives and identify relevant gaps in the EU’s transparency policies. This article argues that the EU has made significant progress in fostering transparency in the negotiation phase of FTAs, but less in the implementation phase.Cogitatio2021-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3771oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3771Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Access or Excess? Redefining the Boundaries of Transparency in the EU’s Decision-Making; 261-2712183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3771https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3771https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3771/3771Copyright (c) 2021 Axel Marxhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarx, AxelVan der Loo, Guillaume2022-12-22T15:15:31Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3771Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:09.365845Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
title Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
spellingShingle Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
Marx, Axel
European Commission; European Council; European Parliament; Free Trade Agreements; Ombudsman; regulation; trade policy; transparency
title_short Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
title_full Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
title_fullStr Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
title_full_unstemmed Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
title_sort Transparency in EU Trade Policy: A Comprehensive Assessment of Current Achievements
author Marx, Axel
author_facet Marx, Axel
Van der Loo, Guillaume
author_role author
author2 Van der Loo, Guillaume
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marx, Axel
Van der Loo, Guillaume
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv European Commission; European Council; European Parliament; Free Trade Agreements; Ombudsman; regulation; trade policy; transparency
topic European Commission; European Council; European Parliament; Free Trade Agreements; Ombudsman; regulation; trade policy; transparency
description The EU trade policy is increasingly confronted with demands for more transparency. This article aims to investigate how transparency takes shape in EU trade policy. First, we operationalize the concept of transparency along two dimensions: a process dimension and an actor dimension. We then apply this framework to analysis of EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). After analyzing transparency in relation to FTAs from the perspective of the institutional actors (Commission, Council and Parliament), the different instruments and policies that grant the public actors (civil society and citizens) access to information and documents about EU FTAs are explored by discussing Regulation 1049/2001, which provides for public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, and the role of the European Ombudsman. The article is based on an analysis of official documents, assessments in the academic literature and case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The ultimate aim is to assess current initiatives and identify relevant gaps in the EU’s transparency policies. This article argues that the EU has made significant progress in fostering transparency in the negotiation phase of FTAs, but less in the implementation phase.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3771
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3771
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3771
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3771
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3771
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3771
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3771/3771
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Axel Marx
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Axel Marx
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Access or Excess? Redefining the Boundaries of Transparency in the EU’s Decision-Making; 261-271
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130667394531328