Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Shakespeare, Tom
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Cooper, Harriet, Bezmez, Dikmen, Poland, Fiona
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175
Resumo: Rehabilitation is a controversial subject in disability studies, often discussed in terms of oppression, normalisation, and unwanted intrusion. While there may be good reasons for positioning rehabilitation in this way, this has also meant that, as a lived experience, it is under-researched and neglected in disabilities literature, as we show by surveying leading disability studies journals. With some notable exceptions, rehabilitation research has remained the preserve of the rehabilitation sciences, and such studies have rarely included the voices of disabled people themselves, as we also demonstrate by surveying a cross-section of rehabilitation science literature. Next, drawing on new research, we argue for reframing access to rehabilitation as a disability equality issue. Through in-depth discussion of two case studies, we demonstrate that rehabilitation can be a tool for inclusion and for supporting an equal life. Indeed, we contend that rehabilitation merits disability researchers’ sustained engagement, precisely to ensure that a ‘right-based rehabilitation’ policy and practice can be developed, which is not oppressive, but reflects the views and experiences of the disabled people who rehabilitation should serve.
id RCAP_0d913c84662844dd096f8fdc13f0ebd6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rightsRehabilitation is a controversial subject in disability studies, often discussed in terms of oppression, normalisation, and unwanted intrusion. While there may be good reasons for positioning rehabilitation in this way, this has also meant that, as a lived experience, it is under-researched and neglected in disabilities literature, as we show by surveying leading disability studies journals. With some notable exceptions, rehabilitation research has remained the preserve of the rehabilitation sciences, and such studies have rarely included the voices of disabled people themselves, as we also demonstrate by surveying a cross-section of rehabilitation science literature. Next, drawing on new research, we argue for reframing access to rehabilitation as a disability equality issue. Through in-depth discussion of two case studies, we demonstrate that rehabilitation can be a tool for inclusion and for supporting an equal life. Indeed, we contend that rehabilitation merits disability researchers’ sustained engagement, precisely to ensure that a ‘right-based rehabilitation’ policy and practice can be developed, which is not oppressive, but reflects the views and experiences of the disabled people who rehabilitation should serve.Cogitatio2018-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 61-722183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175/1175https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/231https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/291https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/292https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/293Copyright (c) 2018 Tom Shakespeare, Harriet Cooper, Dikmen Bezmez, Fiona Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShakespeare, TomCooper, HarrietBezmez, DikmenPoland, Fiona2022-12-20T10:59:54Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:26.666086Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
title Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
spellingShingle Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
Shakespeare, Tom
concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rights
title_short Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
title_full Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
title_fullStr Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
title_sort Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
author Shakespeare, Tom
author_facet Shakespeare, Tom
Cooper, Harriet
Bezmez, Dikmen
Poland, Fiona
author_role author
author2 Cooper, Harriet
Bezmez, Dikmen
Poland, Fiona
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Shakespeare, Tom
Cooper, Harriet
Bezmez, Dikmen
Poland, Fiona
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rights
topic concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rights
description Rehabilitation is a controversial subject in disability studies, often discussed in terms of oppression, normalisation, and unwanted intrusion. While there may be good reasons for positioning rehabilitation in this way, this has also meant that, as a lived experience, it is under-researched and neglected in disabilities literature, as we show by surveying leading disability studies journals. With some notable exceptions, rehabilitation research has remained the preserve of the rehabilitation sciences, and such studies have rarely included the voices of disabled people themselves, as we also demonstrate by surveying a cross-section of rehabilitation science literature. Next, drawing on new research, we argue for reframing access to rehabilitation as a disability equality issue. Through in-depth discussion of two case studies, we demonstrate that rehabilitation can be a tool for inclusion and for supporting an equal life. Indeed, we contend that rehabilitation merits disability researchers’ sustained engagement, precisely to ensure that a ‘right-based rehabilitation’ policy and practice can be developed, which is not oppressive, but reflects the views and experiences of the disabled people who rehabilitation should serve.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175/1175
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/231
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/291
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/292
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/293
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Tom Shakespeare, Harriet Cooper, Dikmen Bezmez, Fiona Poland
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Tom Shakespeare, Harriet Cooper, Dikmen Bezmez, Fiona Poland
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 61-72
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130661196398592