Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175 |
Resumo: | Rehabilitation is a controversial subject in disability studies, often discussed in terms of oppression, normalisation, and unwanted intrusion. While there may be good reasons for positioning rehabilitation in this way, this has also meant that, as a lived experience, it is under-researched and neglected in disabilities literature, as we show by surveying leading disability studies journals. With some notable exceptions, rehabilitation research has remained the preserve of the rehabilitation sciences, and such studies have rarely included the voices of disabled people themselves, as we also demonstrate by surveying a cross-section of rehabilitation science literature. Next, drawing on new research, we argue for reframing access to rehabilitation as a disability equality issue. Through in-depth discussion of two case studies, we demonstrate that rehabilitation can be a tool for inclusion and for supporting an equal life. Indeed, we contend that rehabilitation merits disability researchers’ sustained engagement, precisely to ensure that a ‘right-based rehabilitation’ policy and practice can be developed, which is not oppressive, but reflects the views and experiences of the disabled people who rehabilitation should serve. |
id |
RCAP_0d913c84662844dd096f8fdc13f0ebd6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies?concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rightsRehabilitation is a controversial subject in disability studies, often discussed in terms of oppression, normalisation, and unwanted intrusion. While there may be good reasons for positioning rehabilitation in this way, this has also meant that, as a lived experience, it is under-researched and neglected in disabilities literature, as we show by surveying leading disability studies journals. With some notable exceptions, rehabilitation research has remained the preserve of the rehabilitation sciences, and such studies have rarely included the voices of disabled people themselves, as we also demonstrate by surveying a cross-section of rehabilitation science literature. Next, drawing on new research, we argue for reframing access to rehabilitation as a disability equality issue. Through in-depth discussion of two case studies, we demonstrate that rehabilitation can be a tool for inclusion and for supporting an equal life. Indeed, we contend that rehabilitation merits disability researchers’ sustained engagement, precisely to ensure that a ‘right-based rehabilitation’ policy and practice can be developed, which is not oppressive, but reflects the views and experiences of the disabled people who rehabilitation should serve.Cogitatio2018-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 61-722183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175/1175https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/231https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/291https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/292https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/293Copyright (c) 2018 Tom Shakespeare, Harriet Cooper, Dikmen Bezmez, Fiona Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShakespeare, TomCooper, HarrietBezmez, DikmenPoland, Fiona2022-12-20T10:59:54Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:26.666086Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
title |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
spellingShingle |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? Shakespeare, Tom concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rights |
title_short |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
title_full |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
title_fullStr |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
title_sort |
Rehabilitation as a Disability Equality Issue: A Conceptual Shift for Disability Studies? |
author |
Shakespeare, Tom |
author_facet |
Shakespeare, Tom Cooper, Harriet Bezmez, Dikmen Poland, Fiona |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cooper, Harriet Bezmez, Dikmen Poland, Fiona |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Shakespeare, Tom Cooper, Harriet Bezmez, Dikmen Poland, Fiona |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rights |
topic |
concept; disability; equality; rehabilitation; rights |
description |
Rehabilitation is a controversial subject in disability studies, often discussed in terms of oppression, normalisation, and unwanted intrusion. While there may be good reasons for positioning rehabilitation in this way, this has also meant that, as a lived experience, it is under-researched and neglected in disabilities literature, as we show by surveying leading disability studies journals. With some notable exceptions, rehabilitation research has remained the preserve of the rehabilitation sciences, and such studies have rarely included the voices of disabled people themselves, as we also demonstrate by surveying a cross-section of rehabilitation science literature. Next, drawing on new research, we argue for reframing access to rehabilitation as a disability equality issue. Through in-depth discussion of two case studies, we demonstrate that rehabilitation can be a tool for inclusion and for supporting an equal life. Indeed, we contend that rehabilitation merits disability researchers’ sustained engagement, precisely to ensure that a ‘right-based rehabilitation’ policy and practice can be developed, which is not oppressive, but reflects the views and experiences of the disabled people who rehabilitation should serve. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1175 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1175 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1175/1175 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/231 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/291 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/292 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/1175/293 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Tom Shakespeare, Harriet Cooper, Dikmen Bezmez, Fiona Poland http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Tom Shakespeare, Harriet Cooper, Dikmen Bezmez, Fiona Poland http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 61-72 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130661196398592 |